Between Two Empires: Railway Construction in the Far East in the Late Imperial Period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2024.1.877Keywords:
Russian Empire, railway construction, Manchuria, China, crossborder, Chinese Eastern Railway, integrationAbstract
Based on a wide range of archival sources, this article analyses the history of the creation and functioning of the Nikolskaya branch of the Ussuri Railway in the conditions of the Russian-Chinese transborder of the eastern approach to the Chinese Eastern Railway (CER). Designed to connect the CER with the Russian railway network, this branch was significant in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries from the point of view of ensuring the connection of the Trans-Siberian Railway with Vladivostok before the construction of a bypass along the Amur. The concept of “transborder” makes it possible to fit this plot into the broader problem of the formation of contact sociocultural zones along the long land border between Russia and China. The unification of the roads of the two empires into a single railway network led to an increase in migration flows, the founding of new settlements, and the development of civil and military infrastructure, elements of which can be still seen today. At the same time, for a long time, researchers paid no attention to the construction of the connecting branches of the CER and the Trans-Siberian Railway, excluding the adjacent territories from the general narrative of transborder issues, which makes the study particularly relevant. At the same time, archival materials make it possible to characterise not only the difficulties that the Russian government encountered during the construction of the connecting branch but also the initial stage of the formation of a network of settlements along it, their development, as well as the specifics of existence in transborder conditions. The listed issues were raised not only in the Committee of the Siberian Railway, the Ministry of Railways, and the Ministry of Finance, which directly supervised the construction and determined the volume of financing, but also in the CER Society. From the financial point of view, turning to the method of joint road construction using private and state funds, previously tested on other railways in the country, would become one of the arguments for leasing the Ussuri Railway to the CER Society.
References
Agapov, М. (2018). V poiskakh “vykhoda iz tupika”: transsibirskie transportnye proekty kontsa XIX – nachala XX v. [Looking for a “Way out”: Trans-Siberian Transportation Projects at the Turn of the 20th Century]. In Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 6. No. 3, pp. 771–783. DOI 10.15826/qr.2018.3.327.
Al’bom ispolnitel’nykh chertezhei Yuzhno- i Severo-Ussuriiskoi zheleznoi dorogi. 1891–1894, 1894–1897 [Album of Executive Drawings of the South and North Ussuri Railway. 1891–1894, 1894–1897]. (1900). St Petersburg, Tovarishchestvo khudozhestvennoi pechati. 2 p., 94 l.
Alekseev, A. I., Morozov, B. N. (1989). Osvoenie russkogo Dal’nego Vostoka (konets XIX v. – 1917 g.) [Development of the Russian Far East (End of the 19th Century – 1917)]. Moscow, Nauka. 221 p.
Barbenko, Ya. A., Blyakher, L. E. et al. (2023). Transgranichnye regiony Dal’nego Vostoka [Transboundary Regions of the Far East]. In Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya. No. 3, pp. 73–84. DOI 10.24866/1998-6785/2023-3/73-84.
Bergelson, М., Kibrik, А., Raskladkina, М. (2020). The Language of a Lost Russian Region in the Historical Context of Russia’s Eastward Expansion. In Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 8. No. 3, pp. 916–936. DOI 10.15826/qr.2020.3.504.
Borzunov, V. F. (1972). Istoriya sozdaniya Transsibirskoi zheleznodorozhnoi magistrali XIX – nachala XX vv. [History of the Creation of the Trans-Siberian Railway in the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. Avtoref. dis. … dokt. ist. nauk. Moscow, S. n. 40 p.
Datsyshen, V. G. (2000). Ocherki istorii rossiisko-kitaiskoi granitsy vo 2-i polovine XIX – nachale XX veka [Essays on the History of the Russian-Chinese Border in the 2nd Half of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. Kyzyl, Respublikanskaya tipografiya. 215 p.
Demeshkina, T. A., Dutchak, E. E. (2020). Sotsiokommunikativnoe prostranstvo transgranich’ya: model’ rekonstruktsii kul’turno-yazykovogo landshafta Sibiri [Socio-Communicative Space of the Transborder: A Model for Reconstructing the Cultural and Linguistic Landscape of Siberia]. In Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. No. 67, pp. 28–44. DOI 10.17223/19986645/67/2.
