Language Game in Ergonymic Nominations: Provocativeness and Emotional and Communicative Reception

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.1.787

Keywords:

language game, game ergonymicon, emotional assessment, communication barriers

Abstract

The problem field of this article lies in the examination of the mechanisms of modelling and reading the codes of language game in the aspect of their emotional and evaluative impact (including negative) on an individual’s consciousness. The author refers to game nominations of different objects in Yekaterinburg. She proceeds from the theoretical provisions on the complex polycode (multimodal) nature of human emotions, which determines the need for a comprehensive (linguistic, psychological, and psycholinguistic) approach to the analysis of discursive practices of speech activity. The author focuses on the phenomenon of language game understood as a form of lingua-creative thinking based on associative mechanisms of destruction and switching of perception stereotypes, modelling, and using verbal signs. The decoding of the linguistic game unit involves the identification of its prototype and the awareness of a special linguistic technique for its transformation. From this point of view, decoding game ergonyms appears as a reflexive act in which emotional and evaluative projections of their perception manifest themselves. In the light of linguistic technique, the author distinguishes ergonymic linguistic createmes emphasising the emotional and evaluative charge of the motivators used, and game ergonyms modelled using the principles of associative provocation, associative identification, associative derivability, and associative overlay. The article considers ergonymic game units and linguistic createmes, respectively, in the light of pragmatic attitudes and emotional-evaluative vectors of influence on the consciousness of various urban population groups. Additionally, the author pays special attention to emotional-evaluative negative attitudes as planned or unplanned reactions of the nominee to the game ergonym or ergonymic linguistic createmes. Examples of the first type are provocative ergonyms that intentionally cause emotional shock (at primary perception); the second type of game ergonyms and ergonymic linguistic createmes does not imply a negative reaction of the addressee, but their perception encounters communicative barriers – linguistic, social, role-playing, psychological, ideological, aesthetic, etc. To check the positive or negative assessment of the respective nominations, the analysis uses data from psycholinguistic experiments conducted by the author by interviewing random respondents of different gender and age and social and professional status among urban residents. Finally, the author makes a conclusion regarding the zones of negative emotions in the game ergonymic continuum and outlines the prospects of an in-depth experimental study of the psychological reality of the perception of such nominations by bearers of urban culture.

Author Biography

Tatiana Gridina

Dr. Hab. (Philology), Head of Department of General Linguistics and the Russian Language, Ural State Pedagogical University.

26, Kosmonavtov Ave., 620091, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0003-3993-5164

tatyana_gridina@mail.ru

References

Damasio, A. R. (2018). The Strange Order of Things. Life, Feeling and the Making of Cultures. N. Y., Vintage Books. 310 p.

Goryaev, S. (2014). “Chernyi monakh”, “Sleza monashki”: tserkovnaya tematika v nazvaniyakh vin postsovetskogo vremeni [The Black Monk and The Nun’s Tear: Church-Related Wine Names in the Post-Soviet Times]. In Quaestio Rossica. No. 3, pp. 209–226. DOI 10.15826/qr.2014.3.070.

Gridina, T. A. (1996). Yazykovaya igra: stereotip i tvorchestvo [Language Game: Stereotype and Creative Work]. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet. 214 p.

Gridina, T. A., Konovalova, N. I. (2022). “Chitaem znaki”: aspekty vospriyatiya igrovogo polikodovogo teksta v prostranstve sovremennogo goroda [“Reading the Signs”: Aspects of the Perception of a Game Polycode Text in the Space of a Modern City]. In Nauchnyi dialog. Vol. 11. No. 8, pp. 166–184. DOI 10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-8-166-184.

Karaulov, Yu. N. (2022). Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’ [Russian Language and Linguistic Persona]. Moscow, URSS. 264 p.

Kostomarov, V. G. (1994). Yazykovoi vkus ehpokhi [Linguistic Taste of the Era]. Moscow, Pedagogika-press. 247 p.

