Conflict Landscapes of the Great War: The Spatial and Ecological Dimension of Military History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.2.806Keywords:
First World War, environmental history, military history, conflict landscapesAbstract
The spatial and environmental dimension of WWI has recently taken the central place in academic debates on the military history of the “short twentieth century”. At present, the large-scale conflict of humanity and nature under totalized warfare is recognized as no less significant to the existential experience of combatants and civilians than actual battles. Functioning as a demiurge, the Great War created and re-molded landscapes, accelerated development trends shaped during the industrial era, triggered the construction and demolition of infrastructure, and determined the resource policy, economic practices, and language constructs of national communities during subsequent historical periods. Textual and visual narratives of the war feature the following three dimensions of the environment: a subject and adversary (sometimes even more dangerous than the real enemy); an object of destruction, invasion, and ordering; and an anthropological construct defining behavioral strategies and the memorial culture relating to the conflict. Modern researchers share a unanimous opinion that the pivotal role of the clash between humanity and the environment during WWI for subsequent historical development is paradoxically at odds with the degree to which the clash has been studied. This may be linked with the fact that the multidimensionality of militarized landscapes would require a research methodology incorporating elements of military history, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, geology (landscape studies), and cultural geography. Such a creative symbiosis has become possible only recently, owing to the adoption of the interdisciplinary approach by military historians. The gradual uptake of innovative study techniques has resulted in the uneven development of the spatial and environmental history of the First World War as a research field: at present, the best-studied locations are confined to the western front and, partly, the colonial periphery. This publication presents a review of the recent conceptual publications by authors developing this research avenue and seeks to identify the heuristic potential of the concepts “Anthropocene”, “belligerent landscapes”, “landscape biographies”, and “layered landscapes”, including their applicability to the history of the Eastern Front of the First World War.
References
Baberovski, J. (2014). Vyzhzhennaya zemlya. Stalinskoe tsarstvo nasiliya [Scorched Earth. Stalinist Empire of Violence]. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. 488 p.
Brantz, D. (2009). Environments of Death: Trench Warfare on the Western Front, 1914–18. In Closmann, Ch. E. (Ed.). War and the Environment: Military Destruction in the Modern Age. Texas, A&M Univ. Press, pp. 68–91.
Bratochkin, A. (2021). Gorodskoe prostranstvo [City Space]. In Dubina, V., Zavadskii, A. (Eds.). Vse v proshlom. Teoriya i praktika publichnoi istorii. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo, pp. 35–53.
Bruno, A. (2007). Russian Environmental History: Directions and Potentials. In Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. Vol. 8. No. 3, pp. 635–650. DOI 10.1353/kri.2007.0031.
Carpentier, V., Ghesquière, E., Labbey, B., Marcigny, C. (2021). Archaeology, D-Day, and the Battle of Normandy. ‘The Longest Day’, a Landscape of Myth and Materiality. In Saunders, N. J., Cornish, P. L. (Eds.). Conflict Landscapes. Materiality and Meaning in Contested Places. N. Y., Routlege, pp. 260–273.
Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The Climate of History: Four Theses. In Critical Inquiry. Vol. 2, pp. 197–222. DOI 10.1086/596640.
Crosby, Jr. (1995). The Past and Present of Environmental History. In American Historical Rev. Vol. 100, pp. 1177–1189.
Crutzen, P. J., Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. In Intern. Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Newsletter. Vol. 41, p. 17.
Dornik, W. (2014). Kultureller Raum und Bewegungskrieg. Raumerfahrungen und Raumdeutungen zu Osteuropa in Selbstzeugnissen deutschsprachiger Kriegsteilnehmer der k.u.k. Armee. In Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift. Vol. 73. No. 2, pp. 367–388. DOI 10.1515/mgzs-2014-0016.
Haff, P. (2018). Being Human in the Anthropocene. In Nicolaus School for the Environment at the Duke University [website]. URL: https://blogs.nicholas.duke.edu/anthropocene/author/haffduke-edu/ (accessed: 23.05.2023).
Herzberg, J., Renner, A., Schierle, I. (2021). Introduction. The Russian Cold. In Herzberg, J., Renner, A., Schierle, I. (Eds.). The Russian Cold. Histories of Ice, Frost, and Snow. N. Y., Berghahn, pp. 3–18.
Keller, T. (N. d.). Destruction of the Ecosystem. In 1914–1918 Online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War [website]. URL: https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/destruction_of_the_ecosystem (accessed: 23.05.2023).
Kolen, J., Renes, J. (2015). Landscape Biographies: Key Issues. In Kolen, J., Renes, J., Hermans, R. (Eds.). Landscape Biographies. Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ. Press, pp. 21–47.
Laakkonen, S. (2017). Polemosphere: The War, Society, and the Environment. In Laakkonen, S., Tucker, R. P., Vuorisalo T. (Eds.). The Long Shadows: A Global Environmental History of the Second World War. Corvallis, Oregon State Univ. Press, pp. 15–37.
