Justice across Distances: The Unsuccessful Practice of Magistrates in Prerevolutionary Siberia


  • Evgeny Krestyannikov




Siberia in the late 19th – early 20th century; magistrates’ court; judicial duties; communication lines; transport.


The late nineteenth century was marked by a judicial reform in Siberia which established magistrates’ courts: this signified that the judicial system was being adapted to the political regime and space of the country. To make justice more widely available to the population, Siberian magistrates were entrusted responsibilities which they did not have in European Russia. Additionally, they had to conduct site visits to hold court hearings and investigate crimes. The author uses a cross-disciplinary approach and comparative techniques, paying close attention to daily occurrences and micro-historical details while referring to documents of diverse origin: this helps us fully consider the efficiency of the judicial system with regard to magistrates’ courts and the trips judges had to make. It becomes clear that employees responsible for the delimitation of sites did not manage to find an optimal way to do this that suited all the requirements and circumstances. In many cases, magistrates had to travel long distances and their trips were troublesome, taking up lots of working hours while also being, on occasion, absolutely unproductive; they had to use different kinds of local transport and communication lines depending on the weather and the season. This form of work led to an increase in red tape and affected the qualifications of the staff, making them treat their work irresponsibly and undermining their moral principles. Trips made by officials did not bring the court closer to the population, which resulted in a lack of attention to the population from the judicial authorities. The latter, in their turn, lacked in human and material resources and did not have an opportunity to change the situation. The heads of regional judicial institutions saw the harmful effect the magistrates’ multifunctionality and trips had on justice but could not do anything. The situation started to change after the resignation of N. V. Muravyov, Minister of Justice, who supported the combination of judicial and investigation duties by the magistrates. Overall, the territorial mobility of judicial organs proved utterly ineffective and did not make magistrates’ courts more available to the population, thus reducing their productivity. This led to several negative repercussions for the judicial system.

Author Biography

Evgeny Krestyannikov

Dr. Hab. (History), Head of Laboratory of Historical and Ecological Anthropology, Tyumen State University.

6, Volodarsky Str., 625003, Tyumen, Russia.



A. Kh. (1911). Mirovoi sud’ya v Sibiri [Magistrates in Siberia]. In Sibirskie voprosy. No. 5/6, pp. 38–45.

Anuchin, V. N. (1909). Pasynki Femidy [Themis’ Stepchildren]. In Sibirskie voprosy. No. 46/47, pp. 26–39; No. 49/50, pp. 26–39; No. 51/52, pp. 54–71.

Baberowski, J. (1996). Autokratie und Justiz. Zum Verhältnis von Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Rückständigkeit im Ausgehenden Zarenreich 1864–1914. Frankfurt a/M, Vittorio Klostermann. 846 S.

GAIO [State Archive of Irkutsk Region]. Stock 243. List 1. Dos. 14; Stock 245. List 1. Dos. 8, 10, 24, 27, 924; Stock 246. List 6. Dos. 3; List 9. Dos. 1.

GAOO [State Archive of Omsk Region]. Stock 25. List 1. Dos. 6, 233, 321.

GAT [State Archive of Tobolsk]. Stock 152. List 37. Dos. 861, 869, 875, 904; Stock 158. List 2. Dos. 31, 155, 227; Stock 479. List 2. Dos. 74.

GATO [State Archive of Tomsk Region]. Stock 3. List 6. Dos. 5; List 14. Dos. 109; Stock 10. List 1. Dos. 63, 67, 73, 133, 134, 162, 183.

Gessen, I. V. (1905). Sudebnaya reforma [Judicial Reform]. St Petersburg, Tipolitografiya F. Vaisberga i P. Gershunina. 267 p.

Krestyannikov, E. A. (2008). Sud prisyazhnykh v dorevolyutsionnoi Sibiri [The Jury Court in Prerevolutionary Siberia]. In Otechestvennaya istoriya. No. 4, pp. 37–47.

