Provincial Financing During the First Regional Reform. The Arkhangelsk Version
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.3.831Keywords:
Russia in the epoch of Peter the Great, province, burgomaster, lay self-government bodies, finances, expenditures, “the Archangelsk case”, A. A. Kurbatov, G. I. Koshelev, M. I. VolkonskyAbstract
Provincial institutions created by Peter I in 1710 were designed to ensure fiscal mobilisation, large-scale and maximum possible collection of material resources for the needs of warfare and the simultaneous reform of the armed forces. The first Russian governors had extensive administrative powers but, at the same time, they were under the strict financial control of the highest governing bodies: the Senate, its divisions, and the monarch himself. The governors were deprived of legal opportunities to spend at least some of the money collected through the provincial cash desks to ensure the functioning of their apparatus. It was not only about paying salaries to the ranks of provincial administrations, maintaining administrative buildings in working order, and purchasing consumables for office work. There was no money for more substantial expenditures: payment for the travel of numerous commissioners from the centre to the provinces, for the travel of their officials within the provinces, for the fees for the accommodation of these agents, for the expenses of their maintenance, for the payment of various kinds of state works, for the transportation of recruits and material supplies to the centre, i. e. everything that constituted the very essence of the functioning of local authorities. In this paradoxical situation, the main support could only be obtained from the zemstvo self-government bodies. The long-known practice of state bodies of local power being maintained by the population of the uyezd was replenished in the Petrine era with new elements. Lay fees covered the expenses of crown agents sent from the centre to the region and helped pay for some government work within the province. However, the peculiarities of the legislation of the era put the governors and their employees, who shifted the financial burden on the zemstvo, into a risky position. They could be accused of bribery and “unspecified fees” that undermined the solvency of the taxed population. Never previously published documents on Arkhangelsk province discovered by the author of the article reveal the complete picture of the financial support of the township communities of the Dvina uyezd for the activities of the provincial administration in 1711–1713 and the complex vicissitudes of relations between the central and local crown authorities and secular organisations. The documents were archived during the investigation of the case of the Arkhangelsk vice-governor A. A. Kurbatov and reflect one of the investigative episodes of 1716.
References
Bogoslovskii, M. M. (1909). Zemskoe samoupravlenie na russkom Severe v 2 t. [Zemstvo Self-Government in the Russian North. 2 Vols.]. Moscow, Izdanie Imperatorskogo obshchestva istorii i drevnostei rossiiskikh pri Moskovskom universitete. Vol. 1. Oblastnoe delenie Pomor’ya. Zemlevladenie i obshchestvennyi stroi. Organy samoupravleniya. 427 p.
Enin, G. P. (2000). Voevodskoe kormlenie v Rossii v XVII veke (soderzhanie naseleniem uezda gosudarstvennogo organa vlasti) [Voivodship Maintenance in Russia in the 17th Century (Maintenance of the State Authority by the Population of the Uyezd)]. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Rossiiskoi natsional’noi biblioteki. 352 p.
Kizevetter, A. A. (1903). Posadskaya obshchina v Rossii XVIII st. [Posad Community in 18th-Century Russia]. Moscow, Universitetskaya tipografiya. 810 p.
Milyukov, P. N. (1905). Gosudarstvennoe khozyaistvo Rossii v pervoi chetverti XVIII stoletiya i reforma Petra Velikogo [The State Economy of Russia in the First Quarter of the 18th Century and the Reform of Peter the Great]. 2nd Ed. St Petersburg, Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha. 678 p.
PSZ [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Collection 1. Vol. 4, 5.
Redin, D. A. (2007). Administrativnye struktury i byurokratiya Urala v epokhu petrovskikh reform (zapadnye uezdy Sibirskoi gubernii v 1711–1727 gg.) [Administrative Structures and Bureaucracy of the Urals in the Era of Peter the Great’s Reforms (Western Districts of Siberian Province in 1711‒1727)]. Yekaterinburg, Volot. 608 p.
Redin, D. A. (2019). Etyudi po russkoi istorii Novogo vremeni (administrativnyi i sotsialnyi aspekty) [Essays on Russian History in the Modern Times (Administrative and Social Aspects)]. Yekaterinburg, Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta. 284 p.
Redin, D. A. (Ed.). (2022). “Mental’noe gosudarstvo” Petra Velikogo i regiony v pervoi chetverti XVIII v.: materialy i issledovaniya po istorii mestnogo upravleniya v Rossii [“Mental State” of Peter the Great and Regions in the First Quarter of the 18th Century: Materials and Studies on the History of Local Government in Russia]. Yekaterinburg, Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta. 668 p.
RGADA [Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts]. Stock 214 (Sibirskii prikaz). List 5.
Dos. 2640; Stock 248 (Senat i ego uchrezhdeniya). Book 154; Stock 340 (Kantselyariya konfiskatsii). List 1. Dos. 63.
Serov, D. O. (2007). Administratsiya Petra I [Administration of Peter I]. Moscow, OGI. 288 p.
Serov, D. O., Fedorov, A. V. (2019). Dela i sud’by sledovatelei Petra I [Cases and Fate of the Investigators of Peter I]. 2nd Ed., add. Moscow, Yurist. 432 p.
Serov, D. O., Vidnichuk, A. O., Zhukovskaya, A. V., Fedyukin, I. I. (Eds.). (2023).
Pisma i bumagi pribyl’shchika Alekseya Kurbatova [Letters and Papers of Profiteer Alexei Kurbatov]. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 551 p.
