Factory Forecourts: Peculiarities in Construction and Cultural and Historical Semantics during Industrialisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.3.721Keywords:
constructivism, factory square, industrialisation, industrial heritage, industrial archaeology of the USSR between the 1920s and 1940s, urban planning systemAbstract
This article analyses the architectural complexes of industrial forecourts that emerged in the USSR between the late 1920s and early 1940s and their cultural and symbolic role. The author evaluates the phenomenon of the pre-factory entrance area in a global context, showing that the organisation of the contact zone between the factory and the city had been used in the Russian tradition of the eighteenth – early nineteenth centuries and, more recently, in the US and Western Europe in the early twentieth century. The author analyses 45 cases of Soviet urban planning during industrialisation and distinguishes three main types of contact zones, i. e. arterial, junction, and isolated. The rarest variety of the junction type is a welldeveloped factory forecourt, which comprises different facilities of administrative, social, and cultural infrastructure, and, in addition, possesses special symbolic and memorial significance. Only six out of 45 meet this definition, namely, in Makeevka, Saratov, Volgograd, Magnitogorsk, Yekaterinburg, and Novokuznetsk. Considering these cases, the author demonstrates that it was the landscape of these squares that stimulated the formation of cultural mythology, with the emergence of cultural artifacts, like the tank monument in the square of the Volgograd Tractor Plant or A. P. Bannikov’s mausoleum in the square of the Ural Heavy Machine-Building Plant. In four cases (Volgograd, Magnitogorsk, Yekaterinburg, Novokuznetsk), these factory forecourts were turned into places for rallies and meetings and became elements of the visual standard of representation for these locations, and acquired the status of places of historical memory. These townplanning ensembles, which manifest threefold architectural, social, and symbolic uniqueness, ought to be considered extremely valuable, therefore requiring a cautious policy of cultural heritage preservation, which is especially important in the context of partial deindustrialisation of Russian cities.
References
Arkhipova, Yu. V. (2016). Vizual’nye obrazy Urala i ikh rol’ v konstruirovanii brendov [Visual Images of the Urals and Their Role in Constructing Brands]. In Vestnik Gumanitarnogo universiteta. No. 1, pp. 83–92.
Beklenishcheva, M. V. (2021). Sverdlovskaya oblast’ v diplomaticheskoi istorii SSSR: vizity pervykh lits inostrannykh gosudarstv v region (1955–1965) [Sverdlovsk Region in the Diplomatic History of the USSR: Visits of Foreign Leaders to the Region (1955–1965)]. In Historia provinciae – zhurnal regional’noi istorii. Vol. 5. No. 2, pp. 529–570. DOI 10.23859/2587-8344-2021-5-2-6.
Belyaeva, M. A. (2016). Obraz Ekaterinburga: ot istorii k sovremennosti [The Image of Yekaterinburg: From History to Modernity]. In Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostei. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa. No. 1, pp. 119–127.
Blaginykh, E. A., Drozhzhin, R. A. (2018). Mekhanizmy i printsipy renovatsii stagniruyushchikh territorii promyshlennykh predpriyatii [The Mechanisms and Principles of Stagnating Territories Renovation of Industrial Enterprises]. In Gradostroitel’stvo i arkhitektura. No. 4, pp. 61–68. DOI 10.17673/Vestnik.2018.04.11.
Boitler, V. S. (1936). Arkhitekturnaya rekonstruktsiya Stalingradskogo traktornogo zavoda [Architectural Reconstruction of the Stalingrad Tractor Plant]. In Problemy arkhitektury. Moscow, Vsesoyuznaya Akademiya arkhitektury. Vol. 1. Book 2, pp. 137–143.
Bryzgalina, E. (2019). Ostanovivshii vremya [The One Who Stopped Time]. In Magnitogorskii metall. August 15. No. 91 (13596), p. 12.
Buder S. (1967). The Model Town of Pullman: Town Planning and Social Control in the Gilded Age. In Journal of the American Institute of Planners. No. 1, pp. 2–10.
Chemonin, A. (1980). Pervenets pervoi pyatiletki [The First-Born of First Five Year Plan]. In Izvestiya. June 16. No. 140 (10510), p. 2.
Cherednichenko, Zh. M. (2018). Novokuznetsk v 1920–1930-e gody v pamyatnikakh modernizma [Novokuznetsk in the 1920s – 1930s in the Monuments of Modernism]. In Balandinskie chteniya. No. 1, pp. 601–605.
