Commission as an Extraordinary Form of Management in the Russian Empire (a Crimean Version)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.3.706Keywords:
Land Commission, Russian Empire, Taurida, Taurida Governorate, CrimeaAbstract
This article considers the history of conflict resolution between different classes of the Taurida population between the late eighteenth and first quarter of the nineteenth centuries. The contentions arose because of land redistribution after the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Empire. Another purpose of this article is to consider the history of the Commission as a specific institution of state power, which was created to solve the most difficult problems of public administration. In this study, the author proposes a new approach to assessing the activities of land commissions that operated in Crimea. The author concludes that there was a unique situation in Taurida, where traditional levers of checks and balances existing in most regions of the Russian Empire did not work. Consequently, the local population classes protected their interests at all costs. It led to the collapse of the regional administrative system. The commissions were engaged in solving this problem in 1802–1810 and 1816–1819. These institutions established a direct dialogue between the centre and the participants of the conflicts, avoiding the bureaucratic system that was quite often a part of the conflict. The success of the commissions directly depended on its personnel. The personal strategies and motivations of the commission members were crucial because their opinion was decisive. The main task of the commissions was to ensure order and mutual understanding between different groups of the population but not to make fair decisions. The Crimean Tatars, nobility, and bureaucracy participated in the conflicts. The centre had to balance between their interests, which influenced the decisions made. Frequently, they tried to freeze conflicts and leave their solution for the future. It often happened when disputes concerned the local bureaucracy and the most prominent representatives of the nobility. The research methods rely on the general historical principles of academic objectivity and consistency. The article refers to archival materials from the collections of the Russian State Historical Archive and the State Archive of the Republic of Crimea.
References
Berendts, E. N. (2002). O proshlom i nastoyashchem russkoi administratsii: zapiska, sostavlennaya v dekabre 1903 goda [About the Past and Present of the Russian Administration: A Note Written in December 1903] Moscow, Gosudarstvennaya publichnaya istoricheskaya biblioteka. 286 p.
Biktasheva, A. N. (2014). Kazanskoe gubernatorstvo pervoi poloviny XIX v.: bremya vlasti [Kazan Province in the First Half of the 19th Century: The Burden of Power]. 2nd Ed., add. Moscow, Rukopisnye pamyatniki Drevnei Rusi. 320 p.
Bogdanovich, M. I. (1869). Istoriya tsarstvovaniya imperatora Aleksandra I i Rossii v ego vremya v 6 t. [History of Emperor Alexander I’s Reign and Russia in His Time. 6 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Tipograiya F. Sushchinskogo. Vol. 1. 539 p.
GARK [State Archive of the Republic of Crimea]. Stock 23. List 1. Dos. 9; Stock 24. List 1. Dos. 466; Stock 799. List 1. Dos. 6.
Herzen, A. I. (1947). Byloe i dumy [My Past and Thoughts]. Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury. 888 p.
Istoriya Pravitel’stvuyushchego senata za dvesti let. 1711–1911 gg. v 5 t. [History of the Governing Senate for Two Hundred Years. 5 Vols.]. (1911). St Petersburg, Senatskaya tipografiya. Vol. 3. 740 p. Vol. 4. 564 p.
Kappeler, A. (2000). Rossiya – mnogonatsional’naya imperiya: nekotorye razmyshleniya vosem’ let spustya posle publikatsii knigi [Russia, a Multi-Ethnic Empire: Some Reflections Eight Years after the Book Was Published]. In Ab Imperio. No. 1, pp. 343–358.
Konkin, D. V. (2008). Vakufnoe zemlevladenie v kontekste deyatel’nosti pervykh zemleustroitel’nykh komissii v Krymu (1796–1810 gg.) [Waqf Landownership in the Context of the Activities of First Land Surveying Commissions in Crimea (1796–1810)]. In Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii. Vol. 14, pp. 491–512.
Konkin, D. V. (2016). Zemel’nye konflikty v Krymu (konets XVIII – nachalo XIX vv.): “mneniya” i proekty [Land Conflicts in Crimea (Late 18th – Early 19th Centuries): “Opinions” and Projects]. In Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii. Vol. 21, pp. 375–390.
Kravchuk, A. S. (2013). K biografii tavricheskogo grazhdanskogo gubernatora A. M. Borozdina [Taurida Governor A. M. Borozdin]. In Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional’nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriya: Istoricheskie nauki. Vol. 26 (65). No. 2, pp. 45–66.
Kravchuk, A. S. (2019). Dela i dni: tavricheskie gubernatory, 1802–1854 gody [Activities and Days of Taurida Governors. 1802–1854]. Simferopol, Biznes-Inform. 244 p.
Lashkov, F. F. (1895). Istoricheskii ocherk krymskotatarskogo zemlevladeniya: prodolzhenie [A Historical Overview of Crimean Tatar Land Ownership: Continued]. In Izvestiya Tavricheskoi uchenoi arkhivnoi komissii. No. 23, pp. 71–117.
