The False Dmitry and James the Old Pretender: Mary Pix’s The Czar of Muscovy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.2.601Keywords:
Mary Pix, 17th-century Russia, 17th-century England, pretenders, Time of TroubleAbstract
The British dramatist Mary Pix’s (1666–1709) play The Czar of Muscovy (1701) has received limited and inconsistent critical attention compared to her other plays. This paper offers a fresh analysis of the play, which depicts the rule of the Russian pretender Dmitry Ivanovic, which lasted from 1605 to 1606 when he was killed in an uprising. The reading centralizes the history of false Dmitry during the Time of Troubles and his dramatic role as a figurative representation of the English Catholic pretender James Edward Francis Stuart (James the Old Pretender). Pix manipulates the public and private image of the False Dmitry (called Demetrius in the play) to undermine the Catholic pretender James’ claim to the English throne. This can be seen through a comparison of their public image and similar biographical details. Demetrius’ private image displays his tyranny and effeminacy, which are exposed through his treatment of the key women in his life: Queen Marina, his supposed mother Empress Sophia, and his captive Zarriana. In their own ways, the three women help him to reach the throne only to destroy him. Their dramatization as powerful agents who face oppression and achieve triumph is a message to Pix’s female audience to emulate the female characters and prevent the restoration of the pretender. Thus, Russian history emerges as a dynamic and unifying force that transcends time and geography.
References
Anderson, M. S. (2014). Peter the Great. L., Routledge. 244 p.
Anisimov, E. (2015). The Reforms of Peter the Great: Progress through Coercion in Russia. L., Routledge. 344 p.
Ashley, M. (1966). The Glorious Revolution of 1688. L., Hodder and Stoughton. 224 p.
Backscheider, P. (1993). Spectacular Politics: Theatrical Power and Mass Culture in Early Modern England. Baltimore, John Hopkins Univ. Press. 360 p.
Bartels, E. (1993). Spectacles of Strangeness. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Univ. Press. 234 p.
Beauvoir, S. (1972). The Second Sex. L., Penguin. 880 p.
Broad, J. (2015). The Philosophy of Mary Astell: An Early Modern Theory of Virtue. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. 205 p.
Bussow, C. (1994). The Disturbed State of the Russian Realm, 1617. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press. 288 p.
Cross, A. (2000). Peter the Great through British Eyes: Perception and Representation of the Tsar since 1698. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 172 p.
Cuder-Domingez, P. (2016). Stuart Women Playwrights, 1613–1713. L., Ashgate. 158 p.
Daems, J. (2006). Seventeenth Century Literature and Culture. L., Continuum. 160 p.
Dunning, Ch. (2001). Russia First Civil War: The Time of Trouble and the Founding of the Romanov Dynasty. Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Univ. Press. 672 p.
Edwards, C. (1993). The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 244 p.
Engelstein, L. (2003). Old and Low: Straw Horsemen of Russian Orthodoxy. In Kivelson, V. A., Greene, R. H. (Eds.). Orthodox Russia: Belief and Practice under the Tsars. Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, pp. 23–32.
Finberg, M. C. (2008). Introduction in Eighteenth-century Women Dramatists. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. 448 p.
Finke, L. (1984). The Satire of Women Writers: The Female Wits. In Restoration. Vol. 8. No. 2, pp. 64–71.
Glozier, M. (2007). Huguenot Soldiers in Russia: A Study in Military Competence. In Glozier, M., Onnekink, D. (Eds.). War, Religion and Service Huguenot Soldiering, 1685–1713. L., Routledge, pp. 229–244.
Gregg, E. (2001). Queen Anne. N. Haven, Yale Univ. Press. 483 p.
Haight, R. (2004). Christian Community in History: Historical Ecclesiology. N. Y., Continuum. 464 p.
Harris, T. (2006). The Revolution: The Great Crisis of the English Monarchy, 1685–1720. L., Penguin. 622 p.
Hensbergen, C. V. (2019). The Female Wits: Gender, Satire, Satire and Drama. In Bullard, P. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-century Satire. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 74–90.
