Odic Versions of the ‘Social Contract’ in 18th-century Russia


  • Tatyana Abramzon
  • Alexey Petrov




Social contract theory is one of the basic socio-political doctrines of the European and Russian Enlightenments. Various models of relationships between the authorities and society are reflected in the treatises of European and Russian enlighteners. However, the concept of the social contract is a constantly changing ideological construct, ‘a tacit agreement’ created, sought for, and pronounced in different cultural texts. The authors of the article mainly focus on the odic poetry of the 18th century, the sphere of Russian culture where the idea of a mutually beneficial agreement between a monarch and their subjects was most vividly, clearly, and comprehensively expressed. The article aims to identify the main stages in the history of development of the relationship between a monarch and their subjects as reflected in poetry. The ‘social contract’ paradigm was mostly formed during the reign of Peter the Great, when the ‘functions’ of a sovereign and his subjects were determined: a monarch took care of the commonweal and his subjects obeyed and served him. Some poets of the Petrine epoch (Karion Istomin, I. V. Paus, V. K. Trediakovsky) endorsed ideas of enlightening the Russ, the monarch’s duty to protect the faith and fatherland from foes, and subjects’ faithful service to their monarch. After Peter the Great’s death, the situation changed. The figure of the empress as an ideal ruler and an enlightened monarch who did everything possible to attain the ‘bliss’ of the Russ came to the fore in odes and verse inscriptions for fireworks and illuminations. The emotional motives of the ‘social contract’ were also modified: love was declared the driving force of the monarch and her subjects. Subjects should be willing to sacrifice themselves for the empress’s kindness and generosity. The paternal-filial model of the relationship between the authorities and citizens did not change into a maternal-filial one during Elizabeth’s reign. The names used to refer to the empress’s in odes names remained ‘Peter’s blood’ and ‘Peter’s daughter’. In the literary culture of the 1770s–1990s, subjects’ bliss was declared a necessary condition of the ruler’s bliss. That it was impossible to criticise the monarch provoked criticism from the nobles, who were unfamiliar with the common people’s needs and aspirations. By the end of the century, the genre of the solemn ode was in decline: it only returned to popularity during Paul I’s and Alexander I’s accessions to the throne. The beginning of the 1800s can be considered a borderline, after which illusions about the possibility of an ‘amicable agreement’ between a monarch and their subjects were destroyed.


