An Uncompleted Machine-Building Giant in the Urals: Mobilisation Policy and Construction Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.4.857

Keywords:

history of industrialisation, Uralhimmash, economic planning, socialist city, urban planning, unrealised project

Abstract

This article examines the Ural Plant of Chemical Engineering in Sverdlovsk as an example of unfinished industrial construction through the command economy formation, industry management structure, and city-planning activities development in the USSR during the first five-year plans. The authors refer to sources kept in the GARF, RGAE, GASO, TsDOOSO, and the Uralhimmashzavod History Museum and periodicals. They characterise the scale of unfinished industrial construction in the Urals during the first five-year plans, which predetermined the geography of the evacuation and the direction of future industrial and city-building development of the regional centres. The article describes the circumstances behind the emergence of the Ural Plant of Chemical Engineering in the first five-year plan programme and its construction process. The authors single out three periods of the plant’s construction, which correspond to the waves of mobilisation of the project discourse: 1930–1933, 1934–1935, and 1938–1941. They explain the causes of failure by the late emergence of the Uralhimmashstroi project in the plan, which coincided with the economic crisis of the turn of the first five-year plans. These factors necessitated a situational prioritisation of construction projects and the concentration of resources on the most important ones to ensure the earliest possible launch. The design of the social city of the Ural Plant of Chemical Engineering is discussed in the context of the development of the master plan of Greater Sverdlovsk and the competition between the central (Leningrad branch of Standartgorproekt) and regional (Uralgiprogor Institute) design organisations. Despite the existence of preliminary designs for the social city and a general settlement scheme, the location and appearance of the residential area were determined by available financial resources and the existing transport infrastructure. Although the project was not realised, the Ural Plant of Chemical Engineering acquired a discursively real status, whose maintenance required real human, monetary, and managerial resources even when construction stopped. Noting the frequency of change of activity waves at the Ural Plant of Chemical Engineering in comparison with the unrealised infrastructure projects of the New and Modern times analysed in foreign literature, as well as public announcements of each new “revival” of construction and silence about its suspensions, the authors conclude that in the conditions of socialist industrialisation, unfinished construction had a high mobilisation value.

Author Biographies

Aleksandr Dumchikov

Junior Researcher, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin.

19, Mira Str., 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-3134-8849

adumcikov@gmail.com

Kseniya Pimenova

Junior Researcher, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin.

19, Mira Str., 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0003-0719-2466

pimenovaksenia3@gmail.com

References

Allen, R. (2013). Ot fermy k fabrike: novaya interpretatsiya sovetskoi promyshlennoi revolyutsii [Farm to Factory. A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 390 p.

Carse, A., Kneas, D. (2019). Unbuilt and Unfinished: The Temporalities of Infrastructure. In Environment and Society. Vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 9–28. DOI 10.3167/ares.2019.100102.

Da zdravstvuet sed’moi s”ezd! [Long Live the 7th Congress!]. (1934). In Za khimicheskuyu apparaturu. No. 1, p. 1.

Dollezhal’, N. A. (2010). U istokov rukotvornogo mira. Zapiski konstruktora [At the Origin of the Man-Made World. Designer’s Notes]. Moscow, Znanie. 254 p.

Ermilov, P. (1932). Na Khimmashstroe spetsialisty i rabochie brodyat v poiskakh raboty [At Khimmashstroi, Specialists and Workers Wander in Search of Work]. In Ural’skii rabochii. August 28. No. 194 (5139), p. 3.

Ezhegodnik obshchestva arkhitektorov i khudozhnikov. Al’bom [Yearbook of the Society of Architects and Artists. Album]. (1935). Iss. 14. 272 p.

Fel’dman, M. A. (2020). Stepen’ osmysleniya itogov pervoi pyatiletki na regional’nom urovne: ural’skoe izmerenie [Degree of Comprehension of the Results of the First Five-Year Plan at the Regional Level: The Ural Dimension]. In Voprosy teoreticheskoi ekonomiki. No. 3, pp. 157–167. DOI 10.24411/2587–7666–2020–10308.

