On the Path to Reform: The State Peasant Question in the Secret Committees of Nicholas I

  • Tatiana Andreeva
Keywords: state peasantry; governmental policy; secret committees of 1826, 1828, 1835; Nicholas I; M. M. Speransky; P. D. Kiselev; E. F. Kankrin; A. B. Kurakin


This article considers the background of state peasant reform, its ideological sources, and practical outcome. The Great Reforms are not described as a single act but as a long process reflecting the complex character of Russian modernisation. With reference to previously unstudied documents, both official and private, the author analyses Nicholas I’s policy regarding the peasant question. It was based on the principle of gradual social change and the rejection of a single abrupt abolition of serfdom. It also focused on laying the foundations for future emancipation. The committees of 6 December 1826 and 1828 maintained the idea of a complex reform based on transforming the management of state peasants through a gradual and controlled change of their status. The committee of 1835 also drafted a programme of changes in state-owned villages. The author regards the reform of state peasants as a comprehensive process reflecting the progressive character of the social and economic development of Russia: it was aimed at rationalising income-generating systems of land management and use, taxation, and the administration of state-owned villages. Despite the differences between the drafts worked out by the secret committees of 1826, 1828, and 1835, they can be characterised by certain similarities, i. e. their strategic aims (the strengthening of the Russian state). Thus, they included the development of the legal status of state peasants and state control of all the spheres of their lives. The article pays close attention to the model of the two-pronged reform formulated by M. M. Speransky and perfected by P. D. Kiselev. Although the methods proposed to solve the peasant question did not rely on the peasant population, they were aimed at eliminating the extreme features of serfdom, thus illustrating the desire of the autocratic government to nurture bourgeois social relations. The official reform of the agrarian sphere of the second half of the 1820s and the early 1830s was characterised by its consecutive incremental nature and the modernisation of the social structure and state management at the central and local levels.

Author Biography

Tatiana Andreeva

Dr. Hab. (History), Leading Researcher, St Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

7, Petrozavodskaya Str., 197110, St Petersburg, Russia.



Druzhinin, N. M. (1946). Gosudarstvennye krest’yane i reforma P. D. Kiseleva v 2 t. [The State Peasants and P. D. Kiselev’s Reform. 2 Vols.]. Moscow, Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. Vol. 1. 631 p.

Dunaeva, N. V. (2010). Mezhdu soslovnoi i grazhdanskoi svobodoi: evolyutsiya pravosub’’ektnosti svobodnykh sel’skikh obyvatelei Rossiiskoi imperii v XIX v. [Between Class and Civil Freedom: The Evolution of the Legal Personality of Free Rural Inhabitants of the Russian Empire in the 19th Century]. St Petersburg, Severo-Zapadnaya akademiya gosudarstvennoi sluzhby. 471 p.

Ezhegodnye otchety III Otdeleniya i Korpusa zhandarmov. 1827–1830 gg. [Annual Reports of the Third Branch and Corps of Gendarmes. 1827–1830]. (1929). In Krasnyi arkhiv. Vol. 6 (37), pp. 143–157.

Iz istorii raskreposhcheniya pomeshchich’ikh krest’yan: pokazaniya A. E. Timasheva [From the History of the Emancipation of Estate Peasants: The Testimony of A. E. Timashev]. (1887). In Russkii arkhiv. Vol. 6, pp. 259–262.

Khristoforov, I. A. (2011). Sud’ba reformy: Russkoe krest’yanstvo v pravitel’stvennoi politike do i posle otmeny krepostnogo prava (1830–1890-e gg.). [The Fate of Reform: The Russian Peasantry in tGovernmental Policy before and after the Abolition of Serfdom (1830–1890)]. Moscow, Sobranie. 367 p.

NI Arkhiv SPbII RAN [Scientific-historical Archive of the St Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Stock 115 (Kollektsiya rukopisnykh knig). List 1. Dos. 51, 211a, 211v.

Nikolaenko, P. D. (2009). Knyaz’ V. P. Kochubei – pervyi ministr vnutrennikh del Rossii [Prince V. P. Kochubei – First Minister of Internal Affairs of Russia]. St Petersburg, Evropeiskii Dom. 779 p.

OR RNB [Manuscript Section of the National Library of Russia]. Stock 731 (M. M. Speransky). List 1. Dos. 776.

PSZ [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Sobranie vtoroe. Vol. 1. № 423; Vol. 11. № 9119; Vol. 12. № 10834; Vol. 13. № 11189.

RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 651 (Vasil’chikovy). List 1. Dos. 253; Stock 958 (P. D. Kiselev). List 1. Dos. 646; Stock 1167 (Komitet 6 dekabrya 1826 goda). List 1. Dos. 44.

Ruzhitskaya, I. V. (2015). Zakonodatel’naya deyatel’nost’ v tsarstvovanie imperatora Nikolaya I [Legislative Activity in the Reign of Emperor Nicholas I]. 2 Ed. Moscow, St Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. 358 p.

Smirnova-Rosset, A. O. (1895). Zapiski: Iz zapisnykh knizhek 1826–1845 gg. [Notes: From the Notebooks of 1826–1845]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya M. Merkusheva. 341 p.

Speransky, M. M. (2010). Izbrannoe [Selected Works]. Moscow, Nauka. 510 p.

Zablotsky-Desyatovsky, A. P. (1882). Graf P. D. Kiselev i ego vremya v 4 t. [Count P. D. Kiselev and His Time. 4 Vols.]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha. Vol. 2. 355 p.

Zhurnaly zasedanii Komiteta 6 Dekabrya 1826 goda [Minutes of Committee Meetings as of December 6, 1826]. (1891). In Sbornik imperatorskogo russkogo istoricheskogo obshchestva. Vol. 74. St Petersburg, Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, pp. 1–487.

How to Cite
Andreeva, T. (2019). On the Path to Reform: The State Peasant Question in the Secret Committees of Nicholas I. Quaestio Rossica, 7(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2019.1.361
Problema voluminis