Priesthood and Tsardom as Viewed by Siberian Metropolitan Ignatii (Rimsky-Korsakov)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.4.518Keywords:
Ignatii (Rimsky-Korsakov); church-state relations; the Russian Church in the 17th century; Tobolsk diocese; bishopAbstract
Relations between the Orthodox Church and the tsardom of Muscovy in the second half of the seventeenth century have become one of the most important issues of the Church and social agenda. However, the views of the Great Russian episcopate and the degree of their connection with the declarations and claims of the leaders of the Russian Church in the pre-Petrine era remain little-studied. The author suggests that the ideological attitudes at the beginning of Alexei Mikhailovich’s reign and during the reforms of Patriarch Nikon forged the worldview of a generation of Russian bishops, including that of Ignatii (Rimsky-Korsakov) (died in 1701), metropolitan of Tobolsk and Siberia, a famous church leader, religious writer, and thinker. The author examines the bishop’s activity as that of a bearer of both a traditional and innovative worldview in order to correctly assess Ignatii’s striving for change and acceptance of innovation. The article refers to a number of works (including unpublished ones) and the bishop’s activities in order to reconstruct the metropolitan’s views on church-state relations. According to the concept of the “Byzantine (Constantinople) heritage” and philhellenic ideas, Ignatii put priesthood over tsardom in origin, sought the complete independence of the church court, and strove to expand the role of the Church in public life. At the same time, he emphasised the responsibility of royal power to take care of the Church. Ignatii directly writes about tsars’ duty to render “reverence and obedience” to the patriarch. An analysis of the Tobolsk bishop’s views demonstrates their closeness to those of many figures in the Russian Church at the time, such as patriarchs Nikon, Joachim, and Adrian, philhellenic writers, etc. The views of the higher clergy on the relationship between priesthood and stardom were new in comparison with the tradition of the sixteenth and first half of the seventeenth centuries, and the officials of the young Tsar Peter were more likely to follow the traditional policy of subordinating the Church to the state. The author concludes that it was precisely the understanding by bishops of the Church’s place and role in the tsardom of Muscovy that caused Peter I to completely replace Russians in the episcopate with candidates from the Kiev metropolia.
References
Arkhipastyri Tobol’skoi eparkhii [Bishops of Tobolsk Diocese]. (1992). In Religiya i Tserkov’ v Sibiri. Sbornik nauchnykh statei i dokumental’nykh materialov. Iss. 4. Tyumen, MI “Rutra”, pp. 76–89.
Balalykin, D. A. (2006). Problemy “Svyashchenstva” i “Tsarstva” v Rossii vtoroi poloviny XVII v. v otechestvennoi istoriografii (1917–2000 gg.) [Problems of “Priesthood” and “Tsardom” in Russia in the Second Half of the 17th Century in Russian Historiography (1917–2000)]. Moscow, Vest’. 335 p.
BAN [Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. P. I. A 10.
Belyakova, E. V. (2000). Adrian [Adrian]. In Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya. Moscow, Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 1, pp. 312–313.
Bogdanov, A. P. (1995). Rossiya nakanune imperii: politicheskie kontseptsii i real’nost’ poslednei chetverti XVII v. [Russia on the Eve of Empire: Political Concepts and the Reality of the Last Quarter of the 17th Century]. In Rimsko-konstantinopol’skoe nasledie na Rusi: ideya vlasti i politicheskaya praktika. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnogo seminara istoricheskikh issledovanii “Ot Rima k Tret’emu Rimu”, Moskva, 29–31 maya 1989 g. Moscow, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN, рp. 333–352.
Chesnokova, N. P. (2011). Khristianskii Vostok i Rossiya: politicheskoe i kul’turnoe vzaimodeistvie v seredine XVII veka (po dokumentam Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhiva drevnikh aktov) [The Christian East and Russia: Political and Cultural Interaction in the Mid-17th Century (According to the Documents of the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts)]. Moscow, Indrik. 288 p.
Drevnie tserkovnye gramoty Vostochno-sibirskogo kraya (1653–1726) i svedeniya o Daurskoi missii, sobrannye missionerom arkhimandritom Meletiem [Medieval Church Letters of the East Siberian Region (1653–1726) and Information about the Dauria Mission Collected by the Missionary Archimandrite Meletiy]. (1875). Kazan, Universitetskaya tipogrofiya. XXX, 199 p.
Esipov, G. V. (1863). Raskol’nich’i dela XVIII stoletiya, izvlechennye iz del preobrazhenskogo prikaza i tainoi rozysknykh del kantselyarii [Schismatic Cases of the 18th Century, Extracted from the Files of the Preobrazhensky Prikaz and the Secret Investigation Office]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya tovarishchestva “Obshchestvennaya pol’za”. Vol. 2. 276 p.
Kapterev, N. F. (1885). Kharakter otnoshenii Rossii k pravoslavnomu Vostoku v XVI i XVII stoletiyakh [The Nature of Russia’s Attitude to the Orthodox East in the 16th and 17th Centuries]. Moscow, Tipografiya L. F. Snegireva. 580 p.
