The Language of Smell in Vladimir Nabokov’s Mystical Discourse of Prose from His French Period

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.2.596

Keywords:

V. Nabokov, mystery, sensory imagery, olfactory hallucinations, smell images, smell language, perception

Abstract

This article focuses on the mystical connotations of the olfactory images in V. Nabokov’s prose from his French period (1937–1940). The authors analyse the connection between Nabokov’s mystical, philosophical, and aesthetic conceptions. They demonstrate that mystical experience is not conveyed by the writer directly but through the narration structure and forms of the mystical code in literature and philosophy (as in N. Gogol, P. Ouspensky, A. Bergson, etc.). The research refers to studies that prove the metafictional nature of Nabokov’s mysticism and its connection with perceptual imagery. As a result, the authors distinguish the ambivalent meaning of olfactory images. Smell is an element of the observer’s sensorial hallucination and a way in which the otherworld impacts on characters’ perception. On the other hand, images of smell are used to assess the ability of language to convey not only familiar smells, but also supersensory experiences. In Nabokov’s prose, the main smell characteristics are the temporal and spatial distance between the source and the subject of perception, the correlation with the observer’s viewpoint, and the peculiarities of nomination. More particularly, the magical meaning of smell images that create the plot for solipsistic characters is associated with the perception of the grotesque nature of smell. The authors conclude that mysticism is an attribute of Nabokov’s fictional world itself. The mystical connotations of smell lie in its transgressive and irrational forms: the fact that smell is difficult to verbalise is due to its ability to transcend the boundaries of fictional worlds, imaginary reality, and narration about it.

Author Biographies

Natalia Rogacheva

Dr. Hab. (Philology), Professor, University of Tyumen. 

23, Lenin Str., 625003, Tyumen, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0001-8424-1861

n.a.rogacheva@utmn.ru

Anastasia Drozdova

PhD Candidate, University of Tyumen.

23, Lenin Str., 625003, Tyumen, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0001-5728-142X

a.o.drozdova@utmn.ru

References

Alexandrov, V. E. (1995). Nabokov and Uspensky. In Alexandrov, V. E. (Ed.). The Garland Companion to Vladimir Nabokov. N. Y., Oxon, Routledge, pp. 548–553.

Averin, B. (2003). Dar Mnemoziny. Romany Nabokova v kontekste russkoi avtobiograficheskoi traditsii [The Gift of Mnemosyne: Nabokov’s Novels in the Context of the Russian Autobiographical Tradition]. St Petersburg, Amfora. 399 p.

Babikov, A. A. (2018). Pis’mo V. Nabokova k E. Malozemovoi [V. Nabokov’s Letter to E. Malozemova]. In Literaturnyi fakt. No. 10, pp. 385–392. DOI 10.22455/2541-8297-2018-10-385-392.

Barabtarlo, G. (2011). Sochinenie Nabokova [Nabokov’s Creation]. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbakha. 464 p.

Belyi, A. (1990). Nachalo veka. Vospominaniya v 3 kn. [The Beginning of the Century. 3 Books]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Book 2. 687 p.

Bouchet, M., Loison-Charles, J., Poulin, I. (2020). “Do the Senses Make Sense?”. An Introduction. In Bouchet, M., Loison-Charles, J., Poulin, I. (Eds.). The Five Senses in Nabokov’s Works. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2–11. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-45406-7_1.

Boyd, B. (2020). Senses, Minds, Meanings, and Values in Nabokov: Do the Senses Make Sense? In Bouchet, M., Loison-Charles, J., Poulin, I. (Eds.). The Five Senses in Nabokov’s Works. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–33. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-45406-7_2.

Buks, N. (1998). Eshafot v khrustal’nom dvortse. O russkikh romanakh Vladimira Nabokova [A Scaffold in a Crystal Palace. About Russian Novels by Vladimir Nabokov]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 208 p.

Connolly, J. W. (1992). Nabokov’s Early Fiction: Patterns of Self and Other. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 279 p.

Couturier, M. (2020). Sensuality and the Senses in Nabokov. In Bouchet, M., Loison-Charles, J., Poulin, I. (Eds.). The Five Senses in Nabokov’s Works. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–189. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-45406-7_11.

Dmitrienko, O. A. (2017). Poetika russkoyazychnoi prozy V. V. Nabokova reprezentatsiya religiozno-filosofskikh i religiozno-misticheskikh idei [The Poetics of V. V. Nabokov’s Russian-Language Prose: The Representation of Religious-Philosophical and Religious-Mystical Ideas]. Avtoref. … dokt. filol. nauk. St Petersburg, S. n. 36 p.

Dolinin, A. (2004). Istinnaya zhizn’ pisatelya Sirina. Raboty o Nabokove [The Real Life of Sirin the Writer: Works on Nabokov]. St Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt. 400 p.

Florensky, P. A. (1914). Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny: opyt pravoslavnoi teoditsei v dvenadtsati pis’makh [The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay on Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters]. Moscow, Tovarishchestvo tipografii A. I. Mamontova, 814 p.

