Alexander I and the Resignation of M. M. Speransky
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.3.704Keywords:
M. M. Speransky, historiography, 19th-century Russian history, Alexander I, reforms, source criticismAbstract
This article analyses the historiographical traditions of studying the resignation of M. M. Speransky from the position of Secretary of State in March 1812. Also, the author considers the contradictions in various interpretations regarding the role Emperor Alexander I played in the events and demonstrates the connection of these contradictions with the way in which scholars relied on historical sources to substantiate their concepts. As a result, the article shows that many of the contradictions and ‘mysteries’ of the story followed an uncritical use of later sources that carry significant distortions. Additionally, the author demonstrates that some of the distortions were made deliberately, e. g. in the middle of the nineteenth century, J. de Saint-Glin, an active participant in the events, really wanted to influence the formation of versions behind Speransky’s resignation in historiography and in many ways succeeded in it. Firstly, a new analysis of the sources shows how accusations against Speransky accumulated in the hands of Alexander I, including the most serious of them – treason; and, secondly, what role the Ministry of Police and personally Saint-Glin could play in this. The article emphasises that Alexander I’s decision cannot be considered without regarding his emotional state on the eve of a new clash with Napoleon, which was decisive for the country and his personal fate. Letters from the emperor’s inner circle, namely, Professor G. F. Parrot, his friend, prove that. In this state, he could take accusations of treason seriously, and then he maintained a close interest in the investigation to such an extent that he was even ready to “shoot traitors”. After the wars of 1812–1815, Alexander I’s attitude towards the Speransky case changed so much that he recognised his own wrong and demonstrated readiness to return him to St Petersburg gradually. This approach makes some interpretations of historiography redundant, which previously emphasised the ‘duplicity’ of the emperor, his “acting”, and his desire to abandon the course of liberal reforms.
References
Andreev, A. Yu. (2020). Kto spas Speranskogo ot rasstrela? [Who Saved Speransky from Execution?]. In Rodina. No. 4, pp. 108–112.
Andreev, A. Yu. (2021). “Professor-romantik” G. F. Parrot i ego druzhba s imperatorom Aleksandrom I [The “Romantic Professor” G. F. Parrot and His Friendship with Emperor Alexander I]. In Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Istoriya. Istoriya Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi. Iss. 101, pp. 79–100. DOI 10.15382/sturII2021101.79-100.
Andreev, A. Yu. (2022). Istochniki ob otstavke Speranskogo v 1812 g.: opyt sistematicheskogo analiza [Sources on Speransky’s Resignation in 1812: A Systematic Analysis]. In Peterburgskii istoricheskii zhurnal. No. 3. (In print)
Chibiryaev, S. A. (1993). Velikii russkii reformator. Zhizn’, deyatel’nost’, politicheskie vzglyady M. M. Speranskogo [Great Russian Reformer. Life, Activity, Political Views of M. M. Speransky]. Moscow, Gazetno-zhurnal’noe ob”edinenie “Voskresen’e”. 238 p.
Deyateli i uchastniki v padenii Speranskogo (neizdannaya glava iz “Zhizni grafa Speranskogo” barona M. A. Korfa) [Figures and Participants in the Fall of Speransky (an Unpublished Chapter from the Life of Count Speransky by Baron M. A. Korf)]. (1902). In Russkaya starina. Vol. 109. No. 3, pp. 469–508.
Dmitriev, I. I. (1866). Vzglyad na moyu zhizn’ [A Look at My Life]. Moscow, Publ. M. A. Dmitriev. 315 p.
Druzheskie pis’ma grafa M. M. Speranskogo k P. G. Masal’skomu, pisannyye s 1798 po 1819 g. [Friendly Letters from Count M. M. Speransky to P. G. Masalsky Written from 1798 to 1819]. (1862). St Petersburg, Tipografiya II Otdeleniya Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantselyarii. 142 p.
Dvenadtsatyi god v zapiskakh V. I. Bakuninoi [The Year 1812 in the Notes of V. I. Bakunina]. (1885). In Russkaya starina. Vol. 47. No. 9, pp. 391–410.
Fyodorov, V. A. (1997). M. M. Speranskii i A. A. Arakcheev [M. M. Speransky and A. A. Arakcheev]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 255 p.
GARF [State Archive of the Russian Federation]. Stock 728. No. 1678.
Gotovtseva, A. G. (2018). “On vsegda budet zhertvoi intrig”: pridvornaya bor’ba Aleksandrovskoi epokhi ['He Will Always Be a Victim of Intrigues': The Court Struggle of the Alexander Era]. In Rossiya i sovremennyi mir. No. 1 (98), pp. 8–28.
