Oral History of the "Temple of Science": A Collection of Interviews and Reminiscences of the Staff of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2024.2.905Keywords:
Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, oral history, interviews, history of science, Soviet historiographyAbstract
This article analyses You are going to the temple of science… (Moscow, 2021), a collection of interviews and memoirs by employees of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The collection was compiled by V. N. Kruglov, V. V. Tikhonov, and Yu. S. Filina. The author considers the heuristic potential of these texts and the peculiarities of their use in historiographical studies. The interviews are important for the historian of science for two reasons: they provide them with important details of the everyday academic life of the institution (the so-called “historiographical life”), which are difficult or impossible to obtain from other types of documents, and they help to clarify the details found in the office records. The interviews and memoirs of historians in this collection allow the historiographer to get acquainted with the process of a young Soviet historian’s entry into a scholarly corporation, to characterise the peculiarities of relations between members of the latter, to show the nature of production processes in Soviet humanities research institutes, to report on the peculiarities of the management of scientific institutes, etc. It is pointed out that the information in these texts should be treated with caution, that they are characterised by a certain subjectivity and reflect the mentality of researchers belonging to the late Soviet generation.
References
Anikeev, A. A., Bobkova, M. S. (Eds.). (2009). Istoriki Rossii. Kto est’ kto v izuchenii zarubezhnoi istorii. Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [Russian Historians. Who is Who in the Study of Foreign History. Biobibliographical Dictionary]. 2nd Ed. Moscow, S. n. 339 p.
Asinovskaya, S. A. (1955). Iz istorii peredovykh idei v russkoi medievistike (T. N. Granovskii) [From the History of Advanced Ideas in Russian Medieval Studies (T. N. Granovsky)]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. 166 р.
Chernobaev, A. A. (Ed.). (2016–2017). Istoriki Rossii kontsa XIX – nachala XXI veka. Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ v 3 t. [Russian Historians of the Late 19th – Early 21st Centuries. Bibliographic Dictionary. 3 Vols.]. Moscow, Sobranie.
Dolgova, E. A. (2020). Rozhdenie sovetskoi nauki: uchenye v 1920–1930‑e gg. [The Birth of Soviet Science: Scientists in the 1920s–1930s]. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet. 469 p.
Grishina, N. V. (2018). “…vozmozhnost’ proekhat’sya i podyshat’ zapadnoevropeiskim vozdukhom”: vzaimootnosheniya nauki i vlasti v sfere zagranichnykh komandirovok v 1920‑e gg. [“…the opportunity to ride and breathe the Western European air”: The Relationship of Science and the Authorities in the Field of Foreign Business Trips in the 1920s]. In Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. No. 51, pp. 28–36. DOI 10.17223/19988613/51/4.
Guseinov, A. A. (Ed.). (2009). Nash filosofskii dom: k 80‑letiyu Instituta filosofii RAN [Our Philosophical House: The 80th Anniversary of the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow, Progress-traditsiya. 524 p.
Ivanova, T. N., Vyazova, O. G., Lipatova, I. A. (2016). Pamyat’ universitetskoi korporatsii: problemy sokhraneniya i analiza [Memory of the University Corporation: Issues of Preservation and Analysis]. In Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. No. 4, pp. 89–97.
Kiselev, M. A. (2022). “Nasha provintsial’naya zhizn’ imeet svoi tenevye storony…”: konflikt vokrug “novogo napravleniya” v Sverdlovske v perepiske V. Ya. Krivonogova i N. M. Druzhinina [“Our provincial life has its shadow sides…”: The Conflict Around the “New Trend” in Sverdlovsk in the Correspondence of V. Ya. Krivonogov and N. M. Druzhinin]. In Istoriya. Elektronnyi nauchno-obrazovatel’nyi zhurnal. Vol. 13. No 4 (144). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840020704–3–1/ (accessed: 30.05.2024). DOI 10.18254/S207987840020704-3.
Kovalev, M. V. (2020). Rossiisko-portugal’skie nauchnye svyazi na rubezhe XIX–XX vv. i Fransishku Afonsu Shavish (1857–1926) i otechestvennaya nauka [Russian-Portuguese Scientific Relations at the Turn of the 20th Century and Francisco Afonso Chaves (1857–1926) and Russian Science]. In Rossiya XXI. No. 6, pp. 10–29.
