To Avoid Unnecessary Red Tape: Vasily Tatishchev’s Proposals on Streamlining Court Proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.4.532Keywords:
Vasily Tatishchev; jurisprudence; courts; remuneration of labour; UralsAbstract
Vasily Tatishchev is known not only as an outstanding statesman, but also as a scientist who stood at the origin of many sciences. He gained fame as a legal scholar, an expert on the legislation of foreign countries and his homeland. Unlike any of his contemporaries, he reflected on the role of laws in the development of a country, formulated requirements for their content, raised the question of their codification, took the initiative to draft bills, and identified and prepared important legislative documents for publication. The previously unknown document presented in this article makes it possible to talk about Tatishchev’s attempt on behalf of the state to resolve another important issue, the remuneration of judges and clerical officers by introducing payments dependent on the total amount of the claim, the volume of prepared court documents, and their varieties. The author proves Tatishchev’s authorship in the development of such proposals, explaining the reasons for their appearance in terms of the upcoming reform of the plant management system based on bills developed by Tatishchev between 1734 and 1735: these were meant to regulate the relationship between the state and owners of private factories and the powers of the crown administration in state enterprises. The document adds to the existing idea of Tatishchev as a connoisseur of Russian legislation, his deep understanding of problems connected with the activities of judicial institutions, and his attempt to introduce remuneration principles enshrined in Swedish and German legislation into Russian legal practice. The implementation of these proposals would help expedite the adoption of judicial decisions and guarantee judges and clerical servants decent pay. The significance of the proposals formulated by Tatishchev cannot be overemphasised: there was hardly anyone else in Russia who was capable of offering a whole system of monetary compensation for those involved in organising court trials and drawing up documents, demonstrating deep detailed knowledge of judicial documentation.
References
Astrakhanskii, V. S. (1980). Katalog Ekaterinburgskoi biblioteki V. N. Tatishcheva 1737 g. [Catalogue of the Yekaterinburg Library of V. N. Tatishchev, 1737]. In Pamyatniki kul‘tury. Novye otkrytiya. Pis‘mennost‘. Iskusstvo. Arkheologiya. Ezhegodnik. Leningrad, Nauka, pp. 12–37.
Borodina, E. V. (2018). Sudebnoe povyt’e glavnogo organa upravleniya promyshlennost’yu na Urale v 1730-e – nachale 1740-kh gg.: shtaty i organizatsiya deloproizvodstva [Judicial Retribution of the Main Industrial Management Body in the Urals between the 1730s and Early 1740s: Staff and Organisation of Office Work]. In Nauchnoe obozrenie Sayano-Altaya. No. 4 (24). Iss. 7, pp. 4–10.
Dahl, V. (1956). Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka v 4 t. [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language. 4 Vols.]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo inostrannykh i natsional’nykh slovarei. Vol. 3. 555 p.
GASO [State Archive of Sverdlovsk Region]. Stock 24. List 12. Dos. 194, 215.
Herberstein, S. (2008). Zapiski o Moskovii v 2 t. [Notes about Muscovy. 2 Vols.]. Moscow, Pamyatniki istorisheskoi mysli. Vol. 1. 776 p.
Herberstein, S. von. (1567). Moscoviter wunderbare Historien… Basel, Brillinger & Russinger. 246 S.
Korsakov, D. A. (1887). V. N. Tatishchev. 1686–1750 [V. N. Tatishchev. 1686–1750]. In Russkaya starina. No. 6, pp. 563–590.
Penzin, E. A. (1976). Protokoly Sibirskogo oberbergamta (1723–1734) kak istoricheskii istochnik [Protocols of the Siberian Oberbergamt (1723–1734) as a Historical Source]. In Istoriografiya i istochnikovedenie. Sverdlovsk, Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta, pp. 126–139.
PSZ [Complete Collection of the Laws of the Russian Empire]. Coll. 1. Vol. 4, 5, 9.
Rossiiskoe zakonodatel’stvo X–XX vv. v 9 t. [Russian Legislation of the 10th–20th Centuries. 9 Vols.]. (1984‒1994). Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura. Vol. 4. 512 p.
Safronova, A. M., Porunov, M. V. (2015). Dokumentirovanie deyatel’nosti koronnoi administratsii v Zavodskom ustave V. N. Tatishcheva 1735 g. [Documentation of the Activities of the Crown Administration in the Factory Charter of V. N. Tatishchev, 1735]. In Dokument. Arkhiv. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Iss. 15, pp. 288–311.
Safronova, A. M. (2012). V. N. Tatishchev i biblioteki rannego Ekaterinburga: opyt istoricheskoi rekonstruktsii [V. N. Tatishchev and Libraries of Early Yekaterinburg: An Attempt at Historical Reconstruction]. Yekaterinburg, Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta. 552 p.
Schmidt, S. O. (1997). Put‘ istorika. Izbrannye trudy po istochnikovedeniyu i istoriografii [The Way of the Historian. Selected Works on Source Studies and Historiography]. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet. 612 p.
Sudebnik gosudarya tsarya i velikago knyazya Ioanna Vasil’evicha, i nekotorye sego gosudarya i blizhnikh ego preemnikov ukazy, sobrannye i primechaniyami iz”yasnennye pokoinym tainym sovetnikom i astrakhanskim gubernatorom Vasil’em Nikitichem Tatishchevym [Judicial Code of the Sovereign of the Tsar and Grand Duke Ioann Vasilievich, and Some of the Sovereign and His Close Successors’ Decrees, Collected and Explained by the Late Privy Councilor and Astrakhan Governor Vasily Nikitich Tatishchev]. (1768). Moscow, Imperatorskii universitet. [4], 138, [14] p.
Tatishchev, V. N. (1979). Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Leningrad, Nauka. 464 p.
Tatishchev, V. N. (1990). Zapiski. Pis’ma. 1717–1750 gg. [Notes. Letters. 1717–1750]. Moscow, Nauka. 440 p.
Zavodskoi ustav Tatishcheva [Tatishchev’s Factory Charter]. (1831). In Gornyi zhurnal. Book 1, pp. 1–22; Book 2, pp. 174–197; Book 3, pp. 332–349; Book 5, pp. 163–179; Book 6, pp. 331–344; Book 7, pp. 1–14; Book 8, pp. 145–157; Book 9, pp. 315–328; Book 10, pp. 1–16.
