Politics in the Non-Political: The Ideology of Constitutional Reforms in Professional Congresses in the Early 20th Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.1.582Keywords:
political history, social history, history of professions, history of ideasAbstract
This article considers congresses organised by representatives of various professions (technicians, doctors, teachers) on the eve of the First Russian Revolution. Based on documents from the four most important and populous public meetings, the authors conclude that they turned into a meeting place for non-zemstvo intellectuals with public figures from the zemstvo movement, which led to the emergence of a political class. The purpose of this article is to describe the evolution that the congresses underwent based on the analysis of congress documents (meeting records, reports, resolutions, etc.), periodicals, and political investigations covering their work. It is demonstrated that congresses ceased to be reviews of achievements of certain branches of the national economy (science and technology, medicine, and public education), which were meant to confirm the recognition of their significance by the state. Instead, they turned into demonstrations of the independent position of professional figures on issues of professional and socio-political agenda, into channels for mobilising public opinion in the direction of constitutional reform of the autocratic system and ideological preparation for the First Russian Revolution. The congresses promoted the involvement of the community outside the zemstvo in transforming the bureaucratic system into a legal state and class-based Russian society into civil society. On the eve of 1905, public congresses were an important milestone in the development of the liberation movement in Russia and symbolised its transition to so-called “new liberalism”. It was characterised by overcoming the monopoly position of zemstvo activists in the liberal movement and involving various professional groups in Russian society, mobilising public opinion to discuss public participation in political decision-making. According to the authors, professional forums were historically significant as they had an impact on the ruling elite: they let it know about public ideas concerning urgent socio-political transformations and ensured public participation in the development of strategies for their implementation. Professional congresses lie at the intersection of several areas of modern historical knowledge: political and social history, the history of ideas, and the history of professions. However, they have not been studied comprehensively so far, and the authors fill this historiographical gap.
References
Balzer, H. D. (Ed.). (1996). Russia’s Missing Middle Class. The Professions in Russian History. Armonk, N. Y., M. E. Sharpe. 330 p.
Bradley, J. (2012). Obshchestvennye organizatsii v tsarskoi Rossii [Voluntary Associations in Tsarist Russia]. Moscow, Novyi khronograf. 447 p.
Dikson, K. I. (Ed.). (1903–1904). Dnevnik III-go s”ezda russkikh deyatelei po tekhnicheskomu i professional’nomu obrazovaniyu v S.-Peterburge (26 dekabrya 1903 – 6 yanvarya 1904 goda), izdavaemyi rasporyaditel’noi komissiei s”ezda [Record of the 3rd Congress of Russian Technical and Professional Education Leaders in St Petersburg (26 December 1903 – 6 January 1904), Published by the Administrative Commission of the Congress]. No. 1–11. St Petersburg, S. n.
Dva s”ezda [Two Congresses]. (1904). In Mir Bozhii. Ezhemesyachnyi literaturnyi i nauchno-populyarnyi zhurnal dlya samoobrazovaniya. No. 2, pp. 22–24.
GARF [State Archive of the Russian Federation]. Stock 102.00. 1904 Year. Dos. 200.
Gran, M. M., Frenkel’, Z. G., Shingarev, A. I. (Eds.). (1911). Nikolai Ivanovich Pirogov i ego nasledie. Pirogovskie s”ezdy [Nikolai Ivanovich Pirogov and His Legacy. Pirogov Congresses]. St Petersburg, Tovarishchestvo R. Golike i A. Vil’borg. [7], 257, XXXV p.
Istoricheskii urok [Historical Lesson]. (1904). In Osvobozhdenie. No. 57. October 2 (15), pp. 116–117.
Itogi III s”ezda deyatelei po tekhnicheskomu obrazovaniyu [Results of the 3rd Congress of Technical Education Leaders]. (1904). In Osvobozhdenie. No. 17 (41). February 5 (18), pp. 310–311.
