The Crocodile in the Russian Language, Consciousness, and Culture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.4.745

Keywords:

Russian lexicology, semantics, psycholinguistics, secondary semantisation, metaphor, Russian culture, crocodile

Abstract

The development of figurative secondary meanings in a word is due to the correlation of denotative and reference components, i. e. sigmatics and semantics. The starting point of the study is the hypothesis that the farther the object is from the everyday life of a society (i. e. the more exotic it is, the less significant in practice, the less common for the native speaker), the weaker, the “emptier” is the denotative part of the name. However, this non-semantics is apparent, because denotative emptiness is immediately compensated by the development of figurative meanings, most of which are connotative. This article examines the Russian word крокодил, meaning an exotic water animal. The author studies the characteristics of this lexeme based on explanatory and frequency dictionaries of the Russian language, associative dictionary, the Russian National Corpus, and several examples from Russian fiction: works of Vl. Solovyov, A. Chekhov, M. Gorky, T. Tolstoy, V. Kantor, etc. For Russian consciousness, the crocodile is a marginal creature, and its name is located on the periphery of the vocabulary. The national corpus of the Russian language contains 500 documents with the word крокодил and a total of 1222 entries. The analysis demonstrates that about two thirds of these documents contain the word крокодил in figurative meanings. This confirms the assumption that the word denoting a thing that does not participate in the daily life of a society has a tendency to secondary semantic content. It is interpreted metaphorically, in accordance with the cognitive and communicative needs of society.

Author Biography

Boris Norman

Dr. Hab. (Philology), Independent Researcher (Minsk, Belarus).

ORCID 0000-0001-8520-5387

boris.norman@gmail.com

References

Bezzubtsev-Kondakov, A. E. (2010). Krokodil v russkoi literature: ot Fedora Dostoevskogo do Eduarda Uspenskogo [The Crocodile in Russian Literature: From Fyodor Dostoevsky to Eduard Uspensky]. In Elektronnyi zhurnal RONO [website]. Iss. 7 (June). URL: https://sites.google.com/a/shko.la/ejrono_1/vypuski-zurnala/vypusk-7-iun-2010/innovacii-poisk-i-issledovania/krokodil-v-russkoj-literature-ot-fedora-dostoevskogo-doeduarda-uspenskogo (accessed: 01.03.2021).

Bogdanov, K. A. (2014). O krokodilakh v Rossii. Ocherki iz istorii zaimstvovanii i ekzotizmov [About Crocodiles in Russia. Essays from the History of Loanwords and Exoticisms]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 348 p.

BTSRYa – Kuznetsov, S. A. (Ed.). (1998). Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka [The Great Dictionary of the Russian Language]. St Petersburg, Norint. 1535 p.

Frumkina, R. M. (1993). Yazykovye geshtal’ty i problema predstavleniya znanii [Language Gestalts and the Problem of Knowledge Representation]. In Sbornik ot nauchni trudove, posveten na sedemdesetgodishninata na profesor Miroslav Yanakiev. Sofia, Izdatelstvo ET Boiko Kacharmazov, pp. 138–150.

Klaus, G. (1972). Die Macht des Wortes. Ein erkenntnistheoretisch-pragmatisches Traktat. 6. Auflage. Berlin, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften. 200 S.

Kuße, H. (2012). Kulturwissenschaftliche Linguistik. Eine Einführung. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht UTB. 319 S.

Kuznetsova, E. V. (1982). Leksikologiya russkogo yazyka [Lexicology of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola. 152 p.

Lyashevskaya, O. N., Sharov, S. A. (2009). Chastotnyi slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (na materiale Natsional’nogo korpusa russkogo yazyka) [Frequency Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language (Based on the Material of the National Corpus of the Russian Language)]. Moscow, Azbukovnik. 1087 p.

Morris, Ch. W. (1983). Osnovaniya teorii znakov [Foundations of the Theory of Signs]. In Stepanov, Yu. S. (Ed.) Semiotika. Moscow, Raduga, pp. 37–89.

NKRYa – Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [ National Corpus of the Russian Language]. URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru (accessed: 10.02.2021).

Norman, B. Yu. (2010). Ot leksicheskogo znacheniya k kontseptu i obratno (slovo chemodan v russkoyazychnom soznanii) [From the Lexical Meaning to the Concept and Back (the Word чемодан in the Russian-Speaking Mind)]. In Problemy russkogo i obshchego yazykoznaniya. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnych trudov. Iss 8. Yelets, Yeletskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, pp. 59–68.

Puzyrev, A. V. (2014). O sistemnom podkhode v lingvistike [On the Systemic Approach in Linguistics]. Moscow, VNIIgeosistem. 520 p.

Schuchardt, H. (1960). Veshchi i slova [Things and Words]. In Zvegintsev, V. A. Istoriya yazykoznaniya XIX i XX vekov v ocherkakh i izvlecheniyakh v 2 ch. Moscow, Uchpedgiz. Part 1, pp. 275–283.

SOTRS – Golev, N. D. (Ed.). (2012). Slovar’ obydennykh tolkovanii russkikh slov. Leksika prirody v 2 t. [Dictionary of Everyday Interpretations of Russian Words. The Vocabulary of Nature. 2 Vols.]. Kemerovo, Kemerovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. Vol. 1. A – M (Abrikos – Muravei). 535 p.

SSRLYa – Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka v 17 t. [Dictionary of Modern Russian Literary Language. 17 Vols.]. (1948–1965). Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.

Sternin, I. A. (2006). Kontsept i znachenie [Concept and Meaning]. In Dotsenko, T. I. et al. (Eds.) …Slovo otzovetsya. Pamyati A. S. Shtern i L. V. Sakharnogo. Perm, Permskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, pp. 132–138.

Suprun, A. E. (1978). Lektsii po yazykovedeniyu [Lectures in Linguistics]. Minsk, Izdatel’stvo Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni V. I. Lenina. 144 p.

Vaňková, I. (1999). Človĕk a jazykový obraz (přirozeného) svĕta. In Slovo a slovesnost. No. 60, pp. 283–292.

Walter, H., Mokienko, V. M. (2007). Bol’shoi slovar’ russkikh prozvishch [The Great Dictionary of Russian Nicknames]. Moscow, OLMA Media group. 704 p.

Published

2022-11-04

How to Cite

Norman, B. (2022). The Crocodile in the Russian Language, Consciousness, and Culture. Quaestio Rossica, 10(4), 1529–1540. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.4.745

Issue

Section

Disputatio