Chigirin Freethinkers in Search of the Peasant Truth

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.4.530

Keywords:

Right-bank Ukraine; peasant psychology; post-reform village; Stundism; freethinkers; Siberia; administrative exile

Abstract

This article examines one of the most important events in the lives of S. Shutenko and F. Chepurnoy, two ordinary peasants of Chigirin uyezd, Kiev province, in the nineteenth century. The Chigirin freethinkers’ drama was connected with peasant unrest in left-bank Ukraine between the 1870s and 1880s. A number of comprehensive works have turned to their biographies (B. G. Litval and D. P. Poida). In this article, the peasants’ views are analysed through the prism of their tragic lives and dreams about the peasant truth, which resulted in their exile to Siberia. They served their first exile together in Yenisei province from 1882 to 1887. Chepurny served another exile in Irkutsk province from 1895 to 1900. There is little information about Shutenko’s later life. The research refers to unpublished archival documents from the funds of the State Archive of the Russian Federation and the state archives of Irkutsk, Tomsk and Krasnoyarsk. The author mostly focuses on judicial and investigation materials, as well as official correspondence between different state bodies. Also, the author refers to the memoirs of such revolutionaries as L. G. Deutsch and V. D. Debogory-Mokriyevich, both of whom were involved in peasant unrest in Chigirin. The reason for peasant unrest was discontent with the agrarian reforms in former state properties in right-bank Ukraine. Peasants perceived the agrarian reforms through the prism of their traditional worldview. They did not doubt the good intentions of the tsar, who granted the true peasant will. They treated the content of the agrarian reforms as treason on the part of officials and landowners, who they blamed for distorting the tsar’s will. The intentions themselves seemed to comply with peasants’ interests. As a result of peasant unrest, the religious teaching of Stundism gained in popularity. The article demonstrates how Stundism significantly influenced peasant estimation of agrarian changes on state properties in the southwestern part of the Russian Empire. The author concludes that Shutenko and Chepurnoy’s tragic destinies may be viewed as a result of peasant unrest in the post-reform Ukrainian village.

Author Biography

Viktor Maul

доктор исторических наук, профессор, Тюменский индустриальный университет, филиал в Нижневартовске.

628616, Россия, Ханты-Мансийский автономный округ – Югра, Нижневартовск, ул. Ленина, 2П, стр. 9.

ORCID 0000-0002-9584-8949

vymaul@mail.ru

References

Andriyanov, V. I., Levashov, V. K., Khlop’ev, A. T. (1993). “Slukhi” kak sotsial’nyi fenomen [“Rumours” as a Social Phenomenon]. In Sotsiologisheskie issledovaniya. No. 1, pp. 82–88.

Chigirinskoe delo. (Po ofitsial’nym istochnikam) [The Chigirin Case. (According to Official Sources)]. (1877). In Kievlyanin. No. 97. August, 16.

Deutsch, L. G. (1921). Zagovor sredi krest’yan Chigirinskogo uezda [A Conspiracy among the Peasants of Chigirin District]. In Sbornik materialov i statei / redaktsiya zhurnala “Istoricheskii arkhiv”. Iss. 1. Moscow, Gosizdat, pp. 73–79.

Deutsch, L. G. (1922). Za polveka [Within Half a Century]. Moscow, Zadruga. Vol. 1. Part 1. 127 p.

Deyateli revolyutsionnogo dvizheniya v Rossii. Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [Figures of the Revolutionary Movement in Russia. Bibliographic Dictionary]. (1932). Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Vsesoyuznogo obschestva politicheskikh katorzhan i ssyl’noposelentsev. Vol. 2. Iss. 4. 2156 columns.

Dick, I. (2007). Sut’ glavnykh religioznykh konfliktov v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX veka: vzglyad iznutri [The Essence of the Main Religious Conflicts in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th Century: A Look from Inside]. In Voprosy germanskoi istorii : Nemtsy Ukrainy i Rossii v konfliktakh i kompromissakh XIX–XX vekov. Sbornik statei. Dnepropetrovsk, Porogi, pp. 108–118.

Dubinin, B. V., Tolsty’kh, A. V. (1993). Slukhi kak sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii fenomen [Rumours as a Socio-Psychological Phenomenon]. In Voprosy psikhologii. No. 3, pp. 77–81.

Egorov, A. K. (2015). Slukhi kak ob”ekt istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Rumours as an Object of Historical Research]. In Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 3 (148). Vol. 2, pp. 7–10.

GAIO [State Archive of Irkutsk Region]. Stock 32. List 1. Dos. 4604; Stock 91. List 1. Dos. 2090.

GAKK [State Archive of Krasnoyarsk Region]. Stock 595. List 63. Dos. 1799.

GANIIO [State Archive of New Story of Irkutsk Region]. Stock 300. List 1. Dos. 14.

GARF [State Archive of the Russian Federation]. Stock 102. List 77 (3-e deloproizvodstvo, 1881 g.). Dos. 751; List 252. Dos. 1; Stock 109 (3-ya ekspeditsiya, 1875 g.). Dos. 144; Stock 109 (3-ya ekspeditsiya, 1877 g.). Dos. 262. Part 1; Stock 112. List 1. Dos. 477.

GATO [State Archive of Tomsk Region]. Stock 3. List 4. Dos. 964; List 37. Dos. 173.