Kovalev, M. V., Gruzdinskaya, V. S. (2020). “Vse byli ochen’ vpechatleny druzhelyubiem, gostepriimstvom i entuziazmom sovetskikh uchenykh”: otchet predstavitelya “British Council” v SSSR Brendy Tripp o poezdke britanskoi delegatsii v Moskvu i Leningrad na prazdnovanie 220‑letnego yubileya Akademii nauk SSSR, iyul’ 1945 g. [“Everyone was very impressed by the friendliness, hospitality, and enthusiasm of the Soviet scientists”: The Report of Brenda Tripp, the Representative of the British Council in the USSR, on the Trip of the British Delegation to Moscow and Leningrad to Celebrate the 220th Anniversary of the USSR Academy of Sciences, July 1945]. In Istoricheskii arkhiv. No. 4, pp. 87–107.
Kruglov, V. N., Tikhonov, V. V., Filina, Yu. S. (Eds.). (2021). “Ty idesh’ v khram nauki…”: interv’yu i vospominaniya sotrudnikov Instituta rossiiskoi istorii RAN. K 85‑letiyu IRI RAN [“You are going to the temple of science…”: Interviews and Memoirs of the Staff of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The 85th Anniversary of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN. 480 p.
Makarov, N. A. (Ed.). (2019). Institut arkheologii RAN: 100 let istorii [The Institute of the Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences: 100 Years of History]. Moscow, Institut arkheologii RAN. 319 p.
Osadchenko, B. A. (2005). Poiski na granyakh marksistskoi paradigmy. „Novoe napravlenie”, ego osnovnye predstaviteli, teoretiko-metodologicheskie pozitsii [The Researches on the Edges of the Marxist Paradigm. “New Trend”, Its Main Researchers, Theoretical and Methodological Positions]. In Korzun, V. P. (Ed.). Ocherki istorii otechestvennoi istoricheskoi nauki XX veka. Omsk, Izdatel’stvo Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, pp. 562–575.
Petrov, Yu. A., Chernobaev, A. A. (Eds.). (2021). Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN 1936–2021 gg. Ocherk istorii. Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [The Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences 1936–2021. An Outline of History. Biobibliographic Dictionary]. Moscow, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN. 656 p.
Polikarpov, V. V. (1996). “Novoe napravlenie” 50–70‑kh gg.: poslednyaya diskussiya sovetskikh istorikov [“New Trend” of the 50s–70s: The Last Discussion of Soviet Historians]. In Afanas’ev, Yu. N. (Ed.). Sovetskaya istoriografiya. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, pp. 349–400.
Sakharov, A. N. (Ed.). (2016). Institut istorii Akademii nauk SSSR v dokumentakh i materialakh [Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in Documents and Materials]. Moscow, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN. Iss. 1. 317 p.
Sharova, A. V. (2020). Distsiplinirovannye uchenye: Institut istorii AN SSSR v 1939–1940 gg. [Disciplined Scientists: Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in 1939–1940]. In Dolgova, E. A. (Ed.). Sovetskaya gumanitaristika. Mechty i pragmatika v 1920–1950‑e gg. Sbornik statei. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, pp. 234–243.
Sveshnikov, A. V. (2017). Samoekspertiza sovetskogo universiteta epokhi pozdnego sotsializma [Self-Examination of a Soviet University of the Late Socialist Era]. In Neprikosnovennyi zapas. No. 3 (113), pp. 274–293.
Tikhonov, V. V. (2016). Ideologicheskie kampanii “pozdnego stalinizma” i sovetskaya istoricheskaya nauka (seredina 1940‑kh – 1953 g.) [The Ideological Campaigns of “Late Stalinism” and Soviet Historical Science (Mid‑1940s – 1953)]. Moscow, St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya. 424 p.
Uvarov, P. Yu. (2015). Mezhdu “ezhami” i “lisami”: zametki ob istorikakh [Between “Hedgehogs” and “Foxes”: Notes on Historians]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 280 p.
Zabolotnyi, E. B., Kamynin, V. D. (1996). K voprosu o meste “novogo napravleniya” v otechestvennoi istoriografii [On the Question of the Place of the “New Trend” in Russian Historiography]. In Problemy istorii Rossii: ot traditsionnogo k industrial’nomu obshhestvu. Yekaterinburg, Volot, pp. 112–115.
