Volost Clerks in Judicial Bureaucracy: The Myths and Reality of Post-Reform Russia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.1.666

Keywords:

history of nineteenth-century Russia, volost clerk, volost court, volost justice, peasant self-government

Abstract

Historiography has formed polar assessments of the activity carried out by members of the system of local (volost) self-government in the post-reform period of the Russian Empire. Working within the paradigm of historical anthropology, the author tries to analyse the activity of volost clerks in court through the study of analytical reports made by governors about the system of peasant selfgovernment. The study focuses on previously unpublished confidential reports of governors to the ministers of Internal Affairs P. A. Valuev in 1863–1864 and D. A. Tolstoy in 1883–1884. Most of these documents are now kept in the funds of the local administration department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (1291) and the office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (1282) of the Russian State Historical Archive. Governors had a rather negative idea of volost clerks, attributing most of the problems of local government to the low quality of clerk personnel, who were prone to theft, bribery, and deceit. In the early 1860s, the governors dealt with difficult issues of administrating rural areas and offered promising “recipes” of modernisation of the whole system of peasant self-government and attracting young well-educated clerks to the service. However, two decades later, questions about the reorganisation of volost clerks disappeared from the reports, and nonobjective criticism dominated the secret messages of the governors, who seemed to be eager to delegate all such problems of self-government to the lower-ranking officials who worked directly in volost councils. Despite critical assessments, regional officials realised the significance of well-educated clerks who recorded court proceedings, which allowed peasants to appeal against sentences in a court of cassation. Volost justice, which occupied a special place in the system of the Russian jurisdiction, gradually uncovered the multifaceted world of traditional law, because it was Russian volost clerks who gradually, year after year, created one of the most important mass sources, the decisions of volost courts reflecting the course of court hearings. This fact facilitated the gradual incorporation of usual law post-reform institutions into the system of local judicial bodies, which worked in post-reform Russia based on positive law.

Author Biography

Ivan Popp

PhD (History), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Scientific, Educational and Design Activities, Ural State Pedagogical University.

26, Kosmonavtov Ave., 620091, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-5257-1126

popp82@mail.ru

References

Astyrev, N. M. (1904). V volostnykh pisaryakh. Ocherki krest’yanskogo samoupravleniya [On Volost Clerks: Essays on Peasant Self-Government]. 3rd Ed. Moscow, Magazin “Knizhnoe delo”. 351 p.

Barinov, V. V. (2013) Sistema organov volostnoi yustitsii na territorii respubliki Mordoviya v kontse XIX – nachale XX veka (po materialam Penzenskoi i Tambovskoi gubernii) [The System of Local Judicial Bodies on the Territory of the Republic of Mordovia in the Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries (with Reference to Materials from Penza and Tambov Provinces)]. In Rossiiskii nauchnyi mir. No. 1, pp. 24–36.

Bezgin, V. B. (2004). Sel’skaya vlast’ v obydennom vospriyatii krest’yanstva kontsa XIX – XX vv. [Rural Power in the Everyday Perception of the Peasantry in the Late 19th – 20th Centuries]. In Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. No. 4-2. Vol. 10, pp. 1217–1226.

Burbank, J. (2003). Pravovaya reforma i pravovaya kul’tura: nepriznannyi uspekh volostnykh sudov v imperskoi Rossii [Legal Reform and Legal Culture: The Unrecognised Success of Volost Courts in Imperial Russia]. In Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie. No. 2 (247), pp. 188–196.

Burbank, J. (2004). Mestnye study, imperskoe pravo i grazhdanstvo v Rossii [Local Courts, Imperial Law, and Citizenship in Russia]. In Rossiiskaya imperiya v sravnitel’noi perspektive. Sbornik statei. Moscow, pp. 320–358.

Burbank. J. (2004). Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905–1917. Bloomington, Indianapolis, Indiana Univ. Press. 374 p.

Burlova, G. V. (2011). Pravovye aspekty deyatel’nosti volostnykh i sel’skikh dolzhnostnykh lits krest’yanskogo samoupravleniya vo vtoroi polovine XIX v. [Legal Aspects of the Activities of Township and Rural Officials of Peasant Self-Government in the Second Half of the 19th Century]. In Istoricheskie, filosofskie. politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. No. 8-3, pp. 47–52.