Grebenkin, K. (Ed.). (1934). Materiali do istoriï selyan’skikh revolyutsiinikh rukhiv na Chigirinshchini (1875–1879 r. r.) [Materials for the History of the Peasant Revolutionary Movement in Chigirin (1875–1879)]. Kharkiv. Vidannya Tsentral’nogo arkhivnogo upravlinnya USRR. 440 p.

Khristoforov, I. A. (2011). Mezhdu chastnym i kazennym: krest’yanskaya reforma v gosudarstvennoi derevne, liberal’naya doktrina i spory o sobstvennosti [Between the Private and the Public: Peasant Reform in the State Village, Liberal Doctrine, and Property Disputes]. In Rossiiskaya istoriya. No. 2. pp. 93–109.

Litvak, B. G. (1989). Krest’yanskoe dvizhenie v Rossii 1775–1904 gg. Istoriya i metodika izucheniya istochnikov [The Peasant Movement in Russia, 1775–1904. History and Methods of Studying Sources]. Moscow, Nauka. 256 p.

Litvak, B. G. (1991). Perevorot 1861 goda v Rossii: pochemu ne realizovalas’ reformatorskaya al’ternativa [The 1861 Revolution in Russia: Why the Reform Alternative Was Never Realised]. Moscow, Politizdat. 302 p.

Maul, V. (2017b). “Chigirinskii zagovor” i krest’yanskaya psikhologiya [The Chigirin Conspiracy and Peasant Psychology]. In Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 5. No. 1, p. 221–240. DOI 10.15826/qr.2017.1.220.

Maul, V. Ya. (2017а). Vozhaki “Chigirinskogo zagovora” v kol’tse revolyutsionnogo okruzheniya [Leaders of the “Chigirin Conspiracy” in the Circle of the Revolutionary Environment]. In Istoriya, filosofiya, pedagogika, psikhologiya, parvo. Sbornik statei. Ryazan’, Sozvezdie, pp. 107–113.

Miroshnichenko, P. Ya. (1999). Kul’tura russkogo i ukrainskogo krest’yanstva kontsa epokhi feodalizma (1760–1861 gg.) [The Culture of the Russian and Ukrainian Peasantry at the End of the Feudal Era (1760–1861)]. Donetsk, Izdatel’stvo Donetskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta iskusstvennogo intellekta. 244 p.

Orlenko, N. S., Orlenko, N. N. (2018). Khutor Novochigirinovskii. Istoriya vozniknoveniya i pervye zhiteli [Novochigirinovsky Khutor. The History of Its Origin and First Residents]. S. l., Izdatel’skie resheniya. 36 p.

Pelevin, Yu. A. (2014). Yuzhnye buntari i “Chigirinskii zagovor” [Southern Rebels and the “Chigirin Conspiracy”]. In Rossiiskaya istoriya. No. 1. pp. 130–150.

Poberezhnikov, I. V. (1995). Slukhi v sotsial’noi istorii: tipologiya i funktsii (po materialam vostochnykh regionov Rossii XVIII–XIX vv.) [Rumours in Social History: Typology and Functions (Based on the Materials of the Eastern Regions of Russia of the 18th–19th Centuries)]. Yekaterinburg, Bank kul’turnoi informatsii. 58 p.

Poida, D. P. (1960). Krest’yanskoe dvizhenie na Pravoberezhnoi Ukraine v poreformennyi period (1866–1900 gg.) [The Peasant Movement in Right-Bank Ukraine in the Post-Reform Period (1866–1900)]. Dnepropetrovsk, Oblastnoe izdatel’stvo. 488 p.

PSZ [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Coll. 3. Vol. 2.

Repina, L. P. (2001). Istoricheskaya nauka na rubezhe XX–XXI vv.: sotsial’nye teorii i sotsiologicheskaya praktika [Historical Science at the Turn of the 21st Century: Social Theories and Historiographic Practice]. Moscow, Krug’’. 560 p.

Terekhova, S. A. (2019). “Chigirinskii zagovor” v sovremennoi rossiiskoi istoriografii [The “Chigirin Conspiracy” in Modern Russian Historiography]. In Narodniki v istorii Rossii. Iss. 3. Voronezh, Istoki, pp. 7–16.

Usenko, O. G. (2004). Primernaya strategiya interpretatsii sledstvennykh materialov po delam o gosudarstvennykh prestupleniyakh v Rossii XVII–XVIII vv. [An Approximate Strategy for the Interpretation of Investigative Materials on Cases of State Crimes in Russia in the 17th–18th Centuries]. In Narod i vlast’ : istoricheskie istochniki i metody issledovaniya. Materialy XVI nauchnoi konferentsii, Moskva, 30–31 yanvarya 2004 g. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, pp. 366–369.

Vsepoddanneishii otchet ober-prokurora Svyateishago sinoda K. Pobedonostseva po vedomstvu pravoslavnago ispovedaniya za 1885 god [The Most Substantial Report of the Chief Prosecutor of the Holy Synod K. Pobedonostsev on the Department of the Orthodox Denomination for 1885]. (1887). St Petersburg, Sinodal’naya tipografiya. 406 p.

Published

2020-11-26

How to Cite

Maul, V. (2020). Chigirin Freethinkers in Search of the Peasant Truth. Quaestio Rossica, 8(4), 1321–1334. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.4.530

Issue

Section

Problema voluminis