Abramzon, T. E. (2010). “Pismo o polze Stekla” M. V. Lomonosova. Opyit kommentariya prosvetitelskoy entsiklopedii. Reprintnoe vosproizvedenie izdaniya 1752 [1753] goda: k 300-letiyu M. V. Lomonosova [A Letter about the Usefulness of Glass by M. V. Lomonosov. The Experience of Commenting an Enlightening Encyclopaedia. Reprint of the Original Copy of 1752 [1753]: Dedicated to M. V. Lomonosov’s 300th Birthday]. 192 p. Moscow, OGI.
Abramzon, T. E. (2006). Poeticheskie mifologii XVIII veka (Lomonosov. Sumarokov. Heraskov. Derzhavin) [Poetic Mythologies of the 18th Century (Lomonosov. Sumarokov. Kheraskov. Derzhavin)]. 480 p. Magnitogorsk, MaSU.
Atger, F. (1906). Essai sur l’histoire des doctrines du contrat social. 100 p. Paris. Bogdanov, A. P. (2012). Stih torzhestva : rozhdenie russkoj ody, poslednjaja chetvert’ XVII – nachalo XVIII veka : [v 2 ch.] [A Poem of Celebration : The Birth of the Russian Ode, the Last Quarter of the 17th – Early 18th Centuries, 2 Vols.]. 676 p. Moscow, Inst. of Russian History Russian Academy of Sciences.
Buranok, O. M. (2005). Russkaja literatura XVIII veka. Petrovskaja jepoha. Feofan Prokopovich : ucheb. posobie [Russian Literature of the 18th Century. The Reign of Peter the Great. Theophan Prokopovich : Teaching Aid]. 464 p. Moscow, Flinta, Science.
Cracraft, J. (1973). Feofan Prokopovich. In Garrard. L. G. (Ed.) The Eighteenth Century in Russia. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 75–105.
Deborin, A. M. (1958). Sotsialno-politicheskie ucheniya novogo i noveyshego vremeni. V 3-h t. [Socio-political Doctrines of the New and Newest Times. 3 Vols.]. Vol. 1. 628 p. Moscow, Izdatelstvo AN SSSR.
Derzhavin, G. R. (1864–1883). Sochineniya Derzhavina: v 9 t. / s ob’yasn. primech. [i predisl.] Ya. Grota [Works of Derzhavin: 9 Vols. / with Explanations and Comments [and a Preface] by J. Grot.]. Vol. 1. 872 p. Vol. 2. Vol. 3. 808p. St Petersburg, Izdatelstvo Imperat. akad. Nauk, v tip. Imperat. akad. nauk.
Domanov, V. G. (2010). Politologiya. Slovar [Political Science. A Dictionary]. 375 p. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet.
Gough, J. W. (1936). The Social Contract. A Critical Study of Its Development. 172 p. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press.
Heraskov, M. M. (1858). Oda Gosudaryu Aleksandru Pavlovichu Samoderzhtsu vserossiyskomu na vseradostnoe Ego na prestol vstuplenie [An Ode to Monarch Alexander Pavlovich All-Russian Sovereign for His Joyful Accession to the Throne]. In Bibliograficheskie zapiski. Iss. 9, pp. 288–289.
Karamzin, N. M. (1966). Polnoye sobraniye stihotvoreniy [Complete Poems]. 419 p. Leningrad, Sovetskiy pisatel’.
Lomonosov, M. V. (1959). Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy v 10 t. [Complete Works, 10 vols.]. Vol. VIII. 1280 p. Moscow; Leningrad, Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Longinov, M. N. (1858). Oda Aleksandru I na vstuplenie tsarstvovat [An Ode to Alexander I for His Accession to the Throne]. In Bibliograficheskie zapiski Vol. 1, pp. 288–289.
Lotman, Yu. M. (2004). O roli tipologicheskih simvolov v istorii kulturyi [On the Role of Typological Symbols in the History of Culture]. In Lotman J. M. Semiosphere. St Petersburg, Iskusstvo – SPB, pp. 371‒385.
Maykov, V. (1809). Stihi na vozvratnoe pribyitie Ee Velichestva iz Kazani v prestolnyiy grad Moskvu iyunya 14 dnya 1767 goda [Verses for Her Majesty’s Coming Back from Kazan to the Capital City of Moscow on the 14th of June in 1767]. In Maykov V. Works. St Petersburg, Pechatano pri I kadet. korpuse, 1809, pp. 254–257.
Momdzhyan, H. N. (1983). Frantsuzskoe Prosveschenie XVIII veka; Ocherki. [The 18th Century French Enlightenment; Sketches]. 447 p. Moscow, Myisl.
Perets, V. N. (1902). Istoriko-literaturnye issledovanija i materialy. Tom III. Iz istorii razvitija russkoj pojezii XVIII v. [Historical and Literary Research and Materials. Vol. III. From the History of Development of 18th Century Russian Poetry]. 633 p. St Petersburg, Tipografija F. Vajsberga i P. Gershunina.
Petrov, A. V. (2011). Mifopoliticheskie formuly v manifestah i odah 1741–1742 gg. (“mifologija vlasti” v politicheskoj i literaturnoj kul’turah v Rossii XVIII veka) [Mythical and Political Formulae in Manifestos and Odes in 1741–1742 (“Mythology of Power” in Political and Literary Cultures in 18th Century Russia)]. In Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury. Vol. 1, pp. 152–161.
