The Reflection of Dostoevsky’s Underground Man in Faulkner’s Sartoris




F. Dostoevsky, W. Faulkner, K. G. Jung, archetype, Underground Man


This article is devoted to the comparative typological research related to the ‘Underground Man’, as featured in the works of F. Dostoevsky and W. Faulkner. Based on the study of the phenomenon of moral alienation – the “underground” embodied in the character of the storyteller in Dostoevsky’s novella, Notes from Underground – we identify its reflection in Faulkner’s novel, Sartoris. The relevance of this study is due to the importance of the “underground”, which has not lost its significance in either Russia or the West. The character of the Underground Man, admittedly archetypal, has become part of the vocabulary of modern culture, and the novella Notes from Underground is rightly called the prologue to twentieth-century literature. The novelty of the present study is that, despite the existence of a number of works focused on the study of the “underground” in the literary world of Dostoevsky, and the wide scope for a comparative analysis of the works of Dostoevsky and Faulkner, the problem of the “underground” has not previously been considered from this perspective. This study draws on a number of methodologies alongside the comparative typological, including the doctrine of archetypes originated in late antique philosophy, the theory of archetypes first developed by C. G. Jung, and the archetypal approach found in literary criticism. As the results of the study show, in the archetypal character of the Underground Man, the model of “underground” consciousness is clearly expressed (Man-god consciousness, one’s own inconsistencies with the ideal, cruel self-punishment and aesthetization of it, estrangement, and spiritual decay) and may be defined – in a broad sense – at the stage of the formation of an “underground” worldview; and in a narrower sense – when complete moral alienation results in a state of “underground”. Idealization of the past, depicted in Sartoris (the “heroism” of young Bayard, the symbolic “deafness” of old Bayard, the “serenity” of Narcissa, the infantilism and desire to hide from life in a house surrounded by cedars demonstrated by her brother Horace), is functionally similar to the feeling of “sublime and beautiful” by the Underground Man of Dostoevsky and reflects the Man-god consciousness leading the characters of the novel to moral estrangement (“underground” in the broad sense). In the character of young Bayard, the “underground” matrix is fully realized, which allows us to define him as the actual Underground Man (“underground” in the narrow sense).

Author Biography

Yuri Romanov

PhD (Philology), Associate Professor, National Technical University Kharkov Polytechnic Institute.

2, Kirpichev Str., 61002, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

ORCID 0000-0002-7819-3119


Abernathy, K. L. (2000). The Poetics of Suicide: A Search for Meaning. Dis. … Doctor of Philosophy in Literature. Ann Arbor, S. n. 284 p.

Anastas’ev, N. A. (1991). Vladelets Ioknapatofy (Uil’yam Folkner) [The Owner of Yoknapatawpha (William Faulkner)]. Moscow, Kniga. 416 p.

Averintsev, S. S. (1980). Arkhetipy [Archetypes]. In Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya v 2 t. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 1, pp. 110–111.

Banakh-Manikina, A. V. (2006). Obraz “sluchainogo semeistva” v vospriyatii U. Folknera (roman “Avessalom, Avessalom!”) [The Type of an “Accidental Family” as Perceived by W. Faulkner (the Absalom, Absalom! Novel)]. In Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Byulleten’ operativnoi nauchnoi informatsii (teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty literaturovedeniya). No. 80, pp. 6–16.

Bloshteyn, M. R. (2004). “Anguish for the Sake of Anguish” – Faulkner and his Dostoevskian Allusion. In The Faulkner Journal. Vol. 19. No. 2, pp. 69–90.

Bodmer, M. J. (2013). Monumentalizing Flem’s Footprints: Flem Snopes as Archetypal Hero in William Faulkner’s Snopes Trilogy. Thesis … MA in English. Ann Arbor, S. n. 104 p.

Bricker, E. S. (1971). Duality in the Novels of William Faulkner and Fyodor Dostoevsky. Dis. … Doctor of Philosophy in English Language and Literature. Ann Arbor, S. n. 327 p.

Chapple, R. L. (1976/78). Character Parallels in Crime and Punishment and Sanctuary. In Germano-Slavica. A Canadian J. of Germanic and Slavic Comparative Studies. Vol. 2. No. 1, pp. 5–14.

Dostoevsky, F. Notes from the Underground. In The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation [website]. URL: (accessed: 08.10.2021).

Dostoevsky, F. M. (1972‒1990). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 30 t. [Complete Works. 30 Vols.]. Leningrad, Nauka. Vol. 5. 407 p.

Esaulov, I. A. (1998). Paskhal’nyi arkhetip v poetike Dostoevskogo [Easter Archetype in Poetics of Dostoevsky]. In Zakharov, V. N. (Ed.). Evangel’skii tekst v russkoi literature XVIII–XX vekov: tsitata, reministsentsiya, motiv, syuzhet, zhanr. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Petrozavodsk, Izdatel’sto Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Iss. 2, pp. 349–362. Faulkner, W. (1954). Sartoris. L., Chatto & Windus. 380 p.

Frank, J. (1986). Dostoevsky: The Stir of Liberation, 1860–1865. Princeton, N. J., Princeton Univ. Press. XV, 395 p.

Garin, I. I. (1997). Mnogolikii Dostoevskii [The Many Faces of Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Terra. 396 p.