Druzhinin, N. M. (1978). Russkaya derevnya na perelome 1861–1880 gg. [The Russian Village at the Turn of 1861–1880s]. Moscow, Nauka. 287 p.

Ekaterinburgskaya nedelya [Ekaterinburgskaya nedelya]. (1884). No. 47. 28 Nov.

Frierson, C. A. (1997). “I Must Always Answer to the Law…” Rules and Responses in the Reformed Volost’ Court”. In The Slavonic and East Europ. Rev. Vol. 75. No. 2, pp. 308–334.

GAPK [State Archives of Perm Province]. Stock 41. List 1. Dos. 16; List 2. Dos. 166; Stock 142. List 1. Dos. 602, 666, 798, 851, 1661.

GASh [State Archives of Shadrinsk]. Stock 597. List 1. Dos. 56.

Golos. Gazeta politicheskaya i literaturnaya [Voice. Political and Literary Newspaper]. (1873). No. 95. 5 (17) April.

Khaibullin, A. R. (2011). Doreformennyi notariat na mestnom urovne [The Pre-Reform Notary at the Local Level]. In Vestnik Vostochnoi ekonomiko-yuridicheskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. No. 6, pp. 151–155.

Khristoforov, I. A. (2011). Sud’ba reformy. Russkoe krest’yanstvo v pravitel’stvennoi politike do i posle otmeny krepostnogo prava (1830–1890-e gg.) [The Fate of the Reform. The Russian Peasantry in Government Policy before and after the Abolition of Serfdom (1830s–1890s)]. Moscow, Sobraniye. 367 p.

Kornilov, A. A. (2012). Krest’yanskoe samoupravlenie po polozheniyu 19 fevralya [Peasant Self-Government under the Regulation of February 19]. In Velikaya reforma. Russkoe obshchestvo i krest’yanskii vopros v proshlom i nastoyashchem v 2 kn. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom TONChU. Book 2, pp. 718–739.

Minakov, A. S. (2009). Vsepoddanneishie otchety o sostoyanii gubernii, oblastei i gradonachal’stv Rossiiskoi imperii: problema arkhivnoi evristiki [The Reports to the Monarch on the State of the Provinces, Regions and City Administrations of the Russian Empire: Issues of Archival Heuristics]. In Otechestvennye arkhivy. No. 1, pp. 28–36.

Nikitina, N. P. (2014). Volostnye pisari v sotsial’nom prostranstve pskovskoi derevni vtoroi poloviny XIX – nachala XX vv. [Volost Clerks in the Social Space of Pskov Villages in the Second Half of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. In Pskov. Nauchno-prakticheskii istoriko-kraevedcheskii zhurnal. No. 41, pp. 42–49.

Po voprosu o preobrazovanii volostnykh sudov [To the Question of Transformation of Volost Courts]. (1873). In Otechestvennye zapiski. No 1, pp. 85–92.

Popp, I. A. (2014). A. K. Anastas’ev [A. K. Anastas’ev]. In Voprosy istorii. No. 2, pp. 82–90.

Preniya po referatu M. V. Krasovskogo „O nedostatkakh nyneshnego ustroistva mirovykh sudebnykh ustanovlenii v otnoshenii ugolovnoi yustitsii” (V. I. Likhachev, N. B. Khvostov, M. V. Krasovskii) [Debate on On the Shortcomings of the Current Structure of World Judicial Rulings in Relation to Criminal Justice, a Review of M. V. Krasovsky (V. I. Likhachev, N. B. Khvostov, M. V. Krasovsky)]. (1885). In Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava. No. 5, pp. 46–84.

PSZ [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Coll. 2. Vol. 36, 49.

RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 1282. List 2. Dos. 12–15; Stock 1291. List 36. 1863 g. Dos. 140b; List 36. 1867 g. Dos. 14; List 37. 1873 g. Dos. 97; Stock 1405. List 86. Dos. 2949.

Shishkareva, T. N. (2013). Volostnye pisari Kurskoi gubernii v poreformennyi period [Volost Clerks of Kursk Province in the Post-Reform Period] In Progressivnye tekhnologii razvitiya. No. 11, pp. 85–87.

