The Russian Question at the Entente Conference in Cannes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.2.698Keywords:
“Russian question”, international relations, international consortium, reparations, tsarist debts, Cannes Conference, Entente, Lloyd George, Aristide BriandAbstract
This article aims to explore the significance of the “Russian question” at the Entente conference in Cannes, putting it into the European political context of October 1921 – January 1922. The author pays special attention to the two important rounds of the international negotiations, i. e., to the Anglo-French discussions in London in December 1921 and to the meeting of the Entente Supreme Council in Cannes itself (6–13 January 1922). The “Russian question” was one of the three key topics of these conferences; however, to the other matters (German reparations and Anglo-French security pact), it is under-researched. Besides the published diplomatic documents, the author refers to new evidence drawn from the national archives of France, Great Britain, and Belgium. The article concludes that the negotiations in London and Cannes mirrored the “Russian question”, as it stood in European politics at the end of 1921 and the beginning of 1922. D. Lloyd George, UK prime minister and initiator of the Genoa conference, was eager to use the “Russian question” as a means to further British interests, transform the Soviet regime, and reconstruct and appease Europe. It involved reducing tensions as a result of a non-aggression pact that did not impose any obligations on the UK in Eastern Europe. From the trade and economic points of view, the emphasis was put on the international consortium aimed at consolidating Western business in Russia, giving German industry leadership in the field. Nevertheless, an important part of eventual German profits in Russia would go to France and the UK as reparations. The development of the Cannes conference, which resulted in the resignation of the French cabinet led by A. Briand, showed that the “Russian question” was not only a topic of high politics, but also directly concerned the wider public and elites. Accelerating Briand’s dismissal, Lloyd George found a more stubborn opponent in his successor, R. Poincaré. As the prologue to Genoa, the Cannes meeting outlined some of its future problems as well.
References
Arshintseva, O. A. (2004). Evropeiskaya politika Anglii i Genuezskaya konferentsiya 1922 g. [The European Policy of England and the Genoa Conference in 1922]. In Izvestiya Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 4 (34), pp. 22–26.
Baechler, Ch. (Ed.). (2005a). Documents diplomatiques français. 1920–1932. Bruxelles, P. I. E. Lang. Vol. 2. 847 p. (DDF).
Baechler, Ch. (Ed.). (2005b). Documents diplomatiques français. 1921. Annexes. Bruxelles, P. I. E. Lang. 963 p. (DDF).
Baechler, Ch. (Ed.). (2005b). Documents diplomatiques français. 1922. Bruxelles, P. I. E. Lang. Vol. 1. 837 p. (DDF).
Bonvech, B., Galaktionov, Yu. V. (Eds.). (2008). Istoriya Germanii v 3 t. [History of Germany. 3 Vols.]. Moscow, KDU. Vol. 3. 592 p.
Budnitskii, O. V. (Ed.). (2001). “Sovershenno lichno i doveritel’no!”: B. A. Bakhmetev – V. A. Maklakov. Perepiska v 3 t. [“Strictly Personal and Confidential!”: B. A. Bakhmetev – V. A. Maklakov. Correspondence. 3 Vols.]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. Vol. 2. 672 p.
Conseil des ministres, 16 janvier 1922. In Les archives de l’État en Belgique [website]. URL: http://extranet.arch.be/510_1527_000_B/510_1527_000_04611_000/510_1527_000_-04611_000_00_0159.pdf (accessed: 13.02.2022).
Conseil des ministres, 28 décembre 1921. In Les archives de l’État en Belgique [website]. URL: http://extranet.arch.be/510_1527_000_B/510_1527_000_04611_000/510_1527_000_04611_000_00_0120.pdf (accessed: 13.02.2022).
Dokumenty vneshnei politiki SSSR v 24 t. [Documents on Soviet Foreign Policy. 24 Vols.]. (1957–2000). Moscow, Politizdat. Vol. 4. 836 p. Vol. 5. 807 p. (DVP SSSR).
Fink, C. (1993). The Genoa Conference: European Diplomacy, 1921–1922. Syracuse, Syracuse Univ. Press. 365 p.
Foreign Relations of the United States. 375 Vols. Washington, GPO, 1938. Vol. 1. 1075 p. (FRUS).
Himmer, R. (1976). Rathenau, Russia, and Rapallo. In Central Europ. History. Vol. 9. No. 2, pp. 146–183.
Hogenhuis-Seliverstoff, A. (1991). French Plans for the Reconstruction of Russia: A History and Evaluation. In Fink, C., Frohn, A., Heideking, J. (Eds.). Genoa, Rapallo, and European Reconstruction in 1922. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 131–148.
Hormach, I. (2020). Sovetskoe gosudarstvo na mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii v Genue po ekonomicheskim i finansovym voprosam. 10 aprelya – 19 maya 1922 goda [The Soviet State at the International Conference in Genoa on Economic and Financial Matters, 10 April – 19 May 1922]. In Novaya i noveishaia istoriia. No. 3, pp. 80–106. DOI 10.31857/S013038640009146-8.
Loucheur, L. (1962). Carnets secrets. Bruxelles, Brepols. 189 p.
Magadeev, I. E. (2021). V teni Pervoi mirovoi voiny: dilemmy evropeiskoi bezopasnosti v 1920-e gody [In the Shadow of the First World War: Dilemmas of European Security in the 1920s.]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ. 864 p.
Medlicott, W. et al. (Eds.). (1919–1974). Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919–1939. Ser. 1. L., HMSO. Vol. 15. 835 p. Vol. 19. 1138 p. (DBFP).
Orde, A. (2002). British Policy and European Reconstruction after the First World War. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 357 p.
Pavlov, A. Yu. (Ed.). (2021). Vrag, protivnik, soyuznik? Rossiya vo vneshnei politike Frantsii v 1917–1924 gg. v 2 t. [Enemy, Rival, or Ally? Russia in French Foreign Policy, 1917–1924. 2 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Russkaya khristianskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya. Vol. 2. 892 p.
Sergeev, E. Yu. (2019). Bol’sheviki i anglichane. Sovetsko-britanskie otnosheniya, 1918–1924 gg.: ot interventsii k priznaniyu [The Bolsheviks and the British. Soviet-British Relations, 1918–1924: From Intervention to Recognition]. St Petersburg, Nauka. 831 p.
Shishkin, V. A. (1969). Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i strany Zapada v 1917–1923 gg. [The Soviet State and the Western Countries in 1917–1923]. Leningrad, Nauka. 440 p.
Steiner, Z. (2005). The Lights That Failed: European International History 1919–1933. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. 956 p.
TNA. Cabinet Office 23/27, 24/131, 24/132, 31/11.
Volkov, S. (2012). Walther Rathenau: Weimar’s Fallen Statesman. N. Haven, Yale Univ. Press. 256 p.
White, S. (1985). The Origins of Détente: The Genoa Conference and Soviet-Western Relations, 1921–1922. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 255 p.