Chernysh, M. A. (2015). Otrazheniya stilya konstruktivizm v istoricheskoi zastroike g. Makeevki (na primere poselka Sovremennaya koloniya) [Constructivist Reflections in Historical Urban Landscape of Makeevka (with Reference to Sovremennaya Koloniya Settlement]. In Aprobatsiya. No. 10 (37), pp. 20–23.
Danilov, V. N. (2013). Oboronno-promyshlennyi kompleks Saratova v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny: problemy formirovaniya i deyatel’nosti [The Defensive and Industrial Complex of Saratov during the Great Patriotic War: Issues of Formation and Activity]. In Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 13. Iss. 2, pp. 102–111.
Desyat’ let goroda uglya i metalla [Ten Years of the City of Coal and Metal]. (1934). Stalinsk, Yubileinaya komissiya. 288 p.
Efremova, E. N. (2015). “Zdes’ budet gorod-sad”: utopicheskii obraz goroda v zavodskoi gazete Uralmasha [“Here will be a garden-city”: Utopian Image of a City in the Uralmash Plant Newspaper]. In Quaestio Rossica. No. 4, pp. 57–82. DOI 10.15826/qr.2015.4.126.
Freidin, I. (1937). Strana Sovetov. Kratkii ekonomiko-geograficheskii ocherk SSSR [The Country of Soviets. An Essay on the Economy and Geography of the USSR]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya. 354 p.
Il’chenko, M. S. (2016). Opyt Uralmasha v arkhitekture sovetskogo avangarda: gradostroitel’nyi eksperiment 1920–1930-kh gg. [Uralmash in the Architecture of Soviet Avant-Garde: An Experiment in City Construction in the 1920s and 1930s]. In Quaestio Rossica. No. 3, pp. 55–71. DOI 10.15826/qr.2016.3.175.
Ilivitskaya, L. G. (2019). Tsentr i periferii goroda: khronotopicheskie konflikty [The Centre and Periphery of a City: Chronotopic Conflicts]. In Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik. No. 2, pp. 153–157. DOI 10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10364.
Lawrence Park Trail. (N. d.). In Let’s Move Outside! Erie County Recreational Passport. URL: http://letsmoveoutside.org/trails.php/Lawrence-Park-Trail/51/2218/655/5017 (accessed: 02.01.2022).
Lotareva, R. M. (1993). Goroda-zavody Rossii. XVIII – pervaya polovina XIX veka [Factory Towns of Russia. 18th – First Half of 19th Centuries]. Yekaterinburg, Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta, Ural’skii arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennyi institut. 216 p.
Melent’ev, A. (1981). Distsiplina truda [Labour Discipline]. In Pravda. Febr. 6. No. 37 (22833), p. 2.
Milton Hershey and the Derry Township Public Schools. (N. d.). In Hershey Community Archives. URL: https://hersheyarchives.org/encyclopedia/milton-hershey-and-the-derrytownship-public-schools/ (accessed: 02.01.2022).
Nesterova, Z. N. (1951). Magnitogorsk [Magnitogorsk]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo literatury po stroitel’stvu i arkhitekture. 64 p.
Nikolaev, I. S. (1935). Ob arkhitekturnom litse sovetskogo zavoda [On the Architectural Face of the Soviet Factory]. In Akademiya arkhitektury. No. 1–2, pp. 85–91.
Piskunova, L. P., Starostova, L. E., Yankov, I. V. (2017). Rekontekstualizatsiya arkhitekturnogo naslediya sovetskogo avangarda: vystavochnyi proekt „Gorodki Sverdlovska: ot arkhitekturnogo proekta k sotsial’nomu opytu” [A Recontextualisation of the Architectural Heritage of Soviet Avant-Garde: Exhibition Project The Towhships of Sverdlovsk: From an Architectural Project towards a Social Experiment]. In Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. No. 2, pp. 85–98. DOI 10.17072/2219-3111-2017-2-85-98.
Politini, S. (2014). Torviscosa, la città della cellulosa in Friuli Venezia Giulia. In Archeologiaindustriale.net [website]. URL: https://archeologiaindustriale.net/2100_torviscosa-la-citta-della-cellulosa-in-friuli-venezia-giulia/ (accessed: 02.01.2022).
