State Integrity and Self-Determination in a World of Problematic Sovereignty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.4.536Keywords:
sovereignty; territorial integrity; self-determination; unrecognized states; separatism; ethnopolitical conflictsAbstract
This article analyses the phenomenon of states with problematic sovereignty, which has arisen in recent decades, primarily in the former Yugoslavia and the USSR (but not only). The existing model of the world order, in which only UN member countries are recognised as participants in international relations, does not reflect a real picture of the world. At the beginning of the study, the authors examine theoretical approaches (A. Yannis. A. Tsutsiev, A. Sebentsov, V. Kolosov) to typologising entities with problematic sovereignty and territorial principles of national self-determination (i. e. the realisation of the right to self-determination) as well as re-conceptualising sovereignty approaches (J. Agnew and N. Dobronravin). Next, the authors describe how these topics are embedded in the logic of the developing crisis of relations between Russia and the West and lead to a diplomacy of double standards. It is especially emphasised that at different periods and depending on the political state of affairs, both sides in the present-day confrontation supported separatist projects and the preservation of territorial integrity and state unity. This results from contradictions in the system of international law, vague criteria for recognising newly formed independent states, and attempts to use conflicts instrumentally to realise strategic interests. According to the authors, a way out of this impasse could be an agreement between the West and Russia on some general rules of the game, including clearer criteria for the recognition of new states, the legality/illegality of secession, and the preservation of territorial integrity, as well as possible procedures for transition to a new status. However, this is unlikely to happen without reaching a comprehensive compromise or modus vivendi between the main stakeholders. The result of the article is a demonstration on the theoretical and applied levels that in the modern system of international relations, the concept of “territoriality” has become more complicated as a basic characteristic of the state. It now requires new legal and diplomatic approaches to resolve the contradiction between the principles of territorial integrity and the right of nations to self-determination. These new approaches should be developed by the expert community in the course of an unbiased analysis of the contemporary architecture of international relations.
References
Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo. (N. d.). In International Court of Justice [website]. URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/16010.pdf (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Agnew, J. (2003). Geopolitics: Re-Visioning World Politics. 2nd Ed. L., Routledge. 168 p.
Brooks, R. E. (2005). Failed States, or the State as Failure? In Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. Vol. 72. No. 4, pp. 1159–1196.
Brownlie, I. (1998). Principles of Public International Law. 5th Ed. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. 792 p.
Busygina, I. M., Okunev, I. Yu. (2014). Prostranstvennoe raspredelenie sily i strategii gosudarstv, ili Chto i kak ob’yasnyaet geopolitika [Spatial Distribution of Power and Strategies of States, or What and How Geopolitics Explains]. In Polis. Pоliticheskiе issledovaniya. No. 2, pp. 106–123.
Convention on Rights and Duties of States (Inter-American). December 26. (1933). In Yale Law School. Lillian Goldman Law Library [website]. URL: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/intam03.asp (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Cox, R. W. (2006). On Thinking about Future World Order. In Chan, S., Moore, C. (Eds.). Theory of International Relations. Vol. 3. Approaches to International Relations: Constructivism. L., Thousand Oaks, N. Delhi, Sage Publ., pp. 20–38.
De Waal, T. (2002). Ugrozy bezopasnosti na Yuzhnom Kavkaze [Security Threats in the South Caucasus]. In Vestnik Evropy. No. 7–8, pp. 35–38.
Dobronravin, N. A. (2011). Nepriznannye gosudarstva v “seroi zone” mirovoi politiki: osnovy vyzhivaniya i pravila suverenizatsii [Unrecognised States in the “Grey Zone” of Global Politics: Grounds of Survival and Rules for Acquiring Sovereignty]. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. 56 p.
Eriksen, T. H. (1995). We and Us: Two Modes of Group Identification. In J. of Peace Research. Vol. 32. No. 4, pp. 427–436. DOI 10.1177/0022343395032004004.
Geldenhuys, D. (2009). Contested States in World Politics. L., Palgrave Macmillan. 295 p.
Harzl, B. (2011). Nationalism and Politics of the Past: The Cases of Kosovo and Abkhazia. In Rev. of Central and East European Law. No. 36 (2), pp. 53–77. DOI 10.1163/092598811X12960354394722.
Jessop, B. (2016). The State. Past, Present and Future. Cambridge, Polity. 303 р.
Johnson, K., Coleman, A. (2012). Vnutrennii “Drugoi”: dialekticheskie vzaimosvyazi mezhdu konstruirovaniem regional’nykh i natsional’nykh identichnostei [The Internal Other: Exploring the Dialectical Relationship between Regional Exclusion and the Construction of National Identity]. In Kul’turnaya i gumanitarnaya geografiya. Vol. 1. No. 2, pp. 107–125.
Krastev, I. (2010). Ivan Krastev o rossiiskikh strakhakh i evropeiskom poryadke [Ivan Krastev on Russian Fears and European Order] / interview by S. M. Markedonov. In Caucasus Times [website]. 9 Dec. URL: http://caucasustimes.com/ru/ivan-krastev-orossijskih-strahah-i-ev/ (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Kratochwil, F. V. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge, N. Y., Cambridge Univ. Press. 317 p.
