Contemporary Russian Literature in Reading Anthologies (1843–1904) and the Literary Canon
This article studies the quantitative and qualitative status and cultural functions of modern literature in 46 Russian reading anthologies designed for two major types of high schools (“gymnasia” and “nonclassical secondary schools”) from 1843 to 1904. Such analysis is relevant due to an outdated understanding of the importance of Minister Dmitrii Tolstoy’s conservative reforms between the 1870s and 1880s. Using genealogical, institutional, and historical and functional methods to study the history of education, the author explores the function and consequences of both the exclusion of modern literature from the school curriculum and its presence in some readers. As a result, curriculum classicisation after the 1871 reform and the preservation of the literary curriculum were less unambiguous than was considered previously. The ban on the study of literature written after 1842 and the concurrent significant expansion of texts from Old Russian literature led to a paradoxical and unpredictable sacralisation of the “Russian classics” and discredited many important texts in the eyes of the younger generation. The article demonstrates that in such a situation, educational readers played an important role, being a buffer zone between a strictly limited curriculum and modern literature that was prohibited in class. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the content of the readers demonstrates that from 1860 to 1900, the share of texts by contemporary authors (i. e. those published 20–30 years before the publication of a reading book) increased from 4 to 35 %. Similarly, starting with 1861, the number of new readers on the educational market increased significantly. Qualitative analysis allows the author to identify the writers whose works were most frequently included in textbooks between the 1860s and 1890s. By the beginning of the 1900s, many fragments of frequently reproduced texts became canonical, were memorized, and, although they could not give a complete picture of the whole text, performed an important cultural function, attracting teenagers to modern texts and often still living authors. As a buffer zone between the official curriculum, the school historical and literary narrative, and the current literary process, readers thus made an important contribution to the canonisation of modern literature in Russian society in the 19th century, even in spite of the ministerial ban on its study.
Baza dannykh po russkim khrestomatiyam i knigam dlya chteniya [Database of Russian Readers]. In Russkii literaturnyi kanon. Materialy i tablitsy [website]. URL: http://ruthenia.ru/canon/ (mode of access: 02.06.2019).
Georgievskii, A. I. (1902). K istorii Uchenogo komiteta Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya [On the History of the Scientific Committee of the Ministry of Public Education]. St Petersburg, Senatskaya tipografiya. 202 p.
Guillory, J. (1993). Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press. 408 p.
Guiney, M. M. (2004). Teaching the Cult of Literature in the French Third Republic. N. Y., Palgrave Macmillan. 268 p.
Hunter, I. (1988). Culture and Government. The Emergence of Literary Education. L., Palgrave Macmillan. 317 p.
Kermode, F. (1971). Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne. L., Routledge, Kegan Paul. 316 p.
Korte, B. (2000). Flowers for the Picking: Anthologies of Poetry in (British) Literary and Cultural Studies. In Korte, B., Schneider, R., Lethbridge, S. (Eds.). Anthologies of British Poetry: Critical Perspectives from Literary and Cultural Studies. Amsterdam, Rodopi, pp. 1–32.
Kovalevskaya, S. V. (1974). Vospominaniya. Povesti [Memoirs. Stories]. Moscow, Leningrad, Nauka. 559 p.
Lyubzhin, A. I. (2014–2017). Istoriya russkoi shkoly v 2 t. [A History of Russian School. 2 Vols.]. Moscow, Nikeya. Vol. 2. Book 2. 948 p. Book 3. 955 p.
Mole, T. (2017). What the Victorians Made of Romanticism. Material Artefacts, Cultural Practices, and Reception History. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press. 317 p.
Nemirovich-Danchenko, V. I. (1893). Slastenovskie milliony [Slastenov’s Millions]. Moscow, Tipografiya I. D. Sytina. 319 p.
Petrov, K. (1862). Prakticheskii vzglyad na programmu russkogo yazyka i slovesnosti [A Practical View of the Russian Language and Literature Curriculum]. In Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya. Vol. 113. No. 2. Section 1, pp. 168–190.
Poety “Iskry” v 2 t. [Poets of Iskra. 2 Vols.]. (1987). Leningrad, Sovetskii pisatel'. Vol. 1. 383 p.
Shvarts, E. L. (1982). Memuary [Memoirs]. Paris, La Presse Libre. 248 p.
Sinel, A. (1973). The Classroom and the Chancellery: State Educational Reform in Russia under Count Dmitry Tolstoi. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Univ. Press. 358 p.
Staferova, E. L. (2007). A. V. Golovnin i liberal'nye reformy v prosveshchenii (pervaya polovina 1860-kh godov) [A. V. Golovnin and the Liberal Reforms in Education (First Half of the 1860s)]. Moscow, Kanon+. 512 p.
Uchebnye plany i primernye programmy predmetov, prepodavaemykh v muzhskikh gimnaziyakh i progimnaziyakh Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya [Curricula and Provisional Syllabi of Courses Delivered in High Schools of the Ministry of Public Education]. (1890). St Petersburg, Tipografiya Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk. 208 p.
Uchebnye plany predmetov, prepodavaemykh v muzhskikh gimnaziyakh Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya [Curricula of High Schools of the Ministry of Public Education]. (1872). In Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya. Vol. 162. No. 7, pp. 35–161.
Vdovin, A. (2013). Prilozhenie 1. Spisok khrestomatii i knig dlya chteniya, izdannykh na territorii Rossiiskoi imperii i voshedshikh v bazu dannykh “Russkaya literatura v shkole (1805–1912)” [Appendix 1. A List of Readers Published in the Russian Empire and Included in the Database “Russian Literature at School (1805–1912)”]. In Vdovin, A., Leibov, R. (Eds). Acta Slavica Estonica IV. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Literaturovedenie, IX. Khrestomatiinye teksty: russkaya pedagogicheskaya praktika XIX v. i poeticheskii kanon. Tartu, Tartuskii universitet, pp. 302–309.
Vdovin, A. (2017). “Dmitry Tolstoy's Classicism” and the Formation of the Russian Literary Canon in the High School Curriculum. In Ab Imperio. No. 4, pp. 108–137. DOI 10.1353/imp.2017.0078.
Vdovin, A., Leibov, R. (2013). Khrestomatiinye teksty: russkaya poeziya i shkol'naya praktika XIX stoletiya [Anthologised Texts: Russian Poetry and School Practices of the 19th Century]. In Vdovin, A., Leibov, R. (Eds). Acta Slavica Estonica IV. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Literaturovedenie, IX. Khrestomatiinye teksty: russkaya pedagogicheskaya praktika XIX v. i poeticheskii kanon. Tartu, Tartuskii universitet, pp. 7–34.
Zhitomirova, N. N. (1976). Chitatel'skie zaprosy i krug chteniya uchashchikhsya srednei shkoly predrevolyutsionnoi Rossii XIX i nachala XX veka [Reading Inquiries and Circle of Reading of Russian Pupils in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries]. In Istoriya russkogo chitatelya. Leningrad, Leningradskii gosudarstvennyi institut kul'tury. Iss. 2, pp. 67–82.