The Decolonization of the History of USSR’s Peoples in Soviet Historiography (1920–1930)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2024.1.873Keywords:
Soviet historiography, anti-colonial discourse, state-national narrative, J. V. Stalin, M. N. Pokrovsky, A. V. ShestakovAbstract
This article analyses the anti-colonial discourse in the Soviet historical science of the 1920s and 1930s. The work is based on both published materials and documents from the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. It is demonstrated that the anti-colonial discourse was built as an antithesis to the pre-revolutionary state-national historical narrative and was based on a radical and critical class analysis. In the 1920s, a kind of “historiographical sweep” took place, when, using class analysis, the students of M. N. Pokrovsky revealed the “great power” and “colonial” ideologems of the classics of Russian historical science and their followers. The anti-colonial vector of Soviet historiography was embodied in the historiographical concept of the “history of the peoples of the USSR”. It was assumed that all the peoples of the USSR were to receive a full-fledged place in history. However, since the mid‑1930s, there has been a drift from radical revolutionary anti-colonialism towards a more statesmanlike ideology and the development of consolidating concepts. The turning point was the meeting of historians with Stalin in March 1934, after which the process of transition from the concept of “the history of the peoples of the USSR” to “the history of the USSR” was launched, which was fixed in the Short Course of the History of the USSR (1937) edited by A. V. Shestakov. The international context also played a significant role in curtailing anticolonial rhetoric, since there were fears that foreign policy opponents would use this to divide the peoples of the USSR. Historians of the “old school”, who advocated the return to the concepts of pre-revolutionary historiography, also played a certain role in the correction. In turn, these concepts fit better into the current ideological situation and found support in the Central Committee of the CPSU(b). The marginalization of anti-colonial discourse occurs during the war and postwar period.
References
ARAN [Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Stock 359. List 1. Dos. 273, 303; Stock 638. List 1. Dos. 177; List 4. Dos. 24; Stock 1577. List 6. Dos. 13, 115, 162.
Artizov, A. N. (1995). Istoriograficheskie seminary M. N. Pokrovskogo [M. N. Pokrovsky’s Historiographical Seminars]. In Istoriya i istoriki. 1995. Moscow, Nauka, pp. 185–199.
Berkhofer, R. F., jr. (1998). Beyond the Great History as Text and Discourse. Cambridge, L., Harvard Univ. Press. XII, 381 p.
Brandenberger, D. (2017). Stalinskii russotsentrizm. Sovetskaya massovaya kul’tura i formirovanie russkogo natsional’nogo samosoznaniya (1931–1956 gg.) [Stalin’s Russocentrism: Soviet Mass Culture and the Formation of Russian National Identity (1931–1956)]. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. 407 p.
Brandenberger, D. (2021). Global in Form, Soviet in Content: The Changing Semantics of Internationalism in Official Soviet Discourse, 1917–1991. In The Russian Rev. No. 80, pp. 2–20. DOI 10.1111/russ.12331.
Drabkina, E. Ja. (1930). Natsional’nyi i kolonial’nyi vopros v tsarskoi Rossii. Posobie dlya vuzov, komvuzov i samoobrazovaniya [The National and Colonial Question in Tsarist Russia. Manual for Universities, Communist Universities and Self-Education]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Kommunisticheskoi akademii. 189 p.
Dubrovskii, A. M. (2017). Vlast’ i istoricheskaya mysl’ v SSSR (1930–1950‑e gg.) [Power and Historical Thought in the USSR (1930s–1950s)]. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. 621 p.
Golubev, A. (2023). No Natural Colonization: The Early Soviet School of Historical Anti-Colonialism. In Canadian Slavonic Papers. No. 2 (65), pp. 190–204. DOI 10.1080/00085006.2023.2199556.
Hirsh, Fr. (2022). Imperiya natsii. Etnograficheskoe znanie i formirovanie Sovetskogo Soyuza [Empire of Nations. Ethnographic Knowledge and the Formation of the Soviet Union]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 472 p.
Iggers, G., Van, Je. (2012). Global’naya istoriya sovremennoi istoriografii [The Global History of Modern Historiography]. Moscow, Kanon”1”, ROOI “Reabilitatsiya”. 432 p.
Istoricheskuyu nauku na uroven’ velikikh zadach. (Itogi XVII s’’ezda VKP(b) i zadachi bol’shevistskih istorikov) [Historical Science to the Level of Great Tasks (The Results of the 17th Congress of the CPSU (b) and the Tasks of Bolshevik Historians)]. (1934). In Istorik-marksist. No. 2, pp. 3–10.
Kondrat‘ev, S. V., Kondrat‘eva, T. N. (2003). Nauka “ubezhdat‘”, ili Spory sovetskikh istorikov o frantsuzskom absolyutizme i klassovoi bor‘be (20‑e – nachalo 50‑kh gg. XX veka) [The Science of “Persuasion”, or the Disputes of Soviet Historians about French Absolutism and Class Struggle (1920s – Early 1950s)]. Tyumen, Mandr i Co. 272 p.
Litvina, A. L. (Ed.). (2009). Dnevnik istorika S. A. Piontkovskogo (1927–1934) [Diary of Historian S. A. Piontkovsky (1927–1934)]. Kazan, Kazanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. 516 p.
