To Establish a Proper Kyrgyz Centre: National and Territorial Delimitation and the Capitals of Kazakhstan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.1.583Keywords:
USSR, Kazakh ASSR, delimitation, capital, ethnic policy, ethnic elitesAbstract
This article considers the interconnection between national and territorial delimitation in the Central Asian region in the 1920s and the relocation of the Kazakh ASSR’s capital from Orenburg to Kzyl-Orda and then to Alma-Ata. Referring to documents, the author demonstrates how the Kazakh ethnopolitical elite used the new opportunities that emerged in this regard to ensure the national character of the Soviet autonomous region in the way that seemed the most appropriate to them. Orenburg, which became its capital upon the establishment of the Kazakh ASSR in 1920, did not look suitable; besides, the autonomous authorities had to take into account the presence of the independent authorities and management of Orenburg Province, whose representatives also experienced discomfort due to the city’s dual status. When interacting with the centre, represented by the Politburo and the Central Committee of the CPSU(b), the national leaders of Kazakhstan put forward various options for internal reorganisation and the accumulation of all possible resources in their hands. The so-called “Europeans”, i. e. Moscow envoys who led the autonomous region’s party organisation, were not only to mediate between the centre and the local elite but also establish a balance between the competing factions within it. The author also focuses on the rivalry between Kazakh politicians and the authorities of the Turkestan ASSR and the struggle for the inclusion of Tashkent and nearby Turkestan territories inhabited by Kazakhs into the Kazakh ASSR. This exposed intra-elite contradictions caused by the regional and ethno-social factors of nation-building and competition for financial, economic, administrative, and organisational resources. The article demonstrates that complex natural and climatic conditions, the nomadic nature of Kazakh society and its negligible degree of urbanisation, and a lack of proper infrastructure played a special role in the geography of Kazakhstan’s capital in the 1920s. In the context of accelerated modernisation, the government sought to combine the policy of national self-determination with ensuring the manageability and stability of a culturally complex region and strengthening interregional economic connections. The “migrations” of the Kazakh capital were also connected with the need to create an example of successful interaction between Moscow and national elites, as well as form an ethno-cultural centre that met symbolic requirements.
References
let Kazakhstana (1920–1925). Yubileinyi sbornik [5 Years of Kazakhstan (1920–1925). Jubilee Collection]. (1925). Kzul-Orda, Tsentral’nyi ispolnitel’nyi komitet Kazakskoi ASSR. 72 p.
Akanov, K. G. (2019). Istoriya stolits Kazakhstana v XX veke: oput sozdaniya, peredislokatsii i voprosy natsiestroitel’stva [The History of the Capitals of Kazakhstan in the 20th Century: Experience of Creation, Relocation, and Issues of Nation-Building]. Dis. … dokt. filosofii (PhD). Nur-Sultan, S. n. 178 p.
Amanzholova, D. A. (2019). Sovetskii proekt v Kazakhstane: vlast‘ i etnichnost‘. 1920–1930-е gg. [The Soviet Project in Kazakhstan: Power and Ethnicity, 1920s–1930s]. Moscow, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. 480 p.
Chilikova, E. A. (1995). Stiraya arkhivnuyu pyl’. Orenburg – Kzul-Orda – Almaty [Erasing Archival Dust. Orenburg – Kzyl-Orda – Almaty]. In Mysl’. No. 10, pp. 85–91.
Chilikova, E. V. (2005). Osobennosti byta partiinykh rukovoditelei Kazakhstana v 20–30-e gg. ХХ stoletiya [Features of the Life of Kazakhstan Party Leaders in the 1920s–1930s]. In Politicheskaya istoriya Kazakhstana: pervaya polovina ХХ veka. Almaty, Arkhiv Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan, pp. 80–90.
Chilikova, E. V. (2013). Obraz yuzhnoi stolitsy Kazakhstana v vospominaniyakh ee zhitelei [The Image of the Southern Capital of Kazakhstan in the Memories of Its Residents]. In Rol’ arkhiva v sovremennom obshchestve. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Almaty, S. n., pp. 215–223.
GARF [State Archive of the Russian Federation]. Stock 1235. List 94. Dos. 582; List 125. Dos. 25.