Kapterev, N. F. (1892). Suzhdenie bol’shogo moskovskogo Sobora 1667 goda o vlasti tsarskoi i patriarshei. (K voprosu o preobrazovanii vysshego tserkovnogo upravleniya Petrom Velikim) [The Judgment of the Great Moscow Council of 1667 on the Power of the Tsar and the Patriarch. (On the Question of the Transformation of Church Administration by Peter the Great)]. In Bogoslovskii vestnik. Vol. 2. No. 6, pp. 483–516. Vol. 3. No. 10, pp. 46–74.
Kharlampovich, K. V. (1914). Malorossiiskoe vliyanie na velikorusskuyu tserkovnuyiu zhizn’ [Ukrainian Influence on Great Russian Church Life]. Kazan, M. A. Golubev. Vol. 1. 878 p.
Nikulin, I. A. (2011). Gramota v Pekin svyashchenniku Maksimu Leontievu mitropolita Ignatiya (Rimskogo-Korsakova) kak pamyatnik literatury kontsa XVII v. [A Letter to Beijing Written by Metropolitan Ignatii (Rimsky-Korsakov) to Priest Maxim Leontiev as a Literary Artefact of the Late 17th Century]. In Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoi dukhovnoi seminarii. No. 2, pp. 206–221.
Nikulin, I. A., pr. (2015). Preosvyashchennyi Ignatii (Rimskii-Korsakov), mitropolit Sibirskii i Tobol’skii [Bishop Ignatii (Rimsky-Korsakov), Metropolitan of Tobolsk and Siberia] / ed. by I. L. Man’kova. Yekaterinburg, Ekaterinburgskaya dukhovnaya seminariya. 313 p.
Ogloblin, N. N. (1892). Biblioteka sibirskogo mitropolita Ignatiya, 1700 g. [Library of Ignatii, Metropolitan of Siberia, 1700]. In Bibliograf. No. 8–9. Section 1, pp. 286–291.
Panchenko, A. M. (1984). Russkaya kul’tura v kanun petrovskikh reform [Russian Culture on the Eve of Peter’s Reforms]. Leningrad, Nauka. 205 p.
Panich, T. V. (2007). Pisateli patriarshego kruga v bogoslovskoi polemike 80-kh – 90-kh gg. XVII v. [Writers of the Patriarchal Circle in the Theological Debate of the 1680s–1690s]. Dis. … dokt. filol. nauk. Novosibirsk, S. n. 437 p.
Poloznev, D. F. (1996). Moskovskie patriarkhi Ioasaf II, Pitirim, Ioakim i Adrian [Moscow Patriarchs Ioasaf II, Pitirim, Joachim and Adrian]. In Makarii (Bulgakov), metr. Istoriya russkoi tserkvi v 7 kn. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Spaso-Preobrazhenskogo Valaamskogo monastyrya. Book 7, pp. 440–495.
Poslaniya blazhennago Ignatiya, mitropolita Sibirskogo i Tobol’skogo [Epistles of Blessed Ignatii, Metropolitan of Siberia and Tobolsk]. (1855). Kazan, Tipografiya gubernskogo pravleniya. 176 p.
Postnikov, S. (1866). Afanasii, pervyi arkhiepiskop Kholmogorskii i Vazheskii [Athanasius, the First Archbishop of Kholmogory and Vaga]. In Strannik. October, pp. 5–42.
PSRL [Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles]. (1987). Vol. 36. Part 1. Sibirskie letopisi: gruppa Esipovskoi letopisi. Moscow, Nauka. 381 p.
Repina, L. P. (2001). Istoricheskaya nauka na rubezhe XX–XXI vv.: sotsial’nye teorii i sotsiologicheskaya praktika [Historical Studies at the Turn of the 21st Century: Social Theories and Historiographic Practice]. Moscow, Krug’’. 560 p.
RGADA [Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts]. Stock 214. List 1. St. 531, 788, 858; List 3. Dos. 1058.
Sinitsyna, N. V. (1998). Tretii Rim. Istoki i evolyutsiya russkoi srednevekovoi kontseptsii (XV–XVI vv.) [The Third Rome. The Origins and Evolution of Russian Medieval Concepts (15th–16th Centuries)]. Moscow, Indrik. 416 p.
Skvortsov, G. A. (1913). Patriarkh Adrian: ego zhizn’ trudy v sviazi s sostoyaniem Russkoi Tserkvi v poslednee desyatiletie XVII veka [Patriarch Adrian: His Life and Works in Connection with the State of the Russian Church in the Last Decade of the 17th Century]. Kazan, Tsentral’naya tipografiya. 369 p.
Strakhova, O. B. (2007). Ofitsial’naya titulatura russkikh patriarkhov v izdaniyakh Moskovskogo Pechatnogo dvora (1589–1700 gg.) [Official Titling of Russian Patriarchs in the Publications of the Moscow Print Yard (1589–1700)]. In Palaeoslavica. Vol. 15. Iss. 2, pp. 117–206.
“Svidetel’stvo… o Rossiiskom blagoslovennom tsarstvii” [“A Testimony about the Russian Blessed Tsardom”]. (1983). In Bogdanov, A. P. (Ed.). Pamyatniki obshchestvenno-politicheskoi mysli v Rossii kontsa XVII veka: Literaturnye panegiriki v 2 ch. Moscow, Institut istorii SSSR. Part 2, pp. 233–241.