Florensky, P. A. (1996). Izbrannye trudy po iskusstvu [Selected Works on Art]. Moscow, Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo. 333 p.

Grishakova, M. (2006). The Models of Space, Time and Vision in V. Nabokov’s Fiction: Narrative Strategies and Cultural Frames / ed. by S. Salupere. Tartu, Tartu Univ. Press. 322 p.

Hansen-Love, A. A. (2003). Russkii simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Mifopoeticheskii simvolizm. Kosmicheskaya simvolika [Russian Symbolism. The System of Poetic Motifs. Mythopoetic Symbolism. Cosmic Symbolism]. St Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt. 816 p.

James, W. (2017). Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyta. Issledovanie chelovecheskoi prirody [The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt. 415 p.

Kulakovskii, M. N. (2016). Odorativnaya leksika v lirike V. V. Nabokova [Smell Lexis in V. V. Nabokov’s Lyrical Poetry]. In Verhnevolzhskii filologicheskii vestnik. No. 2, pp. 17–22.

Kuperman, V., Zislin, I. (2003). Obonyanie kak instrument vizionera [Olfaction as a Visioner’s Tool]. In Vainshtein, O. B. (Ed.). Aromaty i zapakhi v kul’ture v 2 kn. [Fragrances and Smells in Culture. 2 Books]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. Book 1. pp. 206–213.

Mayakovski, V. V. (1957). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 13 t. [Complete Works. 13 Vols.]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury. Vol. 4. 451 p.

Metzger, S. (2020). Undulations and Vibrations, Tonalities and Harmonies: Nabokov, Acoustics and the Otherworld. In Bouchet, M., Loison-Charles, J., Poulin, I. (Eds.). The Five Senses in Nabokov’s Works. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 275–293. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-45406-7_17.

Meyer, P. (2002). Dolorous Haze, Hazel Shade: Nabokov and the Spirits. In Grayson, J., McMillin, A., Meyer, P. (Eds.). Nabokov’s World. 2 Vols. N. Y., Palgrave. Vol. 1. The Shape of Nabokov’s World, pp. 88–103.

Nabokov, V. V. (2002–2009). Sobranie sochinenii russkogo perioda v 5 t. [Collected Works of the Russian Period. 5 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Simpozium. Vol. 4. 784 p. Vol. 5. 832 p.

Nabokov, V. V. (2004). Sobranie sochinenii amerikanskogo perioda v 5 t. [Collected Works of the American Period. 5 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Simpozium. Vol. 1. 608 p.

Nabokov, V. V. (2016). Lektsii po russkoi literature [Lectures on Russian Literature]. St Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus. 448 p.

Ouspensky, P. D. (2000). Tertium Organum. “Klyuch k zagadkam mira” [Tertium Organum. “Key to the Mysteries of the World”]. Moscow, EKSMO-Press. 688 p.

Rutledge, S. D. (2011). Nabokov’s Permanent Mystery. The Expression of Metaphysics in His Work. Jefferson, North Carolina, L., McFarland and Company. 200 p.

Senderovich, S., Shvarts, E. (2000). The Ghost in the Novel: André Chénier in Vladimir Nabokov. In The Slavonic and East Europ. Rev. Vol. 78. No. 3, pp. 487–509.

Shakhovskaya, Z. (1981). V. I. Pol’ i “angel’skie stikhi” Vl. Nabokova [V. I. Pohl and Vladimir Nabokov’s “Angelic Verses”]. In Russkii al’manakh, pp. 231–235.

Sisson, J. B. (1994). Nabokov’s Cosmic Synchronization and “Something Else”. In Nabokov Studies. Vol. 1, pp. 155–177. DOI 10.1353/nab.2011.0097.

Stegner, P. (1967). Escape into Aesthetics: The Art of Vladimir Nabokov. L., Eyre and Spottiswoode. 141 p.

Toker, L. (2016). Nabokov: The Mystery of Literary Structures. Ithaca, L., Cornell Univ. Press. 243 p.

Willis, O. (2008). Printsipy organizatsii i funktsii gorodskogo prostranstva v rannei proze V. V. Nabokova berlinskogo perioda [Principles of the Organization and Functions of City Space in Nabokov’s Early Prose from the Berlin Period]. In Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 9: Filologiya. No. 3, pp. 62–68.

Zlochevskaya, A. V. (2014). Ot modernizma k metaproze XX v.: mistikometafiktsional’naya proza G. Gesse, V. Nabokova i M. Bulgakova (na materiale romanov “Stepnoi volk”, “Dar” i “Master i Margarita”) [From Modernism to Metaprose of the 20th Century: Mystical-Metafictional Prose of Hermann Hesse, Vladimir Nabokov, and Mikhail Bulgakov (with Reference to the Novel Steppenwolf, Gift, and The Master and Margarita)]. In Stephanos. No. 1 (3), pp. 164–177.

Published

2021-06-21

How to Cite

Rogacheva, N., & Drozdova, A. (2021). The Language of Smell in Vladimir Nabokov’s Mystical Discourse of Prose from His French Period. Quaestio Rossica, 9(2), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.2.596

Issue

Section

Problema voluminis