The Service Records of Heads of Departments and Members of the State Council: The Problem of Source Reliability

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.3.718

Keywords:

Russian Empire in the 18th – 20th centuries, State Council, service records, officialdom, ministers

Abstract

This study focuses on service records, a mass source of government records management in the Russian Empire between the eighteenth and early twentieth centuries. The service record was a document containing basic biographical information about the official (surname, first name, patronymic, age, social origin, religion, education. Also, the document reflected whether the official had real estate, their marital status, children, stages of service, awards, penalties, etc.). For government agencies, service records were the main source of information and a means of controlling officials, and for officials themselves – certificates attesting to their abilities, experience, and impeccable reputation. The analysis of historiography on the issue demonstrates, on the one hand, that service records are a source that is in high demand by researchers. At the same time, the uncritical approach to these documents still prevails in historical studies. The valuable information they contain is used without comparison with data from other sources, without identifying and analysing materials that clarify the bureaucratic process of creating service records. As a result, experts do not have satisfactorily reasoned ideas about the completeness and reliability of this type of source. The article attempts to answer these questions by referring to personal service documentation of heads of departments (ministers and chief executives) and members of the State Council (about 600 persons in total). The author considers the legislation on service records and points out problems that arose in providing reliable information for them. The information of various sections of the service records is compared with data from other sources – metric books, personal decrees, supreme orders on the civil department, personal files of officials, and published lists of officials. The author concludes that the information from different sections of the service records is not equally reliable, and that the completeness and accuracy of the source in the state records management of the Russian Empire varied depending on the order of data collection and control over the process by the government.

Author Biography

Denis Shilov

PhD (History), Senior Researcher, National Library of Russia.

18, Sadovaya Str., 191069, St Petersburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-4766-8206

shildn@mail.ru

References

Dahl, V. I. (1907–1909). Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka v 4 t. [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language. 4 Vols.]. 3rd Ed. St Petersburg, Moscow, Tovarishchestvo M. O. Wolff. Vol. 3. 1782 columns. Vol. 4. 1621 columns.

Dubentsov, B. B., Kulikov, S. V. (1999). Sotsial’naya evolyutsiya vysshei tsarskoi byurokratii vo vtoroi polovine XIX – nachale XX v. (Itogi i perspektivy izucheniya) [Social Evolution of the Highest Tsarist Bureaucracy in the Second Half of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries (Results and Prospects of Study)]. In Tsamutali, A. N. (Ed.). Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi i politicheskoi istorii Rossii XIX–XX vekov. Sbornik statei. St Petersburg, Aleteiya, pp. 63–86.

Elpat’evskii, A. V. (1974). Dokumentirovanie prokhozhdeniya gosudarstvennoi sluzhby v Rossii XVIII – nachala XX v. [Documenting Public Service in Russia of the 18th – Early 20th Centuries]. In Trudy Vserossiiskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta dokumentovedeniya i arkhivnogo dela. Vol. 5. Part 1, pp. 146–206.

Ivanov, V. A. (1994). Gubernskoe chinovnichestvo 50–60-kh gg. XIX v. v Rossii (po materialam Moskovskoi i Kaluzhskoi gubernii): istoriko-istochnikovedcheskie ocherki [Provincial Officialdom of the 1850s–1860s in Russia (Based on the Materials of Moscow and Kaluga Provinces): Essays on Historical and Source Studies]. Kaluga, Kaluzhskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii institut. 231 p.

Ivanov, V. A. (2012). O dostovernosti svedenii formulyarnykh spiskov sluzhashchikh mestnykh gosudarstvennykh uchrezhdenii Rossiiskoi imperii. Vtoraya polovina XVIII – nachalo XX v. [On the Reliability of the Information in the Form Lists of Employees of Local State Institutions of the Russian Empire. The Second Half of the 18th – Early 20th Centuries]. In Vestnik arkhivista. No. 4, pp. 30–39.

Kandaurova, T. N. (2020). Dokumenty departamentskogo deloproizvodstva kak informatsionnyi resurs formirovaniya kollektivnoi biografii i sotsiokul’turnogo portreta voennoi byurokratii XIX v.: posluzhnye spiski i nagradnye materialy [Documents of Departmental Office Work as an Information Resource for the Formation of a Collective Biography and a Socio-Cultural Portrait of the Military Bureaucracy of the 19th Century: Service Records and Award Materials]. In Wschodni rocznik humanistyczny. No. 1, pp. 93–111. DOI 10.36121/tkandaurowa.17.2020.1.093.