Rastorguev, A., Tokmeninova, L., Fol’pert, A. (2011). Nasledie eksperimenta. Iz istorii arkhitekturnogo avangarda na Urale [The Legacy of an Experiment. From the History of Architectural Avant-Garde in the Urals]. In Ural [website]. No. 6. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/ural/2011/6/nasledie-eksperimenta.html (accessed: 07.07.2022).
Savchenko, I. P., Lipyavkin, A. F., Kalinichenko, P. P. (1967). Tsaritsyn – Stalingrad – Volgograd [Tsarytsyn – Stalingrad – Volgograd]. Volgograd, Nizhne-Volzhskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. 191 p.
Sholukh, N. V., Gubanov, A. V. (2012). Ideino-gumanisticheskie i kompozitsionnoplanirovochnye aspekty formirovaniya promyshlennykh poselkov 1920–1930-kh gg. v g. Makeevke [The Humanist and Urbanist Aspects of the Formation of Industrial Settlements in Makeevka between the 1920s and 1930s]. In Visnik Donbas’koi natsional’noi akademii budivnitstva i arkhitekturi. No. 4, pp. 12–21.
Starostenko, Yu. D. (2019). Zlin – ideal’nyi gorod mezhvoennogo cheshskogo modernizma [Zlin, an Ideal City of Interbellum Czech Modernism]. In Voprosy vseobshсhei istorii arkhitektury. No. 1, pp. 261–282. DOI 10.25995/NIITIAG.2019.12.1.013.
Stepanov, A. V., Stepanova, T. M. (2014). Konstruktivizm v strukture arkhitekturno-stilevoi aidentiki Ekaterinburga [Constructivism in the Structure of the Architectural and Stylistic Identity of Yekaterinburg]. In Akademicheskii vestnik UralNIIproekt RASN. No. 2, pp. 15–19.
Tokarev, A. G. (2019). Stalingradskii traktornyi zavod – prostranstvo industrializatsii i konstruktivizma [The Stalingrad Tractor Plant – Space of Industrialisation and Constructivism]. In Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta. No. 1, pp. 85–100. DOI 10.31675/1607-1859-2019-21-1-85-100.
Trubina, E. G. (2013). Primiryayas’ s upadkom: ruiny 2.0 [Accepting the Decline: Ruins 2.0]. In Neprikosnovennyi zapas [website]. No. 3. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2013/3/14t-pr.html (accessed: 07.07.2022).
Van’ke, A., Polukhina, E. (2018). Territorial’naya identichnost’ v industrial’nykh raionakh: kul’turnye praktiki zavodskikh rabochikh i deyatelei sovremennogo iskusstva [Territorial Identities in Industrial Neighborhoods: Cultural Practices of Factory Workers and Contemporary Art Communities]. In Laboratorium. No. 3, pp. 4–34. DOI 10.25285/2078-1938-2018-10-3-4-34.
Yakovlev, V. B. (2006). Razvitie arkhitekturno-planirovochnykh struktur malykh metallurgicheskikh gorodov Urala [The Development of Architectural Planning Structures of Small Metallurgical Towns of the Urals]. Avtoref. dis. … kand. arkhitektury. Yekaterinburg, S. n. 28 p.
Yavkina, Yu. A. (2019). Arkhitekturno-planirovochnoe formirovanie predzavodskoi territorii promyshlennykh predpriyatii g. Novosibirska [The Architectural Formation of Factory Entrance Territory of Industrial Enterprises in Novosibirsk]. In Noema. (Arkhitektura. Urbanistika. Iskusstvo). No. 2, pp. 20–33.
Zhuravkov, Yu. M. (1998). Kak stroilsya Novyi Kuznetsk: Istoriya raionov goroda: arkhitektura i blagoustroistvo [How Novyi Kuznetsk Was Built: The History of the City Districts: Architecture and Urban Improvement]. In Novokuznetsk, 380. Gorod i sud’by. 1618–1998. Novokuznetsk, PrizmaDo, pp. 30–78.
Zhuravleva, N. I., Mel’nikova, S. V. (2017). Ekaterinburg – Sverdlovsk: transformatsiya obraza goroda [Yekaterinburg – Sverdlovsk: The Transformation of the City Image]. In Chelovek v mire kul’tury. Regional’nye kul’turologicheskie issledovaniya. No. 2/3 (21), pp. 66–70.
Zil’bert, A. E. (1936). Planirovka promyshlennoj territorii [Industrial Territory Planning]. In Problemy arkhitektury. Moscow, Vsesoyuznaya Akademiya arkhitektury. Vol. 1. Book 2, pp. 7–38.