Ivanov, A. E. (2019). Vysshaya shkola Rossiiskoi imperii XVIII – nachala XX veka. Izbrannye stat’i [Higher Schools of the Russian Empire of the 18th – Early 20th Century. Selected Articles]. Moscow, Printsipium. 702 p.
Kanishchev, V. Yu. (2006). Rol’ zhurnala “Osvobozhdenie” v formirovanii ko-stitutsionnodemokraticheskoi partii [The Role of the Osvobozhdenie Magazine in the Formation of the Constitutional Democratic Party]. Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Moscow, S. n. 301 p.
Kokoshkin, F. F. (1911). S. A. Muromtsev i zemskie s”ezdy [S. A. Muromtsev and Zemstvo Congresses]. In Sergei Andreevich Muromtsev. Sbornik statei. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo M. i S. Sabashnikovykh, pp. 205–250.
Medushevskii, A. N. (1998). Demokratiya i avtoritarizm: rossiiskii konstitutsionalizm v sravnitel’noi perspektive [Democracy and Authoritarianism: Russian Constitutionalism in Comparative Perspective]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 650 p.
Mironov, B. N. (2008). Politika versus istina. Osoboe soveshchanie o nuzhdakh sel’skokhozyaistvennoi promyshlennosti 1902–1905 gg. [Politics versus Truth: A Special Meeting on the Needs of the Agricultural Industry 1902–1905]. In Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Iss. 1, pp. 8–30.
Pavlov, D. B. (Ed.). (2001). Liberal’noe dvizhenie v Rossii. 1902–1905 gg. [The Liberal Movement in Russia. 1902–1905]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 646 p.
Pravo [Pravo]. (1905). No. 14.
RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 1284. List 187. 1904 Year. Dos. 370.
Russkie vedomosti [Russkie vedomosti]. (1902). No. 4, 6, 7, 11, 357; (1903). No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6; (1904). No. 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13.
S IX Pirogovskogo s”ezda [From the 9th Pirogov Congress]. (1904). In Osvobozhdenie. No. 19 (48). March 7 (20), pp. 332–333.
Shatsillo, K. F. (1985). Russkii liberalizm nakanune revolyutsii 1905–1907 gg. Organizatsiya, programmy, taktika [Russian Liberalism on the Eve of the Revolution of 1905–1907. Organisation, Programs, Tactics]. Moscow, Nauka. 347 p.
Shelokhaev, V. V. (2018). Liberalizm v Rossii v nachale XX veka [Liberalism in Russia at the Beginning of the 20th Century]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 504 p.
Skibnevskii, A. I. (1904). Devyatyi s”ezd russkikh vrachei v pamyat’ N. I. Pirogova. Kratkii obshchii obzor deyatel’nosti s”ezda [9th Congress of Russian Doctors in Memory of N. I. Pirogov. A Brief Overview of the Congress Activities]. Moscow, S. n. 12 p.
Solov’ev, K. A. (2009). Kruzhok “Beseda”. V poiskakh novoi politicheskoi real’nosti. 1899–1905 [The “Beseda” Circle. In Search for a New Political Reality. 1899–1905]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 288 p.
Stepanskii, A. D. (1983). Liberal’naya intelligentsiya v obshchestvennom dvizhenii Rossii na rubezhe XIX–ХХ vv. [The Liberal Intelligentsia in the Social Movement of Russia at the Turn of the 20th Century]. In Istoricheskie zapiski. Vol. 109. Moscow, Nauka, pp. 64–94.
Zhbankov, D. N. (1905). Statisticheskie dannye o vrachebnykh s”ezdakh [Statistical Data on Medical Congresses]. In Zhurnal Obshchestva russkikh vrachei v pamyat’ N. I. Pirogova. No. 1, pp. 3–24.
Zubkov, I. V. (2011). Pedagogicheskie organizatsii [Educational Institutions]. In Tumanova, A. S. (Ed.). Samoorganizatsiya rossiiskoi obshchestvennosti v poslednei treti XVIII – nachale XX v. Moscow, ROSSPEN, pp. 647–690.