GARF [State Archive of the Russian Federation]. Stock 5674. List 1. Dos. 43; Stock A10249. List 4. Dos. 2289; Stock A314. List 1. Dos. 7841, 7846, 7848, 8003; Stock A539. List 5. Dos. 5186.

Gavrilov, D. V. (2005). Nesostoyavshiisya gigant ural’skoi oboronnoi promyshlennosti (Bakalstroi, 1932–1942 gg.) [The Failed Giant of the Ural Defense Industry (Bakalstroy, 1932–1942)]. In Ural v 1941–1945: ekonomika i kul’tura voennogo vremeni. Materialy regional’nogo nauchnogo seminara, Chelyabinsk, 10 aprelya 2005 g. Chelyabinsk, Izdatel’stvo Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, pp. 38–51.

Gregori, P. (2006). Politicheskaya ekonomiya stalinizma [The Political Economy of Stalinism]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 400 p.

Kazus’, I. A. (2009). Sovetskaya arkhitektura 1920‑kh godov: organizatsiya proektirovaniya [Soviet Architecture of the 1920s: Organisation of Design]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya. 462 p.

Khlevnyuk, O. V. (1996). Politbyuro. Mekhanizmy politicheskoi vlasti v 1930‑e gody [Politburo. Mechanisms of Political Power in the 1930s]. Moscow, ROSSPEN. 294 p.

Konysheva, E. V., Meerovich, M. G. (2011). Ernst Mai i proektirovanie sotsgorodov v gody pervykh pyatiletok. (Na primere Magnitogorska) [Ernst May and the Design of Socialist Cities in the Years of the First Five-Year Plans. (with Reference to Magnitogorsk)]. Moscow, Nauchno-issledovatel’skii institut teorii i istorii arkhitektury i gradostroitel’stva Rossiiskoi akademii arkhitektury i stroitel’nykh nauk. 221 p.

Kurganov, V. P. (1973). Tak rozhdalsya Uralkhimmash [This is How Uralkhimmash Was Born]. Sverdlovsk, Sredne-Ural’skoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. 140 p.

Meerovich, M. G. (2009). Sotsgorod – bazovoe ponyatie sovetskoi gradostroitel’noi teorii pervykh pyatiletok [Sotsgorod – the Basic Concept of the Soviet Urban Planning Theory of the First Five-Year Plans]. In Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta. No. 4, pp. 51–56.

Na Urale organizovan “Vostochnyi Soyuzstroi” [“Eastern Soyuzstroy” Organized in the Urals]. (1932). In Ural’skii rabochii. January 7. No. 6 (4852), p. 4.

Nikitin, D. I. (2017). Uralo-Pechorsk: nerealizovannyi proekt sozdaniya novoi ugol’no-metallurgicheskoi bazy SSSR v 1950‑kh gg [Uralo-Pechorsk: An Unrealised Project to Create a New Coal and Metallurgical Base of the USSR in the 1950s]. In Yanvarskie istoricheskie chteniya, posvyashchennye pamyati Yu. P. Shagdurova. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Ulan-Ude, 19 yanvarya 2017 goda. Ulan-Ude, Buryatskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, pp. 40–43.

Noskov, I. G. (1989–1990). Istoriya razvitiya Ural’skogo zavoda khimicheskogo mashinostroeniya. Rukopis’ [History of the Development of the Ural Chemical Engineering Plant. Manuscript]. In Muzei istorii Uralkhimmashzavoda (Publichnoe aktsionernoe obshchestvo “Uralkhimmash”). 76 p.

Novyi gigant khimicheskogo mashinostroeniya [A New Giant of Chemical Engineering]. (1931). In Ural’skii rabochii. August 27. No. 236 (4737), p. 3.

O razukrupnenii ob”edinenii Vysshego soveta narodnogo khozyaistva Soyuza SSR. Postanovlenie SNK SSSR ot 16.07.1931 No. 574 [On the Disaggregation of Associations of the Supreme Council of the National Economy of the USSR. Decree of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR as of 16.07.1931 No. 574]. (1931). In Konsul’tant Plyus [website]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ESU&n=28679#CN4lb2TQBhPRbMIn (accessed: 10.04.2022).

