Cultural Mechanisms of Integrating the Ukrainian Cossaсk Elite into the Imperial Nobility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.1.461Keywords:
Ukraine; Little Russia; Russian state; integration; Ukrainian Cossack elite; noblemen’s education; Catherine IIAbstract
In this article, the author explores the degree of effectiveness of cultural mechanisms implemented in the integration of the Ukrainian Cossack elite into the all-imperial nobility. According to the author, the mid-eighteenth century became a milestone in updating cultural integration mechanisms. Using multiple examples, the author demonstrates how the Cossack elite actively broke away from their cultural provincialism, sending their children to educational institutions of the imperial capitals, and subsequently replenished and formed the imperial noble intellectual elite. The author explains such changes by the influence of European ideological transfer, which led to the transformation of the worldview of the Russian ruling elite, and then, during the reign of Peter I, to the transformation of the Russian imperial court into one of the leading courts of Europe. The result of the said sociocultural processes was the transformation of the capital’s cultural and educational institutions into new centres for attracting leading Western professors and Ukrainian youth, who were looking for opportunities for creative and professional self-realisation. According to the author, another important incentive for the Cossack elite was the political ascent of two ordinary Ukrainian Cossacks, the brothers Alexei and Cyril Razumovsky. The Razumovsky brothers became a part of the new nobility, who ascended to power during the reign of Elizabeth Petrovna. For this reason, they became a key cultural channel of the new European worldview for the Cossack elite of Little Russia and an important resource for entering imperial educational institutions and forming the imperial nobility from the Cossack elite. Further, a debatable opinion is expressed in the text of the article, according to which the “Enlightenment discourse” characteristic of Russia and Europe of the time became the main cultural mechanism for the integration of the Cossack elite. According to this “Enlightenment Discourse”, at the top of the hierarchy of rationality, there was an enlightened cosmopolitan, an imperial nobleman, a member of a supranational community. The author maintains that the existence of such cultural mechanisms allowed the Cossack elite to break away relatively easily from their former Cossack identity.
References
Andreev, A. Yu. (2005). Russkie studenty v nemetskikh universitetatkh XVIII – pervoi poloviny XIX veka [Russian Students in German Universities of the 18th – First Half of the 19th Centuries]. Moscow, Znak. 432 p.
Bugrov, K. D., Kiselev, M. A. (2016) Estestvennoe pravo i dobrodetel': integratsiya evropeiskogo vliyaniya v rossiiskuyu politicheskuyu kul'turu XVIII veka [Natural Law and Virtue: Integration of European Influence into the Russian Political Culture of the 18th Century]. Yekaterinburg, Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta. 476 p.
Das Album der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel. 1665–1865. (1915). Kiel, Verlag von Lipsius ; Tischer. 709 S.
Dnevnik general'nogo khoruzhago Nikolaya Khanenka, 1723–1753 [Diary of General Ensign Nikolai Khanenko, 1723–1753]. (1884). Kiev, Tipografiya G. T. Korchak-Novitskogo. 524 p.
Dzyuba, O. M. (2012). Privatne zhittya kozats'koї starshini XVІІІ st. (na materіalakh epіstolyarnoї spadshchini) [The Private Life of the Cossack Elder of the 18th Century (with Reference to Epistolary Heritage)]. Kiїv, Institut istoriї Ukraїni. 347 p.
Erler, G. (Hrsg). (1911–1912). Die Matrikel der Albertus-Universität zu Königsberg in Preußen. Bd. 2. Die Immatrikulationen von 1657–1829. Leipzig, Verlag von Duncker ; Humblot. 772 S.
Fedyukin, I. I. (2018). “Ot oboikh istinnoe shlyakhetstvo”: sukhoputnyi shlyakhetskii kadetskii korpus i konstruirovanie poslepetrovskoi elity, 1731–1762 [“From Both True Nobility”: The Noble Inland Cadet Corps and the Construction of the Post-Petrine Elite, 1731–1762]. In Rjeoutski, W. S., Fedyukin, I. I., Berelovich, V. (Eds.). Ideal vospitaniya dvoryanstva v Evrope: XVII–XIX veka. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 245–273.