Gatagova, L. S., Kosheleva, L. P., Rogovaya, L. A. (Eds.). (2005). TsK RKP(b) – VKP(b) i natsional’nyi vopros v 2 kn. [The Central Committee of the RCP(b) – the CPSU(b) and the National Question. 2 Books]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. Book 1. 1918–1933 gg. 785 p.
Ivanov, Vs. (2012). Tainoe tainykh [The Secret of Secrets]. Moscow, Nauka. 566 p.
Izvestiya-Kazakhstan [Izvestiya-Kazakhstan]. (2004). Almaty. August 21.
K IV s’’ezdu RKP(b). 1. Ot XIII к XIV s’’ezdu (k organizatsionnomu otchetu). 2. Otchety otdelov TsK RKP(b) [For the 4th Congress of the RCP(b). 1. From the 13th to the 14th Congress (for the Organisational Report). 2. Reports of Departments of the Central Committee of the RCP(b)]. (1925). Moscow, Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo. 227 p.
Kak Alma-Ata stala stolitsei [How Alma-Ata Became the Capital]. (N. d.). In Ocherki istorii Almaty. URL: http://vernoye-almaty.kz/others/stol.shtml (accessed: 12.11.2019).
Komsomol’skaya pravda Kazakhstan [Komsomolskaya Pravda Kazakhstan]. (2004). May 29 – June 5, August 21.
Kosach, G. G. (2002). “Gosudarstvennyi” gorod i natsional’nye avtonomii. Orenburg v pervye sovetskie gody [A “State” City and National Autonomies. Orenburg in the First Soviet Years]. In Vestnik Evrazii. No. 2, pp. 100–135.
KPSS i Sovetskoe pravitel’stvo o Kazakhstane. 1917–1977 gg. Sbornik dokumentov i materialov [The CPSU and the Soviet Government about Kazakhstan. 1917–1977. Collection of Documents and Materials]. (1978). Аlma-Ata, Kazakhstan. 394 p.
Lyubichankovskiy, S. V., Akanov, K. G. (2018). Orenburg v istorii integratsii Kazakhskoi stepi v sostav Rossiiskoi imperii. XVIII – nachalo XX v. [Orenburg in the History of the Integration of Kazakh Steppe in the Russian Empire]. In Bylye Gody. Rossiiskii istoricheskii zhurnal. No. 48 (2), pp. 484–495. DOI 10.13187/bg.2018.2.484.
Razgon, N. I. (2003). K voprosu o razmezhevanii Altaiskoi gubernii i Kazakhstana [On the Issue of Dividing the Altai Province and Kazakhstan]. In Moiseev, V. A. (Ed.). Tsentral’naya Aziya i Sibir’. Pervye nauchnye chteniya pamyati E. M. Zalkinda. 14 mya 2003 g. Barnaul, Azbuka, pp. 210–218.
RGASPI [Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History]. Stock 17. List 3. Dos. 679; List 21. Dos. 1290; List 25. Dos. 6; List 31. Dos. 24; List 67. Dos. 82, 85; List 68. Dos. 188; List 84. Dos. 683, 721, 739, 952; List 86. Dos. 24; List 112. Dos. 566, 645, 651, 668, 674, 684, 700, 714; List 163. Dos. 395, 430, 455, 457, 466, 474, 483, 484, 511, 739; List 171. Dos. 365.
Vekhi konsolidatsii. Iz opyta partiihykh organizatsii Kazakhstana v reshenii natsiional’nogo voprosa v 1917–1927 gg. (K 70-letiyu Kompartii Kazakhstana). Sbornik dokumentov [Milestones of Consolidation. From the Experience of Party Organisations in Kazakhstan in Solving the National Question in 1917–1927. (For the 70th Anniversary of the Communist Party of Kazakhstan). Collection of Documents]. Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan. 232 p.
Zhalmagambetov, E. A. (2013). Iz istorii stroitel’stva stolitsy Kazakhstana goroda Kyzylordy: pervyi oput i khod stroitel’stva [From the History of the Construction of the Capital of Kazakhstan, the City of Kyzylorda: The First Experience and Progress in Construction]. In Vestnik Kazakhskogo natsional’nogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. No. 2 (37), pp. 173–180.
