“Russian History Should Be Written by Russians, Why Are Hungarians Interfering?”: A Microhistoriographical Study

Authors

  • Gyula Szvák

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.1.564

Keywords:

historiography, collapse of the USSR, crisis of historical studies, Sándor Szili, history of Siberia, russophobia, R. G. Skrynnikov, I. Ya. Froyanov, St Petersburg University, Faculty of History

Abstract

This article is based on the discussion (mock defense) of Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovy State), the PhD thesis by Sándor Szili, a young Hungarian historian (supervised by R. G. Skrynnikov). The discussion took place at the department of Russian history at St Petersburg State University in the summer of 1992 and resulted in a devastating critique of the dissertation. This ordinary event is presented and analysed in the broad context of the global political changes associated with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the socialist camp. The author recreates the atmosphere of uncertainty, deprivation, loss of life guidelines, and radical change in values that dominated both in Hungary and in post-Soviet Russia. The destruction of the habitual way of life of tens of millions of people and the catastrophic breakdown on a geopolitical scale could not but affect the state of historical studies. The theoretical and methodological vacuum formed as a result of the collapse of Marxist-Leninist ideology and the feeling of catastrophe, the death of the nation and the state, caused a reaction among some historians in the form of a bizarre mixture of neo-imperial, radical communist, and xenophobic views on the historical process and their awareness of Russia’s role and place in that process. The author demonstrates that the bearers of such views set the tone for the discussion of the dissertation. Even though it is not devoid of many shortcomings, at another time and in another place the dissertation could have well been presented for defense. This is evinced by very calm and constructive external feedback received from well-known specialists who were not members of the department. But in the process of public discussion the scholarly debate turned into politicised criticism from the very beginning, and the PhD candidate had no allies. The situation took on a paradoxical character: having got rid of the shackles of the dominant ideology, the participants in the discussion behaved much more harshly and irreconcilably than during the Soviet “stagnation”. The story described in the article is a vivid concrete manifestation of the crisis of Russian historical studies, which had to be overcome between the late 1980s and 1990s.

Author Biography

Gyula Szvák

Dr. Hab. (History), Professor, Eötvös Loránd University.

1–3, Egyetem tér, 1053, Budapest, Hungary.

szvakgyula@gmail.com

References

Aleksandrov, V. A. (1992). Otzyv na dissertatsiyu Sh. Sili “Klyuchevye voprosy prisoedineniya Sibiri k Rossii v kontse XVI–XVII vv. v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (razvitie kontseptsii vkhozhdeniya Zaural’ya v sostav Moskovskogo gosudarstva)” [Review of the PhD Thesis of S. Szili Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovite State)]. Manuscript. [Moscow]. 3 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Alekseev, V. V. Ural’skaya shkola istorikov [The Ural School of Historians]. In Szvák, G. (Ed.). Regional’nye shkoly russkoi istoriografii. Budapest, Russica Pannonicana, pp. 12–20.

Alekseev, Yu. G., Vorob’ev, V. M. et al. (2005). Pamyati Aleksandra L’vovicha Shapiro [In Memory of Alexander Lvovich Shapiro]. In Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Istoriya. Iss. 4, pp. 3–17.

Békés, P. (1992). Hazafelé, félúton. In Filmvilág. Iss. 4, pp. 19–20.

Bordyugov, G. A. (Ed.). (1996). Istoricheskie issledovaniya v Rossii. Tendentsii poslednikh let [Historical Research in Russia. Trends in Recent Years]. Moscow, AIRO-XX. 463 p.

Brachev, V. S. (2006a). Masony u vlasti [Masons in Power]. Moscow, Algoritm, EKSMO. 640 p.

Brachev, V. S. (2006b). Travlya russkikh istorikov [The Persecution of Russian Historians]. Moscow, Algoritm. 320 p.

Dvornichenko, A. Yu. (2001). Vladimir Vasil’evich Mavrodin. Stranitsy zhizni i tvorchestva [Vladimir Vasilievich Mavrodin. Pages from His Life and Works]. St Petersburg, Filologicheskii fakul’tet Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 192 p.

Dvornichenko, A. Yu. (Ed.). (2004). Istoricheskii fakul‘tet Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta (1934–2004). Ocherk istorii [Faculty of History, St Petersburg University (1934–2004). An Essay on History]. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 390 p.

Froyanov, I. Ya. (1997). Oktyabr’ semnadtsatogo (glyadya iz nastoyashchego) [October 17th (Looking from the Present)]. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 159 p.