Gorlenko, V. (Ed.). (1893). Iz istorii yuzhno-russkogo obshchestva nachala XIX veka (pis'ma V. I. Charnysha, A. I. Chepy, V. G. Poletiki i zametki k nim, s portretom V. G. Poletiki) [From the History of South-Russian Society of the Early 19th Century (Letters by V. I. Charnysh, A. I. Chepa, V. G. Poletika and Notes to Them, with a Portrait of V. G. Poletika)]. Kiev, Tipografiya G. T. Korchak-Novitskogo. 36, 14 p.
Kiselev, M. A. (2017). Traktat De L’Esprit des Lois Sh.-L. Montesk'e i fundamental'nye zakony v Rossii nachala 1760-kh gg. [Montesquieu’s Treatise De L’esprit des Lois and Fundamental Laws in Russia in the Early 1760s]. In Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 5. No. 4, pp. 1131–1148. DOI 10.15826/qr.2017.4.271.
Kiselev, M. A., Lazarev, Ya. A. (2019). "Poeliku de v Maloi Rossii net dvoryan"? Status ukrainskogo “shlyakhetstva” v Rossiiskoi imperii serediny XVIII v. i rol' neformal'nykh svyazei K. G. Razumovskogo [“Are There Nobles in Little Russia”? The Status of the Ukrainian “Shlyakhetstvo” in the Russian Empire in the Mid‑18th Century and the Role of the Informal Relations of K. G. Razumovsky]. In Novoe proshloe / The New Past. No. 2, pp. 116–133. DOI 10.23683/2500–3224–2019–2–116–133.
Kiselev, M. A., Lystsova, A. S. (2018). Problema dvoryanskogo obrazovaniya v publitsistike i v pravitel'stvennoi politike Rossiiskoi imperii na rubezhe 1750-kh i 1760-kh godov [The Problem of Noble Education in Journalism and in the Government Policy of the Russian Empire at the Turn of the 1760s]. In Rjeoutski, W. S., Fedyukin, I. I., Berelovich, V. (Eds.). Ideal vospitaniya dvoryanstva v Evrope: XVII–XIX veka. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 152–180.
Nakazy malorossiiskim deputatam 1767 goda i akty o vyborakh deputatov v Komissiyu sochineniya Ulozheniya [Proposals to Little Russian Deputies of 1767 and Acts on the Election of Deputies to the Commission]. Kiev, Tipografiya G. T. Korchak-Novitskogo. 320 p.
NIA SPbII RAN [Scientific-Historical Archive of the St Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Stock 36. List 1. Dos. 1134.
Posokhova, L. Yu. (2016). Pravoslavnye kollegiumy na peresechenii kul'tur, traditsii, epokh (konets XVII – nachalo XIX v.) [Orthodox Collegia at the Intersection of Cultures, Traditions, and Eras (Late 17th – Early 19th Centuries)]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 550 p.
Propozitsii Fedora Saltykova. Rukopis' iz sobraniya P. N. Tikhanova [Proposals of Fyodor Saltykov. Manuscript from the Collection of P. N. Tikhanov]. (1891). St Petersburg, Obshchestvo lyubitelei drevnosti. [2], XXVII, [3], 36 p.
RGADA [The Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts]. Stock 248. Dos. 3017, 3217.
Rudnev, D. V. (2015). Grigorii Andreevich Poletika i ego pedagogicheskaya deyatel'nost' [Gregory Andreevich Poletika and His Teaching Activity]. In Fedyukin, I. I., Lavrinovich, M. B. (Ed.). „Regulyarnaya akademiya uchrezhdena budet…”. Obrazovatel'nye proekty v Rossii v pervoi polovine XVIII veka. Moscow, Novoe izdatel'stvo, pp. 363–399.
Sb. RIO [Collection of the Imperial Russian Historical Society]. Vol. 117, 126.
Slovar' pisatelei XVIII veka. Vyp. 1–3 [Dictionary Writers of the 18th Century. 1–3 Iss.]. Leningrad, St Petersburg, Nauka. Iss. 1. 356 p. Iss. 2. 507 p. Iss. 3. 470 p.
Smolii, W. (Ed.). (2018). Ukraїns'kii Get'manat: narisi іstorії natsіonal'nogo derzhavotvorennya XVII–XVIII st. u 2 kn. [The Ukrainian Hetmanate: Essays on the History of National State-Building in the 17th–18th Centuries. 2 Books]. Kiїv, Іnstitut іstorії Ukraїni. Book 2. 580 p.
