The Miserable with a Human Soul: Portrayal Modes in Works by F. Dostoevsky, N. Nekrasov, and F. Reshetnikov
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.1.775Keywords:
“poor folk”, “humiliated and insulted”, “the miserable”, natural school, F. Dostoevsky, N. Nekrasov, F. ReshetnikovAbstract
This article deals with the tradition of portraying “miserable”, “minuscule”, “tiny”, “poor”, “downtrodden” people in Russian literature between the 1840s and the 1860s. F. M. Dostoevsky, through the main character of The Idiot, called them “a misère” with a “human soul” and considered “the restoration” of the “ruined” the main idea of the art of the entire nineteenth century. The starting point of the research is Poor Folk, Dostoevsky’s novel of the natural school period in which the writer reversed sentimentalist poetics following the new demands of literature, emphasising the socio-economic meaning of the “poor folk” concept. In the 1860s, Dostoevsky’s sentimental-naturalistic style changed, and his feuilletons from the Petersburg Dreams, the discourse of poverty began to sound ironic; it was partly due to Dostoevsky’s polemical tasks. There is a connection with N. A. Nekrasov’s poetry in the middle of the century. It traces the change in the modality in the depiction of the “miserable” and the lower strata of the population from sympathetic drama to irony and sarcasm, which accompanies not so much the images of the poor themselves as the presence of the theme in literature, its traditionally philanthropic and sentimental personification. The material of the analysis in the article is In the Street and About the Weather, Nekrasov’s poetic cycles of the 1850s–1860s, most vividly depicting the images of the “poor folk” in St Petersburg’s streets and “Petersburg slums”. The third writer to focus on the urban poor, inhabitants of the basement slums is F. M. Reshetnikov with his story Yashka (1868). This writer’s story of entering the sphere of literature was comparable with that of the first edition of Dostoevsky’s novel. Reshetnikov himself, judging by his letters and diary, sometimes resembled the “miserable” characters of his much more famous and successful contemporary. Starting from the traditional forms of the author’s emotional experience for the character thrown to the bottom of life, Reshetnikov’s naïve and simple-hearted writing imitated normality, the commonness of the terrible life of his characters, concealed the warmth and human pain that the reader was supposed to perceive. It brought his “miserable” wordless characters closer to the author, and therefore to the reader, opening new possibilities in the literature that would be developed by writers of the turn of the century.
References
[Avseenko, V. G.] (1875). Real’naya belletristika [Real Fiction]. In Russkii vestnik. No. 4, pp. 671–704.
Belinsky, V. G. (1956). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 13 t. [Complete Works. 13 Vols.]. Moscow, Akademiya nauk SSSR. Vol. 12. Pis’ma. 596 p.
Dobrolyubov, N. A. (1972). Zabitye lyudi [Downtrodden People]. In Dobrolyubov, N. A. Literaturnaya kritika. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura, pp. 170–222.
Dostoevsky, F. M. (1972–1990). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 30 t. [Complete Works. 30 Vols.]. Leningrad, Nauka.
Herlt, J. (2019). “Na kakom rasstoyanii konchaetsya chelovekolyubie?” Tolstoi i Dostoevskii v 1877 godu: sotsial’naya epistemologiya romana [“At what Distance Does Philanthropy End?” Tolstoy and Dostoevsky in 1877: The Social Epistemology of the Novel]. In Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. No. 1 (155), pp. 42–61.
Korman, B. O. (2008). Izbrannye trudy. Istoriya russkoi literatury [Selected Works. History of Russian Literature]. Izhevsk, Udmurtskii universitet. 732 p.
Kubasov, A. V. (2017). Khudozhestvenno-dokumental’naya ocherkovaya proza F. M. Reshetnikova [Fiction and Documentary Essay Prose by F. M. Reshetnikov]. [S. l.], Izdatel’skie resheniya. 114 p.
Nekrasov, N. A. (1981–2000). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 15 t. [Complete Works. 15 Vols.]. Leningrad, Nauka.
Ospovat, K. (2020). “I dlya chego zhe takoe pisat’?”: “Bednye lyudi” i politicheskaya ekonomiya realizma [“And Why Write This?”: Poor Folk and the Political Economy of Realism]. In Vaisman, M., Vdovin, A., Kliger, I., Ospovat, K. (Eds.). Russkii realizm XIX veka: obshchestvo, znanie, povestvovanie. Sbornik statei. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 98–125.
Remizov, A. M. (2003). M. M. Prishvin [M. M. Prishvin]. In Remizov, A. M. Sobranie sochinenii v 10 t. Moscow, Russkaya kniga. Vol. 10, pp. 299–300.
Reshetnikov, F. M. (1936–1948). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 6 t. [Complete Works. 6 Vols.]. Sverdlovsk, OGIZ.
[Saltykov-Shchedrin, M. E.] (1869). Gde luchshe? Roman v dvukh chastyakh F. Reshetnikova [Where is it Better? A Novel in Two Parts by F. Reshetnikov]. In Otechestvennye zapiski. Vol. 183. No. 4, pp. 270–273.
Shelgunov, N. (1871). Narodnyi realizm v literature. (Sochineniya F. Reshetnikova) [Folk Realism in Literature. (Works by F. Reshetnikov)]. In Delo. No. 5, pp. 1–45.
Skabichevskii, A. M. (1909). Istoriya noveishei russkoi literatury. 1848–1908 gg. [The History of Modern Russian Literature. 1848–1908]. 7th Ed. St Petersburg, Izdanie F. Pavlenkova. 487 p.
Tyupa, V. I. (2002). Analitika khudozhestvennogo (vvedenie v literaturovedcheskii analiz) [Analytics of the Artistic (Introduction to Literary Analysis)]. Moscow, Labirint, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet. 192 p.
[Uspensky, G. I.] (1871). Nekrolog. F. M. Reshetnikov [Obituary. F. M. Reshetnikov]. In Otechestvennye zapiski. Vol. 195. No. 4, pp. 419–436.
Utin, E. (1869). Zadachi noveishei literatury [Tasks of New Literature]. In Vestnik Evropy. No. 12, pp. 832–888.
Vinogradov, V. V. (1976). Izbrannye trudy. Poetika russkoi literatury [Selected Works. Poetics of Russian Literature]. Moscow, Nauka. 516 p.
Warditz, V. (2014). Les Misérables Gyugo i formirovanie semantiki otverzhennosti v russkom yazyke [Les Misérables by Hugo and the Formation of the Semantics of Rejection in the Russian Language]. In Rev. des études slaves. Т. 135. No. 2, pp. 345–359. DOI 10.4000/res.531.
Yablokov, E. A. (1999). Padshii Devushkin, ili Chto pozvoleno byku [The Fallen Devushkin, or Quod Licet Bovi]. In Korona, V. V., Sozina, E. K. (Eds.). Arkhetipicheskie struktury khudozhestvennogo soznaniya. Sbornik statei. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi universitet, pp. 113–131.
Zhilyakova, E. M. (1989). Traditsii sentimentalizma v tvorchestve rannego Dostoevskogo (1844–1849) [Sentimentalism in the Works of Early Dostoevsky (1844–1849)]. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta. 272 p.
