The Culture-Centred Paradigm in Contemporary Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.2.587Keywords:
contemporary art, culture, postmodernism, socio-cultural revolution, traditional art, culture-centrismAbstract
This article aims to explain the general features of contemporary art and its radical novelty. While recognising the importance of postmodernism as a marker of the boundary of cultural epochs, the author argues that it is impossible either to reduce the features of contemporary art to postmodernism or to explain them through the foundations of postmodernism. In its own way, postmodernism sums up the great past of the history of humankind. Contemporary art expresses the trends of its development and movement towards the future of human civilization. Several examples illustrate the novel essence of contemporary art – its appeal to the representation and mastery of diverse cultural phenomena as an independent and self-sufficient specific reality. The universality and growing scale of contemporary art that concentrates on cultural phenomena make it necessary to link its emergence and characteristics to the radical socio-cultural evolution (peaceful revolution) of our era. The essence and scale of this unfolding process lie in the qualitative growth of productive nature-transforming and socio-organising, material, informational, and spiritual abilities of culture both as a specific and universal way of existence and development for human societies and individuals and as a particular world (“supra-natural”). The scale of the power and impact of culture on the life of modern humanity and each person and the visible prospects of its future progress are such that they are capable of transforming culture from “second nature” (its traditional definition) into first nature – the main determining principle of the life of humankind. This objective process defines a qualitative change of the entire cultural consciousness, first and foremost the subsystem most sensitive to novelty and responsive to radical alterations of cultural life, i. e. artistic consciousness. This is expressed by the birth, establishment, and evolution of a new culture-centred paradigm of cultural consciousness alongside the one which has existed for millennia, programmed to represent nature and human life (nature-centred).
References
Art since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism. 2 Vols. (2005). 2nd Ed. L., Thames & Hudson Publ. Vol. 2. 1945 to the Present. 344 p.
Barkovskaya, N. V. (2020). Estetizatsiya obydennogo: “Vyazanik” Leonida Tishkova [Aestheticisation of the Ordinary: A Knitted Man by Leonid Tishkov]. In Zaks, L. A., Kruglova, T. A. (Eds.). Mezhdu avtonomiei i proteizmom: formy/sposoby sotsiokul’turnogo bytiya i granitsy sovremennogo iskusstva. Yekaterinburg, Gumanitarnyi universitet, pp. 193–208.
Barnes, J. P. (2013). Popugai Flobera [Flaubert’s Parrot]. Moscow, EKSMO. 352 p.
Barthes, R. (1999). Fragmenty rechi vlyublennogo [A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments]. Moscow, Ad Marginem. 431 p.
Bourriaud, N. (2016). Relyatsionnaya estetika / postproduktsiya [Relational Aesthetics / Postproduction]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 216 p.
Cioran, E. M. (2004). Priznaniya i proklyatiya. Filosofskaya esseistika [Confessions and Curses. Essays on Philosophy]. St Petersburg, Simpozium. 206 p.
Currie, M. (1998). Postmodern Narrative Theory. N. Y., Palgrave. 184 p.
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2015). Estetika performativnosti [The Aesthetics of Performativity]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnoe teatral’noe agentstvo “Play&Play”, Kanon+. 376 p.
Grois, B. (2020). Tomas Shyutte: Pobeg iz tyur’my stilya [Thomas Schütte: An Escape from the Prison of Style]. In Chastnye sluchai. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, Muzei sovremennogo iskusstva “Garazh”, pp. 76–93.
Hassan, I. (1971). The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodernist Literature. Urbana, Oxford Univ. Press. 315 p.
Hutcheon, L. (2004). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. N. Y., Routledge. 268 p.
Kagan, M. S. (1974). Chelovecheskaya deyatel’nost’ [Man’s Activity]. Moscow, Politizdat. 328 p.
Kleiman, Yu. (2020). Gorod i ego iznanka: Sankt-Peterburg i sait-spetsificheskie teatral’nye opyty [The City and Its Underside: St Petersburg and Site-Specific Experiments]. In Bogdanova, P. (Ed.). Metamorfozy teatral’nosti. Razomknutye formy. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 177–192.
