The Value System of Today’s Students: From Family Well-Being to Self-Realisation




value preferences, questionnaire survey, students, well-being, family, self-realisation


The social changes of the modern era influence young people’s value preferences. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive linguo-cognitive and sociopsychological experimental study by a team of linguists from Ural Federal University, which aims to determine students’ value coordinates. In the first stage, based on the original procedure for revealing the key concepts of Russian mentality, the authors constructed a list of 59 nationwide core values and presented them to 633 first-year students at Ural Federal University. As a result of further content interpretation of the material, the researchers discovered that the generation of young people born in post-Soviet Russia is becoming a bearer of new values. The lack of interest in political institutions, the formation of self-mentalism, and micro-solidarity within the narrow circle of family and close people – these value preferences outlined a core of eight basic concepts, having an abstract nature, which required concretisation. At the next stage, the authors presented a questionnaire including a detailed semantic structure of nuclear concepts to first-year students (650 respondents) to determine the nuclear and peripheral conceptual meanings in students’ language consciousness. The cluster analysis of the material demonstrated that the top level of the dendrogram is occupied by the concept of the well-being of loved ones. The paper reveals the complex semantics of the “well-being” concept and shows the axiological dynamics in comprehending the axiologeme. According to historical and Church Slavonic lexicographic sources, the “well-being” linguistic unit has implicitly combined the values of the material, physical, ideal, and spiritual since the eleventh century. Twentieth-century dictionaries confirm the presence of two zones in the semantics of the concept, i. e. the inseparable unity of the spiritual and the material. Students express their choice in favour of the spiritual side of well-being. The article shows that on the upper levels of the dendrogram, there are four basic values in a complex: the concepts of family, self-realisation, faith, and happiness. Also, the authors confirm the status of the self-realisation value sense for young people at the student level, which is directly related to the family and its well-being. As for the cognitive attributes of the faith concept, the students preferred the selfrealisation value sense, which suggests that the respondents have faith in their abilities and capabilities, positive self-esteem, and trust in themselves. Values related to material well-being are on the periphery of the linguistic consciousness of Ural youth, which does not fit in the general picture of the observed pragmatic attitude of young people to modern reality. It has been suggested that the current picture of the hierarchy of value attributes is declarative: young people who have recently left school have a clear idea of the necessary norms of social behaviour established in Russian society, and they put spiritual values over material ones.

Author Biographies

Irina Vepreva

Dr. Hab. (Philology), Professor, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin.

19, Mira Str., 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-2230-1985

Tatiana Itskovich

Dr. Hab. (Philology), Professor, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin.

19, Mira Str., 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-5841-2943

Olga Mikhailova

Dr. Hab. (Philology), Professor, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin.

19, Mira Str., 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-2386-7411


Baudrillard, J. (2015). Simulyakry i simulyatsii [Simulacra and Simulations]. Moscow, Postum. 240 p.

BSTRYa – Kuznetsov, S. A. (Ed.). (1998). Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Big Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language]. St Petersburg, Norint. 1535 p.

Dahl, V. (1994). Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka v 4 t. [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language. 4 Vols.]. Moscow, TERRA-Knizhnyi klub. Vol. 1. A–Z. 1092 p.

Erikson, E. H. (1976). The Concept of Identity in Race Relations: Notes and Queries. In Dashefsky, A. Ethnic Identity in Society. Chicago, Rand McNall, pp. 59–72.

Kluckhohn, С. (1962). Culture and Behaviour. Collected Essays. N. Y., Free Press of Glencoe. 402 р.

Leont’ev, D. A. (2000). Tsennost’ [Value]. In Chelovek. Filosofsko-entsiklopedicheskii slovar’. Moscow, Nauka. 516 p.

MAS – Evgen’eva, A. P. (Ed.). (1988). Slovar’ russkogo yazyka v 4 t. [Russian Dictionary. 4 Vols.]. Moscow, Russkii yazyk. Vol. 1. A–I. 698 p.

Ovsyannikov, A. A. (2015). Novoe pokolenie. Dolgaya doroga v poiskakh novykh idealov i smyslov zhizni [The New Generation. A Long Walk in Search of New Ideals and Meanings in Life]. In Konferentsium ASOU. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov i materialov nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. No. 2, pp. 572–590.

Petrov, A. V. (2008). Peresechenie ponyatii “dobro” i “zlo” v etike i prave [The Intersection of “Good” and “Evil” in Ethics and Law]. In Nauka, obshchestvo, chelovek. Vestnik Ural’skogo otdeleniya RAN. No. 3, pp. 28–31.

Postmes, T., Lee, A. T., Novak, R. J. (2005). Individuality and Social Influence in Groups: Inductive and Deductive Routes to Group Identity. In J. of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 89 (5), pp. 747–763. DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747.

Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. N. Y., Free Press. 438 р.

Shanskii, N. M., Bobrova, T. A. (1994). Etimologicheskii slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Prozerpina, Shkola. 400 p.

Shchyutts, A. (2003). Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira. Ocherki po fenomenologicheskoi sotsiologii [The Meaningful Structure of the Everyday World. Essays in Phenomenological Sociology]. Moscow, Institut Fonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”. 336 p.

Tatarkevich, V. (1981). O schast’e i sovershenstve cheloveka [On Human Happiness and Perfection]. Moscow, Progress. 368 p.

Tikhon Zadonskii, prelate. (N. d.). Slovo na novyi (1765) god [A Word for the New (1765) Year]. In Bibliotechka pravoslavnoi literatury [website]. URL: (accessed: 10.11.2022).

Vepreva, I. T., Itskovich, M. M., Kupina, N. A., Shalina, I. V. (2016). Tsennostnye predpochteniya sovremennoi studencheskoi molodezhi v lingvokognitivnom i sotsiopsikhologicheskom osveshchenii [Value Preferences of Modern Student Youth in Linguistic-Cognitive and Socio-Psychological Light]. In Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. No. 2, pp. 62–73. DOI 10.20916/1812-3228-2016-2-62-73.

Vorkachev, S. G. (2001). Kontsept schast’ya: ponyatiinyi i obraznyi komponenty [The Concept of Happiness: Conceptual and Figurative Components]. In Izvestiya Akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka. Vol. 60. No. 6, pp. 47–58.



How to Cite

Vepreva, I., Itskovich, T., & Mikhailova, O. (2023). The Value System of Today’s Students: From Family Well-Being to Self-Realisation. Quaestio Rossica, 11(1), 277–288.



Problema voluminis