Hosking, G. (2003). The State and Identity Formation in Russia: Historical Account. In Scharpe, F., Malfliet, K. (Eds.). The Concept of Russia Pattern for Political Development in Russian Federation. Leuven, Leuven Univ. Press, pp. 21–34.
Hughes, D. (1996). English Drama, 1660–1700. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 520 p.
Ihalainen, P. (2005). Protestant Nations Redefined: Changing Perceptions of National Identity in the Rhetoric of the English, Dutch and Swedish Public Churches, 1685–1772. Leiden, Brill. 664 p.
Ivanits, L. (1992). Russian Folk Belief. L., Routledge. 272 p.
Johnson, A. (2005). The Gender Knot: Unravelling our Patriarchal Legacy. Delhi, Pearson Ed.. 322 p.
Julicher, P. (2003). Renegades, Rebels and Rogues under the Tsars. L., McFarland and Company Publ. 318 p.
Kiste, V. D. (2008). William and Mary: Heroes of the Glorious Revolution. Stroud, Sutton Publ. 288 p.
Lenman, B. (1980). The Jacobite Risings in Britain 1689–1746. Methuen, Methuen Publ. 320 p.
Lynn, J. (2013). The Wars of Louis XIV, 1667–1714. L., Routledge. 421 p.
Marsden, J. (2006). Fatal Desires: Women, Sexuality and the English Stage, 1660–1720. L., Cornell Univ. Press. 232 p.
Mihoko, S. (2011). Recognizing Women’s Dramas as Political Writings: The Plays of 1701 by Wiseman, Pix and Trotter. In Women’s Writing. Vol. 18. No. 4, pp. 547–564.
Miller, J. (2000). James II. New Haven, Yale Univ. Press. 304 p.
Nolan, C. (2017). The Allure of Battle: A History of How Wars have been Won and Lost. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. 728 p.
O’Ciardha, E. (2002). Ireland and the Jacobite Cause, 1685–1766. Dublin, Four Courts. 468 p.
Orr, B. (2001). Empire on the English Stage. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 350 p.
Orr, B. (2020). British Enlightenment Theatre: Dramatizing Differences. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 285 p.
Owen, S. (1996). Restoration Theatre in Crisis. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 343 p.
Owen, S. (2002). Perspective on Restoration Drama. Manchester, Univ. of Manchester Press. 208 p.
Park, H. (1695). Lachryme Sacerdotis: A Pindarick Poem Occasion’d by the Death of that Most Excellent Princess, our Late Gracious Sovereign Lady, Mary the Second, of Glorious Memory. L., John Dunton. 8 p.
Pincus, S. (2011). 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven, Yale Univ. Press. 664 p.
Platonov, S. (1985). The Time of Troubles: A Historical Study of the Internal Crisis and Social Struggle in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth-century Muscovy. Kansas, Univ. of Kansas. 216 p.
Poe, M. T. (2018). A People Born to Slavery: Russia in Early Modern European Ethnography, 1476–1748. Ithaca, Cornwell Univ. Press. 312 p.
Pushkareva, N. (2015). Women in Russian History: From the Tenth to the Twentieth Century. L., Routledge. 300 p.
Rubik, M. (1998). Early Women Dramatist, 1550–1800. L., MacMillan. 225 p.
Smith, H. (2007). Mary Astell, А Serious Proposal to the Ladies (1694), and Anglican Reformation of Mannerism in Late Seventeenth-Century England. In Kolbrener, W., Michelson, M. (Eds.). Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith. L., Routledge, pp. 31–48.
Terpstra, N. (2019). Lives Uncovered: A Sourcebook of Early Modern Europe. Toronto, Univ. of Toronto Press. 304 p.
The London Gazette. (1685). No. 2051. 13 July.
Troost, W. (2017). William III: The Stadholder-King: A Political Biography. L., Routledge. 380 p.
Yebra, J. M. (2014). The Flourishing of Female Playwriting on the Augustan Stage: Mary Pix’s The Innocent Mistress. In J. of English Studies. Vol. 12, pp. 149–167.