Krauss, R. (2017). “Puteshestvie po Severnomu moryu”: iskusstvo v epokhu postmedial’nosti [A Journey across the North Sea: Art in the Epoch of Post Mediality]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press. 104 p.
Lehmann, H.-T. (2013). Postdramaticheskii teatr [The Post-Dramatic Theatre]. Moscow, ABCdesign. 312 p.
Malinina, E. V. (2020). Sovremennaya khudozhestvennaya kul’tura kak tvorets novykh form publichnogo: opyt teatral’noi Permi [Contemporary Artistic Culture as a Creator of Novel Forms of the Public: Perm’s Theatrical Practices]. In Publichnoe/chastnoe v sovremennoi tsivilizatsii. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov XXII rossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) (g. Ekaterinburg, 16–17 aprelya 2020 goda). Yekaterinburg, Gumanitarnyi universitet. pp. 103–109. DOI 10.35853/UfH-Public/Private-2020-13.
Malraux, A. (2005). Voobrazhaemyi Muzei: golosa bezmolviya [The Imaginary Museum: The Voices of Silence]. Moscow, KRUK-Prestizh. 253 p.
Martynov, V. I. (2002). Konets vremeni kompozitorov [The End of Composers’ Time]. Moscow, Russkii put’. 296 p.
Martynov, V. I. (2005). Zona opus posth, ili Rozhdenie novoi real’nosti [The Zone of Opus Posth, or the Birth of a New Reality]. Moscow, Klassika-XXI. 288 p.
McHale, B. (1987). Postmodernist Fiction. L., Routledge. 278 p.
Miroshkin, A. Zateryannaya rukopis’. Istoriya i voobrazhenie v romanakh Vladimira Sharova [The Lost Manuscript. History and Imagination in the Novels of Vladimir Sharov]. In Labirint [website]. URL: https://www.labirint.ru/now/sharov/ (accessed: 05.01.2021).
Revzin, I. I., Revzina, O. G. (1971). Semioticheskii eksperiment na stsene. (Narushenie postulata normal’nogo obshcheniya kak dramaturgicheskii priem) [A Semiotic Experiment on the Stage (The Violation of Normal Communication Postulates as a Dramaturgical Technique]. In Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Tartu, S. n. Iss. 5, pp. 232–254. (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Iss. 284).
Schechner, R. (2020). Teoriya performansa [The Theory of Performance]. Moscow, V-A-C Press. 488 p.
Schweitzer, A. (1992). Blagogovenie pered zhizn’yu [Reverence for Life]. Moscow, Progress. 576 p.
Shishkin, M. (2019). Bukva na snegu [A Letter in the Snow]. Moscow, AST. 192 p.
Yarkova, E. N. (2020). Kul’turotsentrizm kak strategiya bytiya i poznaniya [Culture-Centrism as a Strategy for Life and Cognition]. In Koinon. Vol. 1. No 1–2, pp. 199–215. DOI 10.15826/koinon.2020.01.1–2.010.
Zaks, L. A. (2013). Ekaterinburg: khozyain mednoi gory [Yekaterinburg: The Master of the Copper Mountain]. In Teatr. No. 9, pp. 53–61.
Zaks, L. A. (2017). K poznaniyu spetsifiki sovremennogo iskusstva: kul’turotsentristskaya paradigma khudozhestvennogo soznaniya [To Cognising the Specificity of Contemporary Art: A Culture-Centred Paradigm of Artistic Consciousness]. In Khudozhestvennaya spetsifika i sotsial’nyi potentsial sovremennogo iskusstva. Sbornik nauchnykh statei. Yekaterinburg, Gumanitarnyi universitet, pp. 43–103.
Zaks, L. A. (2018). Sovremennaya evolyutsiya/revolyutsiya kul’tury i formirovanie kul’turotsentristskoi paradigmy soznaniya (na primere filosofii i sotsiogumanitarnykh nauk) [Contemporary Evolution/Revolution of Culture and the Formation of the Culture-Centred Paradigm of Consciousness (with Reference to Philosophy, Social Sciences and the Humanities)]. In Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki. Vol. 13. No. 4 (182), pp. 40–53; 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1 (185), pp. 154–166.