Hauenschild, F. F. (1902). M. M. Speransky [M. M. Speransky]. In Russkaya starina. Vol. 110. No. 5, pp. 251–262.
Korf, M. A. (1861). Zhizn’ grafa Speranskogo v 2 t. [Life of Count Speransky. 2 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Izdanie Imperatorskoi publichnoi biblioteki. Vol. 2. 388 p.
LVVA. F. 7350. Apr. 1. № 8, 9.
Nikolaenko, P. D. (2016). Ministr politsii A. D. Balashov i opala M. M. Speranskogo [Minister of Police A. D. Balashov and the Disgrace of M. M. Speransky]. In Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossii. No. 1 (69), pp. 27–33.
Nolde, A. E. (2004). Speranskii. Biografiya [Speransky. Biography]. Moscow, Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii. 304 p.
Pogodin, M. P. (1871). Speranskii (posvyashchayetsya baronu M. A. Korfu) [Speransky (Dedicated to Baron M. A. Korf)]. In Russkii arkhiv. No. 7, pp. 1097–1252.
RGADA [Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts] Stock 6. List 1. Dos. 557; Stock 11. List 1. Dos. 1151.
Rostopchin, F. V. (1889). Tysyacha vosem’sot dvenadtsatyi god [1812]. In Russkaya starina. Vol. 64. No. 2, pp. 643–725.
Sanglen, Ya. I. de. (2016). Zapiski. 1793–1831. [Memoirs. 1793–1831]. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole. 256 p.
Schilder, N. K. (1897). Imperator Aleksandr I: ego zhizn’ i tsarstvovanie v 4 t. [Emperor Alexander I: His Life and Reign. 4 Vols.] St Petersburg, Publ. A. S. Suvorin. Vol. 3. 569 p.
Semevskii, V. I. (1911). Padenie Speranskogo [The Fall of Speransky]. In Otechestvennaya voina i russkoe obshchestvo v 7 t. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Tovarishchestva I. D. Sytina. Vol. 2, pp. 221–245.
Skrydlov, A. Yu. (2013). M. M. Speranskii i A. D. Balashov: k voprosu o roli ministra politsii v intrige protiv gosudarstvennogo sekretarya [M. M. Speransky and A. D. Balashov: On the Role of the Minister of Police in the Intrigue against the Secretary of State]. In Klio. No. 4 (76), pp. 106–109.
Speransky (1892). I. Permskoe pis’mo k Aleksandru Pavlovichu. II. Opravdatel’naya zapiska (soobshcheno N. K. Shil’derom) [I. Letter from Perm to Alexander Pavlovich. II. Exculpatory Note (Reported by N. K. Schilder)]. In Russkii arkhiv. No. 1, pp. 50–78.
Ssylka Speranskogo v 1812 godu (dopolnitel’nye materialy k “Zhizni grafa Speranskogo” barona M. A. Korfa) [Exile of Speransky in 1812 (Additional Materials to the Life of Count Speransky by Baron M. A. Korf)]. (1902). In Russkaya starina. Vol. 110. No. 4, pp. 5–44.
Tomsinov, V. A. (1991). Svetilo russkoi byurokratii. Istoricheskii portret M. M. Speranskogo [The Light of Russian Bureaucracy. Historical Portrait of M. M. Speransky]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya. 336 p.
Turgenev, N. I. (2001). Rossiya i russkie [Russia and Russians]. Moscow, OGI. 744 p.
Vigel’, F. F. (1928). Zapiski v 2 t. [Memoirs. 2 Vols.]. Moscow, Krug. Vol. 2. 355 p.
Vyderzhki iz zapisok A. Ya. Bulgakova [Excerpts from the Notes of A. Ya. Bulgakov]. (1867). In Russkii arkhiv. No. 12, pp. 1361–1174.
Yuzhakov, S. N. (1892). M. M. Speranskii: ego zhizn’ i obshchestvennaya deyatel’nost’ [M. M. Speransky: His Life and Social Activities]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya tovarishchestva “Obshchestvennaya pol’za”. 88 p.
Zapiska o martinistakh, predstavlennaya v 1811 godu grafom F. V. Rostopchinym velikoi knyagine Ekaterine Pavlovne [A Note on the Martinists, Presented in 1811 by Count F. W. Rostopchin to Grand Duchess Ekaterina Pavlovna]. (1875). In Russkii arkhiv. No. 9, pp. 75–81.
Zorin, A. L. (2001). Kormya dvuglavogo orla… Literatura i gosudarstvennaya ideologiya v Rossii v poslednei treti XVIII – pervoi treti XIX veka [Feeding the Double-Headed Eagle… Literature and State Ideology in Russia in the Last Third of the 18th – First Third of the 19th Centuries]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 416 p.