Leont’ev, A. A. (2006). Slovo v rechevoi deyatel’nosti. Nekotorye problemy obshchei teorii rechevoi deyatel’nosti [Word in Speech Activity: Some Issues of the General Theory of Speech Activity]. Moscow, KomKniga. 248 p.

Markelova, T. V., Petrushina, M. V. (2022). Emotsional’noe prostranstvo v grammaticheskom uchenii P. A. Lekanta: smysly i formy [Emotional Space in the Grammatical Teaching of P. A. Lekant: Meanings and Forms]. In Lekantovskie chteniya – 2022. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Moscow, Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi oblastnoi universitet, pp. 28–33.

Mulvenna, C. M. (2013). Synesthesia and Creativity. In Simner, J., Hubbard, E. M. (Eds.). Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 607–630.

Myagkova, E. Yu. (2022). Yazyk – emotsii – soznanie – kul’tura v teorii A. Damasio [Language – Emotions – Consciousness – Culture in the Theory of A. Damasio]. In Voprosy psikholingvistiki. No. 4 (54), pp. 72–85.

Petrenko, V. F. (2010). Osnovy psikhosemantiki [Fundamentals of Psychosemantics]. Moscow, EKSMO. 480 p.

Remchukova, E. N. (2013). Massovyi lingvokreativ: preodolenie standarta [Mass Linguistic Creativity: Overcoming the Standard]. In Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. No. 2, pp. 83–89.

Ruzhitskii, I. V., Potemkina, E. V. (2022). Mnemy i memy kak stimul dlya razvitiya lingvokreativnoi kompetentsii inostrannykh uchashchikhsya [Mnemes and Memes as an Incentive for the Development of Linguistic and Creative Competence of Foreign Students]. In Ural’skii filologicheskii vestnik. Seriya: Yazyk. Sistema. Lichnost’. Lingvistika kreativa. No. 2, pp. 564–586.

Sagiv, N. (2005). Synesthesia in Perspective. In Synesthesia: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 3–10.

Shakhovskii, V. I. (2008). Lingvisticheskaya teoriya emotsii [Linguistic Theory of Emotions]. Moscow, Gnozis. 416 p.

Shmeleva, T. V. (2022). Stilistika gorodskogo onomastikona kak factor kreativnosti [Stylistics of the Urban Onomasticon as a Factor of Creativity]. In Gridina, T. A. (Ed.). Lingvistika kreativa – 5. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet, pp. 342–362.

Sternin, I. A. (2012). Osnovy rechevogo vozdeistviya [Basics of Speech Influence]. Voronezh, Istoki. 178 p.

Vepreva, I. T. (2019). Sovremennyi ergonimikon: v poiske novykh form vyrazheniya [Modern Ergonymicon: In Search of New Forms of Expression]. In Voprosy onomastiki. Vol. 16. No. 4, pp. 168–179. DOI 10.15826/vopr_onom.2019.16.4.051.

Yakobson, P. M. (1998). Psikhologiya chuvstv i motivatsii [Psychology of Feelings and Motivation] / ed. by E. M. Borisova. Moscow, Institut prakticheskoi psikhologii, NPO “ModehK”. 304 p.

YaSG-2022 – Yazyk sovremennogo goroda. Arkhiv kafedry obshchego yazykoznaniya i russkogo yazyka Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [The Language of the Modern City. Archive of the Department of General Linguistics and the Russian Language of Ural State Pedagogical University].

Zalevskaya, A. A. (2014). Chto tam – za slovom? Voprosy interfeisnoi teorii znacheniya slova [What’s behind a Word? Questions of the Interface Theory of Word Meaning]. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media. 328 p.

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Gridina, T. (2022). Language Game in Ergonymic Nominations: Provocativeness and Emotional and Communicative Reception. Quaestio Rossica, 11(1), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.1.787

Issue

Section

Problema voluminis