Derevyanko, A. P. (1997). Sooruzhenie Ussuriiskoi zheleznoi dorogi (1891–1897 gg.) [Construction of the Ussuri Railway (1891–1897)]. In KVZhD i ee vliyanie na razvitie politicheskikh, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i kul’turnykh protsessov v Severo-Vostochnoi Azii. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya. Tezisy dokladov i soobshchenii. Vladivostok, Institut istorii, arkheologii i etnografii narodov Dal’nego Vostoka Dal’nevostochnogo otdeleniya RAN, pp. 105–107.
Dmitrieva, N. V. (2023). Na puti k KVZhD: finansovaya sostavlyayushchaya istorii stroitel’stva Kaidalovskoi zheleznodorozhnoi vetvi [On the Way to the Chinese Eastern Railway: Financial Aspects of the History of Kaidalovo Line Construction]. In Noveishaya istoriya Rossii. Vol. 13. No. 4, pp. 861–874. DOI 10.21638/spbu24.2023.410.
Dukes, P. (2022). Russia in Manchuria. A Problem of Empire. L., N. Y., Routledge. 159 p.
Glatolenkova, E. V., Bazilevich, M. E. (2023). Istoricheskaya sreda dal’nevostochnykh gorodov: nasledie Ussuriiskoi zheleznoi dorogi [Historical Environment of the Far Eastern Cities: The Legacy of the Ussuri Railway]. In Nauchno-tekhnicheskoe i ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo stran ATR v XXI veke. Trudy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii tvorcheskoi molodezhi s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Khabarovsk, 18–21 aprelya 2023 g.) v 2 t. Khabarovsk, Izdatel’stvo Dal’nevostochnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putei soobshcheniya. Vol. 1, pp. 508–511.
Golovnev, I., Golovneva, E. (2017). Dal’nii Vostok v fil’makh A. Litvinova: konstruirovanie obraza prostranstva [The Far East in the Films of A. Litvinov: Constructing the Image of Space]. In Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 5. No. 1, pp. 109–124. DOI 10.15826/qr.2017.1.214.
Grodekov, N. I. (1901). Vsepoddanneishii otchet Priamurskogo general-gubernatora generala ot infanterii Grodekova. 1898–1900 gody [The Humblest Report of the Amur Governor-General, Infantry General Grodekov. 1898–1900]. Khabarovsk, Tipografiya Kantselyarii priamurskogo general-gubernatora. 148 p.
Grodekov, N. I. (1902). Vsepoddanneishii otchet Priamurskogo general-gubernatora generala ot infanterii Grodekova. 1901 i 1902 gody [The Humblest Report of the Amur Governor-General, Infantry General Grodekov. 1901 and 1902]. Khabarovsk, Tipografiya Kantselyarii priamurskogo general-gubernatora. 69 p.
Illarionov, A. A. (2014). Istoricheskii opyt gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v transportnom osvoenii Primor’ya (na primere sooruzheniya Ussuriiskoi zheleznoi dorogi) [Historical Experience of Public-Private Partnership in the Transport Development of Primorye (with Reference to the Construction of the Ussuri Railway)]. In Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya. No. 2, pp. 51–60.
Khodyakov, M. V. (2023). Stantsiya Man’chzhuriya v nachale XX v.: problemy organizatsii upravleniya na zheleznoi doroge [Manchuria Railway Station in the Early 20th Century: Problems of Organisation of Management on the Railway]. In Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 8: Istoriya. Vol. 64. No. 4, pp. 97–106. DOI 10.55959/MSU0130-0083-8-2023-64-4-97-106.
Khodyakov, M. V. (Ed.). (2020). Tsentr i regiony: ekonomicheskaya politika pravitel’stva na okrainakh Rossiiskoi imperii (1894–1917) [The Centre and Regions: Economic Policy of the Government on the Outskirts of the Russian Empire (1894–1917)]. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 659 p.
Khodyakov, M. V., Zhao, Zh. (2023). Stroitel’stvo tserkvei v Zabaikal’e i Kitaisko-Vostochnaya zheleznaya doroga: Kaidalovskaya vetv’ na rubezhe XIX–XX vekov [Church Construction in Transbaikalia and the Chinese Eastern Railway: Kaydalovskaya Railway Branch at the Turn of the 20th Century]. In Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya. No. 22 (8), pp. 100–111. DOI 10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-8-100-111.