Laius, Yu. (2021). Okruzhayushchaya sreda [Environment]. In Dubina, V., Zavadskii, A. (Eds.). Vse v proshlom. Teoriya i praktika publichnoi istorii. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo, pp. 19–32.
Lannik, L. V. (2020). Posle Rossiiskoi imperii. Germanskaya okkupatsiya 1918 g. [After the Russian Empire. German Occupation of 1918]. St Petersburg, Evraziya. 528 p.
Lewin, K. (1917). Kriegslandschaften. In Angewandte Psychologie. No. 12, pp. 440–447.
Lieb, P., Nübel, Chr. (2014). Raum und Militärgeschichte. In Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift. Vol. 73. No. 2, pp. 77–83. DOI 10.1515/mgzs-2014-0011.
Mamin, R. G. (2011). Ekologiya voiny [War Ecology]. Moscow, Ekonomika. 493 p.
Nagornaya, O. S., Golubinov, Ya. A. (2021). Ekologicheskaya istoriya Pervoi mirovoi voiny na vostochnom fronte: lakuny istoriograficheskogo landshafta i issledovatel’skie perspektivy [Environmental History of WWI on the Eastern Front: Lacunas of Historical Landscapes and Research Perspectives]. In Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriya. No. 2 (53), pp. 5–16. DOI 10.17072/2219-3111-2021-2-5-16.
Nübel, Chr. (2014). Raum in der Militärgeschichte und Gewaltgeschichte. Probleme, Ergebnisse und neue Felder der Forschung. In Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift. Vol. 73. No. 2, pp. 285–307. DOI 10.1515/mgzs-2014-0012.
Peeples, J. A. (2011). Toxic Sublime: Imaging Contaminated Landscapes. In Environmental Communication. No. 5 (4), pp. 373–392. DOI 10.1080/17524032.2011.616516.
Pollack, M. (2014). Kontaminierte Landschaften. Wien, Rezidenz-Verlag. 120 S.
Renes, J. (2015). Layered Landscapes. A Problematic Theme in Historic Landscape Research. In Kolen, J., Renes, J., Hermans, R. (Eds.). Landscape Biographies. Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ. Press, pp. 403–421.
Roscher, M., Krebber, A., Mizelle, B. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of Historical Animal Studies. Berlin, DeGruyter. 637 p.
Saunders, N. J. (2018). Traces of Being: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on First World War Conflict Landscapes. In Daly, S., Salvante, M., Wilcox, V. (Eds.). Landscapes of the First World War. L., Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–224.
Saunders, N. J. (2021). The Dead and Their Spaces. Origin and Meanings in Modern Conflict Landscapes. In Saunders, N. J., Cornish, P. L. (Eds.). Conflict Landscapes. Materiality and Meaning in Contested Places. N. Y., Routlege, pp. 3–32.
Sloterdijk, P. (2010). Sfery. Plyural’naya sferologiya v 3 t. [Spheres. Plural Spherology. 3 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Nauka. Vol. 3. Pena. 595 p.
Sofsky, W. (2002). Zeiten des Schreckens. Amok, Terror, Krieg. Frankfurt a/M, S. Fischer Verlag. 256 S.
Steffen, W. et al. (2015). Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. In Science. Vol. 347. No. 6223. DOI 10.1126/science.1259855.
Stein, O. (2016). „Orientfahrten“. Deutsche Soldaten im Osmanischen Reich und der Krieg als Reiseerlebnis 1914 bis 1918. In Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift. Vol. 75. No. 2, pp. 327–358. DOI 10.1515/mgzs-2016-0068.
Stepun, F. (1926). Iz pisem praporshchika artillerista [From the Letters of an Artillery Warrant Officer]. Prague, Plamya. 192 p.
Stoler, A. L. (2013). Imperial Debris. On Ruins and Ruination. Durham, Duke Univ. Press. 357 p.
Trischler, H., Will, F. (2019). Die Provokationen des Anthropozäns. In Hessler, M., Weber, H. (Eds.). Provokationen der Technikgeschichte. Paderborn, Schöningh, pp. 69–106.
Tucker, R. P. et al. (Ed.). (2018). Environmental Histories of the First World War. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 312 p.
Winterburn, J. B. (2021). Conflict, Mobility, and Landscapes. The Arab Revolt in Southern Jordan, 1916–1918. In Saunders, N. J., Cornish, P. L. (Eds.). Conflict Landscapes. Materiality and Meaning in Contested Places. N. Y., Routlege, pp. 144–162.
Zalasiewicz, J. et. al. (2017). Scale and Diversity of the Physical Technosphere. A Geological Perspective. In The Anthropocene Rev. Vol. 4. No. 1, pp. 9–22. DOI 10.1177/2053019616677743.
Zalewska, A. I., Czarnecki, J. (2021). Conflict Gas-Scape. Chemical Weapons on the Eastern Front, January 1915. In Saunders, N. J., Cornish, P. L. (Eds.). Conflict Landscapes. Materiality and Meaning in Contested Places. N. Y., Routlege, pp. 66–84.