Shutilo, O. V., Selezneva, N. M. (2017). Volostnaya yustitsiya v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX veka [Volost Justice in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th Century]. In Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. No. 4 (117), pp. 188–194.

Skorobogatyi, P. (1880). Ustroistvo krest’yanskikh sudov [The Structure of Peasant Courts]. Moscow, Tipografiya A. I. Mamontova i Co. 68 p.

Skorobogatyi, P. (1882). Ocherki krest’yanskogo suda [Essays on Peasant Courts]. Moscow, Yuridicheskii vestnik. 101 p.

Sosnina, M. A. (2017). Protokoly volostnykh sudov kak istochnik izucheniya krest’yanskogo pravosudiya vtoroi poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka (na materialakh Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Arkhangel’skoi oblasti) [Proceedings of Volost Courts as a Source of Study of Peasant Justice of the Second Half of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries (Based on Materials of the State Archive of Arkhangelsk Region)]. In Dulov, A. N., Rumyantseva, M. F. (Eds.). Aktual’nye problemy istochnikovedeniya: materialy IV mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii k 420-letiyu darovaniya gorodu Vitebsku magdeburgskogo prava, Vitebsk, 20–21 aprelya 2017 g. Vitebsk, Vitebskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, pp. 205–206.

Trudy komissii po preobrazovaniyu volostnykh sudov. Otzyvy razlichnykh mest i lits [Reports of the Commission for the Transformation of Rural Municipal Courts. Reviews of Various Places and Persons]. (1873). St Petersburg, S. n. Vol. 7. 656 p.

Volostnoi pisar’. Dlya narodnogo chteniya [The Volost Clerk. For Public Reading]. (1867). Irkutsk, S. n. 5 p.

Yanovich, V. (1902). Itogi shestiletiya (zametki zemskogo nachal’nika) [Results of the Sixth Anniversary (Notes of a Zemstvo Chief)]. Perm, Tipolitografiya gubernskogo pravleniya. 178 p.

Yazykov, A. I. (1886). O preobrazovanii volostnogo suda. Doklad deistvitel’nogo chlena yuridicheskogo obshchestva pri Imperatorskom Sankt-Peterburgskom universitete v zasedanii Administrativnogo otdeleniya obshchestva 12 yanvarya 1885 g. [About the Transformation of the Volost Court. Report of a Full Member of the Legal Society at the Imperial St Petersburg University at the Meeting of the Administrative Department of the Society on 12 January 1885]. St Petersburg. 40 p.

Yuridicheskoye obrazovanie nashikh mirovykh sudei [The Legal Education of Our Magistrates]. (1887). In Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava. No. 1, pp. 185–187.

Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (1964). Krizis samoderzhaviya na rubezhe 1870–1880-kh godov [The Crisis of Autocracy at the Turn of the 1880s]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 511 p.

Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (1970). Rossiiskoe samoderzhavie v kontse XIX stoletiya (politicheskaya reaktsiya 80-kh – nachala 90-kh godov) [The Russian Autocracy at the End of the 19th Century (Political Reaction of the 1880s – Early 1890s)]. Moscow, Mysl’. 444 p.

Zemtsov, L. I. (2002). Volostnoi sud v Rossii 60-kh – pervoi poloviny 70-kh godov XIX veka (po materialam Tsentral’nogo Chernozem’ya) [The Volost Court in Russia in the 1860s – First Half of the 1870s (Based on the Materials of the Central Black Earth Region)]. Voronezh, Izdatel’stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 447 p.

Zemtsov, L. I. (2004). Pravovye osnovy i organizatsiya deyatelnosti volostnykh sudov v poreformennoi Rossii (60-e – 80-e gg. XIX v.) [Legal Basis and Organisation of the Activity of Volost Courts in Post-Reform Russia (1860s–1880s)]. Dis. … dokt. ist. nauk. Lipetsk, S. n. 462 p.

Published

2022-03-26

How to Cite

Popp, I. (2022). Volost Clerks in Judicial Bureaucracy: The Myths and Reality of Post-Reform Russia. Quaestio Rossica, 10(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.1.666

Issue

Section

Problema voluminis