Lashkov, F. F. (1896a). Istoricheskii ocherk krymskotatarskogo zemlevladeniya: prodolzhenie [A Historical Overview of Crimean Tatar Land Ownership: Continued]. In Izvestiya Tavricheskoi uchenoi arkhivnoi komissii. No. 24, pp. 35–71.
Lashkov, F. F. (1896b). Istoricheskii ocherk krymskotatarskogo zemlevladeniya: okonchanie [A Historical Overview of Crimean Tatar Land Ownership: Final Part]. In Izvestiya Tavricheskoi uchenoi arkhivnoi komissii. No. 25, pp. 29–88.
Lashkov, F. F. (1897). Sbornik dokumentov po istorii krymskotatarskogo zemlevladeniya: okonchanie [A Collection of Documents on the History of Crimean Tatar Land Ownership: Final Part]. In Izvestiya Tavricheskoi uchenoi arkhivnoi komissii. No. 26, pp. 89–154.
Lokhvitskii, A. V. (1864). Guberniya, ee zemskie i pravitel’stvennye uchrezhdeniya [The Province, Its Zemstvo and Government Offices]. 2nd Ed., with ed. St Petersburg, Tipografiya Ivana Bochkareva. Part. 1. 228 p.
Lopukhin, I. V. (1860). Zapiski nekotorykh obstoyatel’stv zhizni i sluzhby deistvitel’nogo tainogo sovetnika, senatora I. V. Lopukhina, sochinennye im samim [Notes of Some Circumstances of Life and Service of I. V. Lopukhin, Active Privy Councilor and Senator Written by Himself]. Moscow, Universitetskaya tipografiya. 173 p.
Mertvago, D. B. (2006). Zapiski, 1760–1824 [Notes, 1760–1828]. St Petersburg, Russkaya simfoniya. 368 p.
Mesyatseslov s rospis’yu chinovnykh osob v gosudarstve na leto ot Rozhdestva Khristova 1795 [A Menologium with a List of Officials in the State in the Summer of 1795]. (1795). St Petersburg, Imperatorskaya Akademiya nauk. 423 p.
Mesyatseslov s rospis’yu chinovnykh osob, ili obshchii shtat Rossiiskoi imperii na leto ot Rozhdesta Khristova v 2 ch. [A Menologium with a List of Officials or the General Staff of the Russian Empire in the Summer of 1809. 2 Parts]. (1809). St Petersburg, Imperatorskaya Akademiya nauk. Part. 1. 539 p.
Mironov, B. N. (2015). Rossiiskaya imperiya: ot traditsii k modernu v 3 t. [Russian Empire: From Tradition to Modernity. 3 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin. Vol. 2. 912 p.
Mironov, B. N. (2018). Vzyatka kak forma oplaty truda chinovnikov v pervoi polovine XIX veka [Bribe as a Form of Remuneration of Officials in the First Half of the 19th Century]. In Dvornichenko, A. Yu. (Ed.). Mavrodinskie chteniya. Materialy vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 29–31 oktyabrya 2018 g. St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, pp. 311–314.
O’Neill, K. (2010). Rethinking Elite Integration: The Crimean Murzas and the Evolution of Russian Nobility. In Cahiers du monde russe. Vol. 51. No. 2/3, pp. 397–417.
Pisar’kova, L. F. (2012). Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie Rossii v pervoi chetverti XIX v.: zamysly, proekty, voploshchenie [State Administration of Russia in the First Quarter of the 19th Century: Ideas, Projects, Implementation]. Moscow, Novyi khronograf. 448 p.
PSZ [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Collection 1. Vol. 23, 27, 28, 33, 36.
Remnev, A. V. (2000). Regional’nye parametry imperskoi “geografii vlasti” (Sibir’ i Dal’nii Vostok) [Regional Parameters of the Imperial “Geography of Power” (Siberia and the Far East)]. In Ab Imperio. No. 3/4, pp. 343–358.
RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 1305. List 1. Dos. 1; Stock 1306. List 1. Dos. 1; Stock 1307. List 1. Dos. 6, 9, 10; Stock 1349. List 4. Dos. 70.
Schattenberg, S. (2005). Kul’tura korruptsii, ili K istorii rossiiskikh chinovnikov [Culture of Corruption, Or to the History of Russian Officials]. In Neprikosnovennyi zapas [website]. No. 4. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2005/4/kultura-korrupczii-ili-kistorii-rossijskih-chinovnikov.html (accessed: 20.04.2020).
Seredonin, S. M. (1902). Istoricheskii obzor deyatel’nosti Komiteta ministrov: k stoletiyu Komiteta ministrov (1802–1909) v 7 t. [Historical Review of the Committee of Ministers: On the Centenary of the Committee of Ministers (1802–1909). 7 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Kantselyariya Komiteta ministrov. Vol. 1. Komitet ministrov v tsarstvovanie imperatora Aleksandra Pervogo (1802 g. sentyabrya 8 – 1825 g. noyabrya 19). 608 p.
Weber, M. (1976). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. 5. revid. Auflage, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck. 948 S.