Froyanov, I. Ya. (1999). Pogruzhenie v bezdnu (Rossiya na iskhode XX veka) [Diving into the Abyss (Russia in the Late 20th Century)]. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 800 p.

Froyanov, I. Ya. (2007). Drama russkoi istorii. Na putyakh k Oprichnine [The Drama of Russian History. On the Way to the Oprichnina]. Moscow, Parad. 952 p.

Havas, F., Krausz, T. (2000). Dokumentumok történeti ruszisztikánk tárgyköréből. Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet. 199 p.

Jegyzőkönyv Szili Sándor “Szibéria meghódításának koncepciói az orosz és szovjet historiográfiában” című kandidátusi értekezésének műhelyvitájáról : Record of the Workshop Discussion of Sándor Szili’s Candidate’s Dissertation Entitled “Concepts of the Conquest of Siberia in Russian and Soviet Historiography” : manuscript. Budapest, Nov. 5. 10 p. In Arkhiv Vengerskogo instituta rusistiki.

Kecskeméthy, G. (N. d.). Tovarisi konyec. In Beszélő [website]. URL: http://beszelo.c3.hu/cikkek/tovarisi-konyec (accessed: 23.06.2020).

Kéri, L. (2009). Húszéves a rendszer. 1992 a reménytelen diskurzusok éve. In Népszabadság. Március 9.

Keskeny, E. (2012). A magyar-orosz kapcsolatok. 1989–2002. Budapest, Századvég Kiadó. 282 p.

Könczöl, C. (1992). A BBC a magyarországi russzofóbiáról. In Népszabadság. Június 5.

Korzun, V. P., Myagkov, G. P. (2017). Nauchnye shkoly v rossiiskoi istoricheskoi nauke. (Opyt istoriograficheskogo osmysleniya poslednikh desyatiletii [Academic Schools in Russian Historical Studies (An Attempt at an Historiographical Understanding of Recent Decades)]. In Vorob‘eva, O. V. (Ed.). Professiya – istorik. K yubileyu L. P. Repinoi. Moscow, Akvilon, pp. 364–409.

Krausz, T. (1991a). A peresztrojka vége? : Kerekasztal-beszélgetés. Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet. 62 p.

Krausz, T. (1991b). Van-e alternatívája az orosz konzervativizmusnak? In Krausz, T. (Ed.). A Szovjetunió vége? (Szakértői gyorsjelentés). Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet, pp. 7–25.

Krausz, T. (1992a). Előszó. In Krausz, T. (Ed.). A jelcini gazdaságpolitika alternatívái (Szakértői jelentés). Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet, pp. 3–5.

Krausz, T. (1992b). Előszó. In Krausz, T. (Ed.). Jelcin és a jelcinizmus (Szakértői jelentés). Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet, pp. 3–5.

Krausz, T. (1996). Szovjet Thermidor. A sztálini fordulat szellemi előzményei, 1917–1928. Budapest, Napvilág Kiadó. 255 p.

Krausz, T., Máté, I. (1993). A rendszerváltás a tények tükrében (1989–1991). Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet. 107 p.

Lavrov, A. S. (1992). Retsenziya na rukopis’ kandidatskoi dissertatsii Shandora Sili “Klyuchevye voprosy prisoedineniya Sibiri k Rossii v kontse XVI–XVII vv. v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (razvitie kontseptsii vkhozhdeniya Zaural’ya v sostav Moskovskogo gosudarstva)” [Review of the Manuscript of Sándor Szili’s PhD Thesis Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovite State)]. Manuscript. [St Petersburg]. 5 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Logunov, A. P. (1996). Krizis istoricheskoi nauki, ili Nauka v usloviyakh obshchestvennogo krizisa: istoriografiya vtoroi poloviny 80-kh – nachala 90-kh gg. [The Crisis of Historical Studies, or Scholarship in the Conditions of Social Crisis: Historiography in the Second Half of the 80s – Early 90s]. In Afanas’ev, Yu. N., Logunov, A. P. (Eds.). Sovetskaya istoriografiya. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, pp. 447–487.

Népszabadság. (1992). Nov. 11.

Nevezhin, V. A., Prutskova, O. A. (1996). Izdanie istoricheskoi literatury: krizis ili stabilizatsiya? [The Publication of Historical Literature: Crisis or Stabilisation?]. In Bordyugov, G. A. (Ed.). Istoricheskie issledovaniya v Rossii. Tendentsii poslednikh let. Moscow, AIRO-XX, pp. 22–36.