Lozinskii, Z. (1927). S. M. Solov’ev – istorik velikoderzhavnoi Rossii [S. M. Solovyov – Historian of Great Power Russia]. In Russkaya istoricheskaya literatura v klassovom osveshchenii. Sbornik statei / preface, ed. by M. N. Pokrovsky. Iss. 1. Moscow, Izdanie Kommunisticheskoi akademii, pp. 205–276.
Martin, T. (2011). Imperiya “polozhitel’noi deyatel’nosti”. Natsii i natsionalizm v SSSR, 1923–1939 [The Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 855 p.
Pokrovsky, M. N. (2012). “Idealizm” i “zakony istorii” [“Idealism” and “Laws of History”]. In Pokrovsky, M. N. Istoricheskaya nauka i bor’ba klassov. Istoriograficheskie ocherki, kriticheskie stat’i i zametki v 2 t. 2nd Ed. Moscow, URSS. Vol. 2, pp. 36–37.
Pokrovsky, M. N. (Ed.). (1927). Russkaya istoricheskaya literatura v klassovom osveshchenii. Sbornik statei [Russian Historical Literature in Class Coverage. Collection of Articles]. Iss. 1. Moscow, Izdanie Kommunisticheskoi akademii. 422 p.
Pokrovsky, M. N. (Ed.). (1930). Russkaya istoricheskaya literatura v klassovom osveshchenii. Sbornik statei [Russian Historical Literature in Class Coverage. Collection of Articles]. Iss. 2. Moscow, Izdanie Kommunisticheskoi akademii. 416 p.
Rubach, M. A. (1930). Federalistskie teorii v istorii Rossii [Federalist Theories in the History of Russia]. In Pokrovsky, M. N. (Ed.). Russkaya istoricheskaya literatura v klassovom osveshchenii. Sbornik statei. Iss. 2. Moscow, Izdanie Kommunisticheskoi akademii, pp. 3–120.
Sakharov, A. N. (Ed.). (2016). Institut istorii Akademii nauk SSSR v dokumentakh i materialakh. [Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences in Documents and Materials]. Iss. 1. Moscow, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN. 317 p.
Tikhonov, V. V. (2014). Istoriki, ideologiya, vlast’ v Rossii XX veka. Ocherki [Historians, Ideology, and Power in 20th-Century Russia]. Moscow, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN. 217 p.
Tikhonov, V. V. (2023). Kak “Istoriya narodov SSSR” stala “Istoriei SSSR”: k voprosu o transformatsii ideologicheskih ustanovok sovetskogo kursa istorii v 1930‑e gody [How the “History of the Peoples of the USSR” Became the “History of the USSR”: On the Question of the Transformation of the Ideological Attitudes of the Soviet Course of History in the 1930s]. In Rossiya i sovremennyi mir. No. 4 (121), pp. 168–182. DOI 10.31249/rsm/2023.04.10.
Tikhonov, V. V. (2022). Ot “SSSR-tsev” do “sovetskogo naroda”: v poiskakh edinstva na 1/6 sushi planety Zemlya [From the “USSR-people” to the “Soviet People”: In Search of Unity on the 1/6 of the Earth’s Landmass]. In Novoe proshloe / The New Past. No. 4, pp. 188–201. DOI 10.18522/2500-3224-2022-4-188-201.
Tikhonov, V. V. (2021). “S russkim razmakhom i amerikanskoi delovitost’iyu”: kollektivnye i individual’nye formy organizatsii issledovanii v Institute istorii Akademii nauk SSSR [“With Russian Scope and American Efficiency”: Collective and Individual Forms of Research Organization at the Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences]. In Rossiiskaya istoriya. No. 5, pp. 144–154. DOI 10.31857/S086956870016624–7.
Tillett, L. (1969). The Great Friendship: Soviet Historians on the Non-Russian Nationalities. Chapel-Hill, Univ. of North Carolina Press. X, 468 p.
Trudy Pervoi Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii istorikov-marksistov. 28.XII.1928–4.I.1929 [Proceedings of the First All-Union Conference of Marxist Historians. 28.XII.1928–4.I.1929]. (1930). Vol. 1–. Moscow, Izdanie Kommunisticheskoi akademii. XV, 558 p.
Vinogradov, I. (1995). Zhizn’ i smert’ sovetskogo ponyatiya “druzhba narodov” [The Life and Death of the Soviet Concept of the “Friendship of Peoples”]. In Cahiers du Monde russe. No. 4 (36), pp. 455–462.
Whittington, A. (2019). Making a Home for the Soviet People: World War II and the Origins of the Sovetskii Narod. In Empire and Belonging in Eurasian Borderlands. Ithaka, L., Cornell Univ. Press, pp. 147–149.
Yilmaz, H. (2015). National Identities in Soviet Historiography: The Rise of Nations under Stalin. L., N. Y., Routledge. 256 p.
Yurganov, A. L. (2011). Russkoe natsional’noe gosudarstvo. Zhiznennyi mir istorikov epokhi stalinizma [The Russian National State. The Life World of Historians of the Stalin Era]. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet. 763 p.
Zelenov, M. V. (2000). Apparat TsK RKP(b) – VKP(b), tsenzura i istoricheskaya nauka v 1920‑e gody [The Apparatus of the Central Committee of the RCP(b) – the CPSU(b), Censorship and Historical Science in the 1920s]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhpoligraf. XVI, 538 p.