Krotova, M. V. (2023). Iz Evropy v Aziyu: KVZhD kak chast’ tranzitnogo puti [From Europe to Asia: CER as Part of the Transit Route]. In Novoe proshloe / The New Past. No. 4, pp. 270–279. DOI 10.18522/2500-3224-2023-4-270-279.
Kuras, L. V., Kal’mina L. V., Mikhalev A. V. (2018). Kapitany rossiiskoi vostochnoi politiki: rubezh XIX–XX vv. [Captains of Russian Eastern Policy: The Turn of the 20th Century]. Irkutsk, Ottisk. 111 p.
Lukin, A. V. (Ed.). (2013). Rossiya i Kitai: chetyre veka vzaimodeistviya. Istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya rossiisko-kitaiskikh otnoshenii [Russia and China: Four Centuries of Interaction. History, Current State and Prospects for the Development of Russian-Chinese Relations]. Moscow, Ves’ mir. 704 p.
Lukoyanov, I. V. (2008). “Ne otstat’ ot derzhav…”. Rossiya na Dal’nem Vostoke v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. [“Keeping up with the powers…” Russia in the Far East at the End of the 19th – Beginning of the 20th Centuries]. St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya. 668 p.
Magaziner, N. A. (2016). Zheleznodorozhnye khramy Transsibirskoi magistrali (konets XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Railway Churches of the Trans-Siberian Railway (Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries)]. St Petersburg, Renome. 216 p.
Malygina, O. A., Evtekhov, R. A., Palikova T. V. (2016). Formirovanie imperskikh institutov upravleniya v zabaikal’skom transgranich’e: problemy osvoeniya novykh territorii (XVIII – nachalo XX v.) [Formation of Imperial Institutions of Management in the Trans-Baikal Transborder Region: Problems of Development of New Territories (18th – Early 20th Centuries)]. In Bylye gody. Vol. 42. No. 4, pp. 1110–1117.
Marks, S. G. (1991). Road to Power: The Trans-Siberian Railroad and the Colonization of Asian Russia, 1850–1917. L., Tauris. 240 p.
Mikhalev, M. S. (2018). Trasgranich’e Rossii i Kitaya: potrebnost’ v antropologicheskom osmyslenii [Cross-Border Regions of Russia and China: The Need for Anthropological Understanding]. In Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka. No. 6, pp. 123–134. DOI 10.31857/S013128120002696-6.
Nikiforova, N. V. (2019). Istoriya Zabaikal’skoi zheleznoi dorogi (1887–1934 gg.) [History of the Transbaikal Railway (1887–1934)]. Avtoref. dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Irkutsk, S. n. 26 p.
Remnev, A. V. (2004). Rossiya Dal’nego Vostoka. Imperskaya geografiya vlasti XIX – nachala XX vekov [Russia of the Far East. Imperial Geography of Power in the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. Omsk, Omskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. 548 p.
RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 323. List 4. Dos. 16, 35; Stock 350. List 18. Dos. 1307; Stock 363. List 6. Dos. 151; Stock 373. List 2. Dos. 40; Stock 1162. List 1. OGE-1906. Dos. 2z; Stock 1273. List 1. Dos. 135.
Troitskaya, N. A. (Ed.). (2011). Zavetnaya mechta imperatora. K 120-letiyu nachala stroitel’stva Ussuriiskoi zheleznoi dorogi. Dokumenty i materialy [The Emperor’s Cherished Dream. For the 120th Anniversary of the Start of Construction of the Ussuri Railway. Documents and Materials]. Vladivostok, Dal’nauka. 155 p.
Trubitsyn, D. V. (2011). Transgranich’e kak ob’’ekt kul’turologicheskogo issledovaniya: metodologicheskii obzor [Transborder Region as an Object of Cultural Research: Methodological Review]. In Gumanitarnyi vektor. No. 2 (26), pp. 135–142.
Urbanski, S. (2023). Za stepnym frontirom: istoriya rossiisko-kitaiskoi granitsy [Beyond the Steppe Frontier: The History of the Russian-Chinese Border]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 478 p.
Vostochnyi vestnik [Vostochnyi Vestnik]. 1900. No. 7, 10.
Wolff, D. (1999). To the Harbin Station: The Liberal Alternative in Russian Manchuria, 1898–1914. Stanford, Stanford Univ. Press. 255 p.