Nikitin, N. I. (1992). Otzyv na rukopis’ kandidatskoi dissertatsii Shandora Sili “Klyuchevye voprosy prisoedineniya Sibiri k Rossii v kontse XVI–XVII vv. v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (razvitie kontseptsii vkhozhdeniya Zaural’ya v sostav Moskovskogo gosudarstva)” (Sankt-Peterburg, 1992) [Review of the Manuscript of Sándor Szili’s PhD Thesis Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovite State) (St Petersburg, 1992)]. Manuscript. [Moscow]. 11 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Otzyv na kandidatskuyu dissertatsiyu Sili Shandora “Klyuchevye voprosy prisoedineniya Sibiri k Rossii v kontse XVI–XVII vv. v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (razvitie kontseptsii vkhozhdeniya Zaural’ya v sostav Moskovskogo gosudarstva)” [Review of Sándor Szili’s PhD Thesis Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovite State)]. Manuscript. [St Petersburg]. 19 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Peterburgskii universitet v bor‘be za istoriyu. Vedushchii Ivan Tolstoi [Petersburg University in the Struggle for History. Hosted by Ivan Tolstoy]. (2000). In Radio “Svoboda” [website]. January 1. URL: https://www.svoboda.org/a/24200527.html (accessed: 26.06.2020).

Petrov, A. (1991). Privatizálás a Szovjetunióban. Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet. 73 p.

Pis’mo R. G. Skrynnikova Dyule Svaku ot 12 iyulya 1992 g. [R. G. Skrynnikov’s Letter to Gyula Szvák, 12 July 1992]. (1992). 3 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Pis’mo Shandora Sili Dyule Svaku ot 14 aprelya 2020 g. [Sándor Szili’s Letter to Gyula Szvák, April 14, 2020]. (2020). In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Pis’mo Shandora Sili Dyule Svaku ot 21 aprelya 2020 g. [Sándor Szili’s Letter to Gyula Szvák, April 21, 2020]. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Pis’mo Shandora Sili Dyule Svaku ot 4 maya 2020 g. [Sándor Szili’s Letter to Gyula Szvák, May 4, 2020]. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Pis’mo Shandora Sili Dyule Svaku ot 21 maya 2020 g. [Sándor Szili’s Letter to Gyula Szvák, May 21, 2020]. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Rossiya v 1992 godu. My vyzhivali kak mogli [Russia in 1992. We Survived as Best We Could]. (N. d.). In Klikabol [website]. URL: https://klikabol.com/2017/09/rossiya-v-1992-godu-my-vyzhivali-kak-mogli.html (accessed: 30.04.2020).

Rossiya v 1992–1999 gg.: vnutrennyaya politika [Russia in 1992–1999: Internal Policy]. (N. d.). In Online-shkola Foksford [website]. URL: https://foxford.ru/wiki/istoriya/rossiya-v-1992-1999-gg-vnutrennyaya-politika (accessed: 02.05.2020).

Sáringer, J. (N. d.). Az orosz elnök látogatása – Antall József és Borisz Jelcin ‒ Moszkva bocsánatkérése 1956-ért és a “nullszaldós” megoldás. In Magyar Hírlap [website]. URL: http://www.magyarhirlap.hu/tudomany/Az_orosz_elnok_latogatasa (accessed: 04.05.2020).

Sedov, P. V. (1992). Otzyv na kandidatskuyu dissertatsiyu Shandora Sili “Klyuchevye voprosy prisoedineniya Sibiri k Rossii v kontse XVI–XVII vv. v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (razvitie kontseptsii vkhozhdeniya Zaural’ya v sostav Moskovskogo gosudarstva)” Review of the PhD Thesis by Sándor Szili Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovite State)]. Manuscript. [St Petersburg]. 6 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Skrynnikov, R. G. (2016). Reign of Terror: Ivan IV. Leiden, Boston, Brill. 630 p.

Sverdlov, M. B. (1992). Otzyv o kandidatskoi dissertatsii Shandora Sili “Klyuchevye voprosy prisoedineniya Sibiri k Rossii v kontse XVI–XVII vv. v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (razvitie kontseptsii vkhozhdeniya Zaural’ya v sostav Moskovskogo gosudarstva)” [Review of the PhD Thesis by Sándor Szili Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovite State)]. Manuscript. [St Petersburg]. 7 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Szili, S. (2005). Szibéria birtokbavételének koncepciói az orosz és a szovjet történetírásban. Budapest, Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet. 235 p.