Luk’yanov, F. A. (2014). Apologiya nedoskazannosti [The Apologia of Understatement]. In Rossiiskaya gazeta [website]. 23 Dec. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2014/12/23/lukianov.html (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Markedonov, S. M. (2006). Zemlya i volya [Land and Will]. In Rossiya v global’noi politike. No. 1, pp. 30–40.
Markedonov, S. M. (2018). De-facto gosudarstva: politicheskii fenomen postsvetskogo prostranstva [De-Facto States: A Political Phenomenon of Post-Soviet Space]. In Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 1 (11), pp. 25–40. DOI 10.28995/2073-6339-2018-1-24-40.
Nikitin, A. I. (2017). Mezhdunarodnoe vmeshatel’stvo v sovremennye konflikty. Mirotvorcheskaya politika OON, OBSE, ЕS, NАТО и ОDКB [International Intervention in Modern Conflicts. The UN, OSCE, EU, NATO, and CSTO Peacekeeping Policy]. Moscow, June 2017. Doklad mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba “Valdai”, pp. 18–20. In Valdai [website]. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/files/16442 (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Obrashchenie prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Address of the President of the Russian Federation]. (2014). In Prezident Rossii [website]. 18 March. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603 (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Okunev, I. Yu. (2014). Mezhregional’naya differentsiatsiya kak osnova formirovaniya rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti [Interregional Differentiation as a Basis for Russian Statehood]. In Politiya. No. 2, pp. 70–83.
Okunev, I. Yu. (2019). Bylo by zhelanie. Desyat’ sposobov resheniya nerazreshimogo territorial’nogo spora [When There Is a Will, There Is a Way. Ten Ways of Settling an Insoluble Territorial Dispute]. In Rossiya v global’noi politike. No. 2, pp. 136–154.
Reshenie MS OON po Kosovo usilit pozitsii Abkhazii, zayavil prem’er strany [The International Court of Justice’s Decision Will Strengthen the Abkhazian Position, States the Prime Minister of the Country]. (2010). In RIA Novosti [website]. 23 Yuly. URL: http://ria.ru/politics/20100723/257739398.html (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Rumer, E., Sokolsky, R., Stronski, P. (2017). U.S. Policy toward the South Caucasus: Take Three. Washington, Carnegie Endowment for Intern. Peace. 44 p.
Sebentsov, A. B., Kolosov, V. A. (2012). Fenomen nekontroliruemykh territorii v sovremennom mire [The Phenomenon of Uncontrolled Territories in the Contemporary World]. In Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. No. 2, pp. 31–46.
Shaw, M. N. (1997). International Law. 4th Ed. N. Y., Cambridge Univ. Press. 939 p.
Stambul’skii summit OBSE. Vystyplenie Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii B. N. El’tsina [The OSCE Summit in Istanbul. Speech of President of the Russian Federation B. N. Yeltsin]. (1999). In MID Rossii. 18 Nov. URL: http://archive.mid.ru/bdomp/dip_vest.nsf/2b52bc67d48fb95643257e4500435ef7/30d93b83134c77aac3256886004d1ff5 (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Stenogramma press-konferentsii prezidenta Rossii Vladimira Putina dlya rossiiskikh i inostrannykh zhurnalistov [The Verbatim of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Press Conference for Russian and Foreign Journalists]. (2006). In Prezident Rossii [website]. January 31. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2006/01/31/1310_type63380type63381type82634_100848.shtml (accessed: 25.02.2020).
Toal, G. (2017). Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. 387 p.
Tsutsiev, A. A. (2006). Territorii problemnogo suvereniteta [Territories of Problematic Sovereignty]. In Nauchne tetradi Instituta Vostochnoi Evropy. Iss. 1. Nepriznannye gosudarstva. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego, pp. 15–30.
Tоkаrev, А. А. (2015). Vliyanie gosudarstvennosti na evolutsiyu politicheskikh rezhimov Gruzii i Ukrainy v 1991–2014 godakh [The Influence of Statehood on the Evolution of Political Regimes in Georgia and Ukraine between 1991 and 2014]. Moscow, MGIMO Universitet. 310 p.
Vasquez, J. A. (2002). Postpozitivistskoe techenie: rekonstruirovanie nauchnogo podkhoda i teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v epokhu kritiki klassicheskogo ratsionalizma [The Post-Positivist Debate: Reconstructing Scientific Enquiry and International Relations Theory after Enlightenment’s Fall]. In Booth, K., Smith, S. (Eds.). Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii na rubezhe stoletii. Мoscow, Gardariki, pp. 226–250.
Wendt, A. (1994) Collective Identity Formation and the International State. In Am. Political Science Rev. Vol. 88. No. 2, pp. 384–396. DOI 10.2307/2944711.
Yannis, A. (2002). Concept of Suspended Sovereignty in International Law and Its Implications in International Politics. In European J. of Intern. Law. No. 13 (5), pp. 13–35. DOI 10.1093/ejil/13.5.1037.