Petrov, A. V. (2009). Novogodnjaja pojezija v Rossii : ot Trediakovskogo do Benediktova Monografija [New Year Poetry in Russia: From Trediakovsky to Benediktov. A Monograph]. 267 p. Magnitogorsk, MaSU.
PSZRI (1830). [A Complete Set of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Vol. 4. 892 p.; Vol. 11. 991 p.; Vol. 26. 882 p. St Petersburg, pechatano v Tipografii II otdeleniya sobstvennoy ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva.
Pospelova, M. (1801). Oda na vseradostnyiy den koronovaniya Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva, Gosudarya Imperatora Aleksandra Pavlovicha [An Ode for a Joyful Day of Crowning His Royal Majesty, Monarch Emperor Alexander Pavlovich]. 9 p. Moscow.
Prikazchikova, E. E. (2009). Kulturnyie mifyi v russkoy literature XVIII – nachala XIX veka [Cultural Myths in Russian Literature in the 18th – Early 19th Centuries]. 526 p. Yekaterinburg, Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta, 2009.
Radishchev, A. N. (1941). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy v 3 t. [Complete Works, 3 Vols.]. Vol. 2. 429 p. Moscow, Leningrad, Izdatelstvo AN SSSR.
Rudakova, S. V. (2012). Filosofiya schastya v lirike E. A. Boratyinskogo [The Philosophy of Happiness in E. A. Boratynsky Lyrics]. In Izvestiya Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Gumanitarnyie nauki. 2012. Vol. 108, Iss. 4, pp. 103–114.
Shcherbatov, M. M. (1935). Neizdannyie sochineniya [Unpublished Works]. 213 p. Moscow, Sotcegiz.
Serman, I. Z. (1962). Trediakovskij i prosvetitel’stvo (1730-e gody) [Trediakovsky and the Enlightenment (in the 1730s)]. In XVIII vek. Sbornik 5. Moscow, Leningrad, Izdatelstvo AN SSSR, pp. 205–222.
Shubinskiy, S. N. (1911). Prazdnovanie Nishtadtskogo mira v Peterburge. 22 oktyabrya 1721 [The Celebration of the Peace Treaty of Nystad in Petersburg on October 22, 1721]. In Shubinskiy S. N. (Ed.). Istoricheskie ocherki i rasskazyi, 6-e izd. St Petersburg, Tipographiya A. S. Suvorina, pp. 43–51.
Slovar akademii rossiyskoy v 6 ch. (1789–1794). [The Dictionary of the Russian Academy, 6 parts]. Vol. 1. 636 p. Vol. 6. 600 p. St Petersburg, pri Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk.
Stupperich, R. (1967). Feofan Procopovic in der neueren Literatur. In Brang, P., Brauer, H. (Eds.) Festschrift fur Margarete Woltnerzum 70. Geburtstag, Heidelberg, pp. 284–293.
Tetzner, J. (1958). Thepphan Prokopovic und die russische Fruhaufklarung. In Zeitschrift fiir Slawistik. Bd. 3, pp. 351–368.
Turgenev, An. (1992). Rechi Andreya Turgeneva [Speeches of Andrei Turgenev]. In Kitidziro Yamada (Ed.). Acta Slavica Iaponica, 10, pp. 167–181. URL: http://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/8047/1/KJ00000034000.pdf (mode of access: 28.04.2017).
Wortman, R. S. (2002). Stsenarii vlasti. Mifyi i tseremonii russkoy monarhii ot Petra Velikogo do smerti Nikolaya I. [Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy from Peter the Great to the Death of Nicholas I]. 597 p. Moscow, OGI.
Vinter, E. (1966). Feofan Prokopovich i nachalo russkogo prosvescheniya [Feofan Prokopovich and the Beginning of Russian Enlightenment]. In XVIII vek. Vol. 7. Moscow, Nauka, pp. 43–46.
Volgin, V. P. (1958). Razvitie obschestvennoy myisli vo Frantsii v XVIII v. [The Development of Public Thought in France in the 18th Century]. 202 p. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Zaytseva, T. B., Petrov A. V. (2015). Gendernaya i mifopoliticheskaya simvolika obraza imperatritsyi v odopisi XVIII veka [Gender Mythical and Political Symbolism of the Empress’s Image in 18th Century Odes]. In Novoe slovo v nauke: perspektivyi razvitiya. Iss. 4 (6), pp. 193–194.
Zhivov, V. M. (2002). Istoriya russkogo prava kak ligvosemioticheskaya problema [The History of the Russian Law as a Linguo-semiotic Issue]. In Zhivov V. M. Razyiskaniya v oblasti istorii i predyistorii russkoy kulturyi. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury, pp. 187–306.



How to Cite

Abramzon, T., & Petrov, A. (2017). Odic Versions of the ‘Social Contract’ in 18th-century Russia. Quaestio Rossica, 5(2), 406–425. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2017.2.233



Problema voluminis