Szili, S. (2016). A szibériai frontier a 17. században. In Az orosz birodalom születései, szerk. Budapest, Gondolat Kiadó, pp. 61–74.

Szvák, G. (1982). I. Ja. Frojanov: Kijevszkaja Rusz. Ocserki szocialno-polityicseszkoj isztorii Leningrád, 1980. In Századok. Iss. 5, pp. 1098–1101.

Szvák, G. (1983). A leningrádi történészműhely. In Egyetemi Lapok: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem lapja. Iss. 4, pp. 2–5.

Szvák, G. (1984). Klyuchevye problemy sotsial’no-politicheskoi istorii Rossii vtoroi poloviny XVI veka v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (reformy i oprichnina Ivana IV) [Key Problems of the Socio-Political History of Russia in the Second Half of the 16th Century in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Reforms and Oprichnina of Ivan IV)]. Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Leningrad, S. n. 195 p.

Szvák, G. (Ed.). (1993). El’tsinshchina [Yeltsinism]. Budapest, Vengerskii institut rusistiki. 103 p.

Szvák, G. (1999). Prezident Boris – tsar’ Boris [President Boris – Tsar Boris]. In Krausz, T. (Ed.). Konets El’tsinshchiny. Budapest, Vengerskii institut rusistiki, pp. 7–11.

Szvák, G. (2009). K voprosu o genezise rusofobii [On the Genesis of Russophobia]. In Gosudarstvo i natsiya v Rossii i Tsentral’no-Vostochnoi Evrope. Budapest, Russica Pannonicana, pp. 21–29.

Szvák, G. (2011). The Golden Age of Russian Historical Writing: The Nineteenth Century. In Macintyre, S., Maigushca, J., Pók, A. (Eds.). The Oxford History of Historical Writing. 5 Vols. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. Vol. 4. 1800–1945, pp. 303–325.

Szvák, G. (2014). Istorik i kazak [Historian and Cossack]. In Na sluzhbe u Klio i u vlast’ prederzhashchikh. (Etyudy po rossievedeniyu). Budapest, Russica Pannonicana, pp. 168–170.

Szvák, G. (2018). „Nem lelkendezhetek főállásban”. Beszélgetések Oroszországról. Budapest, Gondolat Kiadó. 220 p.

Szvák, G., Szili S. (Eds.). (2005). A középkori orosz történelem forrásai. Budapest, Pannonica Kiadó. 318 p.

Szvák, G., Szili S. (Eds.). (2009). A normann kérdés az orosz történelemben. I. Források. Budapest, Russica Pannonicana. 327 p.

Tanár adatlap. (N. d.). In Mark My Professor [website]. URL: http://www.markmyprofessor.com/tanar/adatlap/8709.html (accessed: 28.06.2020).

Tokareva, M. (N. d.). Isk otklonen, istoriya prodolzhaetsya. Peterburgskii istfak nuzhdaetsya v radikal’nom obnovlenii [The Claim Was Rejected, the Story Continues. St Petersburg History Department Needs a Radical Renovation]. In Russkaya narodnaya liniya [internet-portal]. URL: https://ruskline.ru/monitoring_smi/2002/06/25/isk_otklonen_istoriya_prodolzhaetsya (accessed: 26.06.2020).

Tsamutali, A. N. (1992). Otzyv o kandidatskoi dissertatsii Shandora Sili “Klyuchevye voprosy prisoedineniya Sibiri k Rossii v kontse XVI–XVII vv. v russkoi i sovetskoi istoriografii (razvitie kontseptsii vkhozhdeniya Zaural’ya v sostav Moskovskogo gosudarstva)” [Review of the PhD Thesis by Sándor Szili Key Issues of Russia’s Annexation of Siberia in the Late 16th – 17th Centuries in Russian and Soviet Historiography (The Development of the Concept of the Trans-Urals’ Entry into the Muscovite State)]. Manuscript. [St Petersburg]. 3 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Vida, L. (1992). Ordas indulatok leselkednek. Birodalmi reformok. In Magyar Nemzet. Január 2; november 11.

Zametki Shandora Sili [Notes by Sandor Szili]. (1992). Manuscript. 11 p. In Lichnyi arkhiv Sh. Sili.

Published

2021-04-04

How to Cite

Szvák, G. (2021). “Russian History Should Be Written by Russians, Why Are Hungarians Interfering?”: A Microhistoriographical Study. Quaestio Rossica, 9(1), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.1.564

Issue

Section

Scientia et vita