Kunavin, K. S. (2019). Formulyarnyi spisok kak istochnik o sluzhbe chinovnika XIX veka: epizod iz biografii B. P. Mansurova [The Form List as a Source about the Service of an Official of the 19th Century: An Episode from the Biography of B. P. Mansurov]. In Rumyantsevskie chteniya – 2019. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (23–24 aprelya 2019) v 3 ch. Moscow, Pashkov dom. Part 2, pp. 99–103.

Liven, D. (2018). Rossiiskaya grazhdanskaya sluzhba pri Nikolae II: variatsii na byurokraticheskuyu temu [The Russian Civil Service under Nicholas II: Variations on the Bureaucratic Theme]. In Russkii sbornik. Moscow, Modest Kolerov. Vol. 26, pp. 503–560.

Malkova, Z. I., Plyukhina, M. A. (1967). Dokumenty vysshikh i tsentral’nykh uchrezhdenii XIX – nachala XX v. kak istochnik biograficheskikh svedenii [Documents of Higher and Central Institutions of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries as a Source of Biographical Information]. In Firsov, I. N. (Ed.). Nekotorye voprosy izucheniya istoricheskikh dokumentov XIX – nachala XX v. Sbornik statei. Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, pp. 204–228.

PSZ [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire, since 1649]. Collection 1. Vol. 16, 25, 26.

PSZ [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire, since 1649]. Collection 2. Vol. 2, 3, 6 (Part 1), 10 (Part 1).

RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 733. List 120. Dos. 332; Stock 1162. List 1 (Otdelenie del gosudarstvennogo sekretarya). 1841. Dos. 6; List 6. Dos. 14, 77, 86, 134, 194, 198, 233, 255, 263, 294, 313, 316, 331, 336, 337, 343, 347, 354, 400, 452, 454, 477, 505, 507, 519, 533, 543, 611, 628, 859, 861; Stock 1343. List 46. Dos. 1183; Stock 1349. List 4. 1835. Dos. 165. Part 1; Stock 1405. List 44. Dos. 1477.

RGVIA [Russian State Military-Historical Archive]. Stock 489. List 1. Dos. 7062.

Rukopisnyi otdel Pushkinskogo Doma [Manuscript Department of the Pushkin House]. Stock 320. No. 3081.

Savitskii, I. V. (2018). Genealogicheskie istochniki o dvoryanstve i chinovnichestve Evropeiskogo Severa Rossii XIX veka [Genealogical Sources about the Nobility and Bureaucracy of the European North of Russia of the 19th Century]. Petrozavodsk, Izdatel’stvo Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 46 p.

Shilov, D. N. (1998). Ministry dorevolyutsionnoi Rossii: istoriko-sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie [Ministers of Pre-Revolutionary Russia: A Historical and Sociological Study]. In Klio. No. 3, pp. 123–136.

Shilov, D. N. (2011). Osnovnye dokumenty i spravochniki o grazhdanskikh chinovnikakh v Rossii (konets XVIII – nachalo XX vv.): kratkii obzor [Basic Documents and Reference Books about Civil Officials in Russia (Late 18th – Early 20th Centuries): A Brief Overview]. In Vestnik Chelyabinskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii kul’tury i iskusstv. No. 1, pp. 90–95.

Shilov, D. N. (2014). Kogda rodilsya Konstantin Petrovich Pobedonostsev? (Zametki o metodike biograficheskogo issledovaniya) [When Was Konstantin Petrovich Pobedonostsev Born? (Notes on the Methodology of Biographical Research)]. In Peterburgskii istoricheskii zhurnal. No. 2, pp. 53–63.

Tselorungo, D. G. (2002). Ofitsery russkoi armii – uchastniki Borodinskogo srazheniya: istoriko-sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie [Officers of the Russian Army, Participants of the Battle of Borodino: A Historical and Sociological Study]. Moscow, Kalita. 367 p.

TsGIA [Central State Historical Archive of St Petersburg]. Stock 355. List 1. Dos. 2411.

Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (1978). Pravitel’stvennyi apparat samoderzhavnoi Rossii v XIX v. [The Government Apparatus of Autocratic Russia in the 19th Century]. Moscow, Mysl’. 288 p.

Published

2022-08-08

How to Cite

Shilov, D. (2022). The Service Records of Heads of Departments and Members of the State Council: The Problem of Source Reliability. Quaestio Rossica, 10(3), 1104–1120. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.3.718

Issue

Section

Disputatio