Guerard, A. J. (1976). The Triumph of the Novel: Dickens, Dostoevsky, Faulkner. N. Y., Oxford Univ. Press. 365 p.

Gwynn, F. L., Blotner, J. L. (1957). Faulkner in the University: A Classroom Conference. In College English. Vol. 19. No. 1, pp. 1–6.

Howe, I. (1951). The Southern Myth and William Faulkner. In American Quarterly. Vol. 3. No. 4, pp. 357–362.

Jung, C. G. (2010). Four Archetypes: (from Vol. 9, Part 1 of the Collected Works of C. G. Jung). Princeton, N. J., Princeton Univ. Press. IX, 175 p.

Kellog, J. D. (1975). Dark Prophets of Hope: Dostoevsky, Sartre, Camus, Faulkner. Chicago, Loyola Univ. Press. VIII, 200 p.

Kerr, E. M. (1985). William Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha. A Kind of Keystone in the Universe. N. Y., Fordham Univ. Press. 438 p.

Kinney, A. F. (Ed.). (1985). Critical Essays on William Faulkner: The Sartoris Family. Boston, G. K. Hall. 374 p.

Kostyakov, V. A. (1973). Folkner i Dostoevskii [Faulkner and Dostoevsky]. In Amerikanskaya literatura. Problemy romantizma i realizma. Krasnodar, S. n. Iss. 2, pp. 86–99.

Miller, B. B. (1977). William Faulkner’s Thomas Sutpen, Quentin Compson, Joe Christmas: A Study of the Hero-archetype. Dis. … Doctor of Philosophy in Literature. Ann Arbor, S. n. VI, 157 p.

Nikolyukin, A. N. (1987). Uroki masterstva (Dostoevskii i Folkner) [Lessons of Pencraft (Dostoevsky and Faulkner)]. In Literaturnaya ucheba. No. 1, pp. 159–165.

Pisani, A. S. (1976). The Raging Impotence: Humour in the Novels of Dostoevsky, Faulkner and Beckett. Dis. … Doctor of Philosophy. Ann Arbor, S. n. 277 p.

Rabinowitz, P. J. (1978/1979). The Click of the Spring: The Detective Story as Parallel Structure in Dostoevsky and Faulkner. In Modern Philology. No. 76, pp. 355–369.

Romanov, Yu. A. (2016). “Podpol’e” gospodina Prokharchina [Mr. Procharčin’s “Underground”]. In Russian Literature. Vol. 86, pp. 67–78. DOI 10.1016/j.ruslit.2016.11.004.

Romanov, Yu. A. (2015). O traditsiyakh F. M. Dostoevskogo v tvorchestve U. Folknera [On F. M. Dostoevsky’s Traditions in W. Faulkner’s Works]. In Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 5, pp. 52–56.

Rommel, L. D. (2004). A Poetics of Shame, and the Literary Meaning of Kenosis. Dis. … Doctor of Philosophy in Literature. Ann Arbor, S. n. 298 p.

Rozanov, V. V. (1995). Odna iz zamechatel’nykh idei Dostoevskogo [One of Dostoevsky’s Great Ideas]. In Rozanov, V. V. O pisatel’stve i pisatelyakh. Sobranie sochinenii. Moscow: Respublika, pp. 487–494.

Saxton, B. (2012). Grotesque Subjects: Dostoevsky and Modern Southern Fiction, 1930–1960. Dis. … Doctor of Philosophy. Ann Arbor, S. n. 205 p.

Smith, J. (2016). Religious Feeling and Religious Commitment in Faulkner, Dostoyevsky, Werfel and Bernanos. L., Routledge. 306 p.

Sokhryakov, Yu. I. (1980). Traditsii Dostoevskogo v vospriyatii T. Vulfa, U. Folknera i D. Steinbeka [Dostoevsky’s Traditions in the Perception of T. Wolfe, W. Faulkner, and D. Steinbeck]. In Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniya. Leningrad, Nauka. Iss. 4, pp. 144–158.

Stepanyan, K. A. (1986). K istorii povestvovatel’nykh form (na materiale proizvedenii F. M. Dostoevskogo i U. Folknera) [On the History of Narrative Forms (Based on the Works of F.M. Dostoevsky and W. Faulkner)]. In Kontekst 1985. Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniya. Moscow, Nauka, pp. 74–101.

Stepanyan, K. A. (2010). Yavlenie i dialog v romanakh F. M. Dostoevskogo [The Manifestation of Christ and the Dialogue in F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novels]. St Petersburg, Kriga. 400 p.

Weisgerber, J. (1968). Faulkner’s Monomaniacs: Their Indebtedness to Raskolnikov. In Comparative Literature Studies. Vol. 5. No. 2, pp. 181–193.

Zakharov, V. N. (1998). Pravoslavnye aspekty etnopoetiki russkoi literatury [Orthodox Aspects of Ethno-Poetics of Russian Literature]. In Zakharov, V. N. (Ed.). Evangel’skii tekst v russkoi literature XVIII–XX vekov: tsitata, reministsentsiya, motiv, syuzhet, zhanr. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Petrozavodsk, Izdatel’sto Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Iss. 2, pp. 5–30.



How to Cite

Romanov, Y. (2021). The Reflection of Dostoevsky’s Underground Man in Faulkner’s Sartoris. Quaestio Rossica, 9(4), 1458–1472.