Krestyannikov, E. A. (2013). Politsiya i politseiskoe sledstvie v Zapadnoi Sibiri (1822–1897 gg.) [Police and Police Investigation in Western Siberia, 1822–1897]. In Rossiiskaya istoriya. No. 3, pp. 84–99.

Krestyannikov, E. A. (2015). Pomeshcheniya sudebnykh uchrezhdenii Zapadnoi Sibiri v XIX – nachale XX v. [Facilities of Judicial Establishments of Western Siberia in the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. In Voprosy istorii. No. 10, pp. 58–70.

Krestyannikov, E. A. (2016). Stsenarii vvedeniya mirovogo suda v dorevolyutsionnoi Sibiri [Ways of Establishing Magistrates’ Courts in Prerevolutionary Siberia]. In Voprosy istorii. No 9, pp. 3–20.

Krestyannikov, E. A. (2018). Finansovye aspekty sudebnoi reformy v Sibiri (konets XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Judicial Reform in Siberia: Financial Aspects (Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries)]. In Rossiiskaya istoriya. No. 2, pp. 22–34.

Kvitka, M. (1900). Po rekam Zapadnoi Sibiri (Iz vpechatlenii poverkhnostnogo turista) [Along the Rivers of Western Siberia (From the Impressions of a Superficial Tourist)]. In Dorozhnik po Sibiri i Aziatskoi Rossii. No. 2, pp. 33–40.

Macey, D. A. J. (1989). The Land Captains : A Note on Their Social Composition, 1889–1913. In Russian History. Vol. 16. No. 2/4, pp. 327–351.

Otchet po deloproizvodstvu Gosudarstvennogo soveta za sessiyu 1895–1896 gg. [Report on the Office of State Council for the Session of 1895–1896]. (1896). St Petersburg, Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya. 825 p.

Pearson, T. S. (1981). The Origins of Alexander III’s Land Captains : A Reinterpretation. In Slavic Review. Vol. 40. No. 3, pp. 384–403.

Plotnikov, M. (1898). Khronika vnutrennei zhizni [A Chronicle of Inner Life]. In Russkoe bogatstvo. No. 8, pp. 165–170.

Popova, A. D., Lonskaya, S. V. (Eds.). (2016). Mirovaya yustitsiya v Rossii : sozdanie, deyatel’nost’, istoricheskaya missiya [World Justice in Russia : Creation, Activity, Historical Mission]. Moscow, Prospekt. 288 p.

Proshchanie stats-sekretarya N. V. Murav’eva s chinami Ministerstva yustitsii [State Secretary N. V. Muravyov’s Farewell to the Officials of the Ministry of Justice]. (1905). In Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii. No. 2, pp. 77–92.

PSZ [The Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Sobranie tret’e. Vol. 16. № 12932; Vol. 31. № 35330.

Rechi sibirskikh deputatov v Gosudarstvennoi dume [Speeches of Siberian Deputies in the State Duma]. (1909). In Sibirskie voprosy. No. 45, pp. 44–47.

RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 1405. List 542. Dos. 250, 254.

Sbornik statisticheskikh svedenii Ministerstva yustitsii za 1909 g. [Collection of Statistical Information of the Ministry of Justice for 1909]. (1911). Iss. 25. St Petersburg, Senatskaya tipografiya. 396 p.

Sbornik statisticheskikh svedenii Ministerstva yustitsii za 1910 g. [Collection of Statistical Information of the Ministry of Justice for 1910]. (1911). Iss. 26. St Petersburg, Senatskaya tipografiya. 396 p.

Sibirskaya khronika [Siberian Chronicle]. (1897). In Vostochnoe obozrenie. July 23.

Taranovski, T. (1981). The Aborted Counter-Reform: Murav’ev Commission and the Judicial Statutes of 1864. In Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. Vol. 29. No. 2, pp. 161–184.



How to Cite

Krestyannikov, E. (2019). Justice across Distances: The Unsuccessful Practice of Magistrates in Prerevolutionary Siberia. Quaestio Rossica, 7(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2019.1.365



Problema voluminis