Pareshneva, G. N. (2002). Otkrytoe aktsionernoe obshchestvo Uralkhimmash [Uralkhimmash, an Open Joint Stock Company]. Yekaterinburg, S. n. 130 p.

Plan razvitiya khozyaistva Sverdlovska na vtoroe pyatiletie (1933–1937 gg.) v 4 ch. [Sverdlovsk Economic Development Plan for the Second Five-Year Period (1933–1937)]. (1932). Sverdlovsk, S. n. Part 1. XIX, 237 p.

Prichal’naya machta dolzhna byt’ gotova k 1 yanvarya [The Mooring Mast Should Be Ready by January 1]. (1934). In Za khimicheskuyu apparaturu. December 9. No. 6, p. 1.

RGAE [Russian State Archive of Economics]. Stock 8210. List 1. Dos. 175a, 225; Stock 9205. List 1. Dos. 47.

Shagi Khimmasha. 1942–1992 [Steps of Khimmash. 1942–1992]. (1992). Yekaterinburg, S. n. 248 p.

Skvoz’ prizmu vremeni. Istoricheskii ocherk [Through the Prism of Time. A Historical Essay]. (2011). Yekaterinburg, Kreativnaya komanda “Kipyatok”. 256 p.

Sysov, A. I. (2019). Gornozavodskaya zona Chelyabinskoi oblasti: nerealizovannye proekty 1930‑kh godov [Mining Zone of Chelyabinsk Region. Unrealized Projects of the 1930s]. In Lymarev, A. N. (Ed.). Gorokhovskie chteniya. Materialy desyatoi regional’noi muzeinoi konferentsii, Chelyabinsk, 1 noyabrya 2019 g. Chelyabinsk, Gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii muzei Yuzhnogo Urala, pp. 87–92.

TsDOOSO [Centre for Documentation of Public Organisations of Sverdlovsk Region]. Stock 4. List 20. Dos. 4977; List 21. Dos. 3129; Stock 161. List 1. Dos. 25, 31, 124; Stock 3009. List 1. Dos. 1, 2.

Tsykunov, G. A. (2022). Sayanskii TPK: nerealizovannyi proekt [Sayan TPK: An Unrealised Project]. In Irkutskii istoriko-ekonomicheskii ezhegodnik. Sbornik statei. Irkutsk, Baikal’skii gosudarstvennyi universitet, pp. 220–228. DOI 10.17150/978–5–7253–3085–4.21.

Uchest’ i ispravit’ oshibku otchetnogo sobraniya izbiratelei [Take into Account and Correct the Mistake of the Voter Registration Meeting]. (1934). In Za khimicheskuyu apparaturu. December 3. No. 5, p. 1.

Uralkhimmash – udarnaya stroika [Uralkhimmash – Shock Construction]. (1934). In Ural’skii rabochii. January 10. No. 9 (5543), p. 3.

Uralkhimmashstroi [Uralkhimmashstroi]. (1934). In Opyt stroiki. No. 3, p. 22.

Ural’skii zavod khimicheskogo mashinostroeniya [Ural Plant of Chemical Engineering]. (1939). In Ural’skii rabochii. September 10. No. 208 (7216), p. 3.

Ural’skii zavod tyazhelogo khimicheskogo mashinostroeniya [Ural Plant of Heavy Chemical Engineering]. (1939). In Ural’skii rabochii. No. 156 (7164), p. 4.

Vinogradov, V. I., Magnitskii, A. V. (1957). Ural’skii zavod khimicheskogo mashinostroeniya [Ural Plant of Chemical Engineering]. Moscow, Sverdlovsk, Mashgiz. 97 p.

Zuev-Ordynets, M. (1935) K prichalu! [To the Pier!]. In Ural’skii sledopyt. No. 9, pp. 59–62.

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Dumchikov, A., & Pimenova, K. (2023). An Uncompleted Machine-Building Giant in the Urals: Mobilisation Policy and Construction Practice. Quaestio Rossica, 11(4), 1445–1463. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.4.857

Issue

Section

Disputatio