A Comparison between Russia-Qing Trade and Anglo-Chinese Trade in 1802–1860





economic contact zone, Russia, China, UK, nineteenth century, Kyakhta trade, Guangzhou trade, tea, opium, barter, currency


During the first half of the nineteenth century, tea became an essential commodity in the Kyakhta trade, accounting for over 90 % of total imports. Russia increased tea imports to address its growing demand for tea. The country handled the increasing tea imports by simultaneously increasing the exports of fur, wool, and cotton. British trade with China in Guangzhou was for smuggled opium in exchange for tea. When the Qing dynasty attempted to eradicate opium trade, the UK waged two wars and legalised the opium trade. The UK’s illegal opium trade and military provocations had a significant impact on China’s politics, economy, and society, as well as a decisive impact on the decline of the Kyakhta trade. Opium, which was banned, became a monopoly product for the British, and Russia’s export products — except for silver — could not compete with opium. The UK’s illegal sale of opium increased China’s opium consumption. Consequently, this reduced the purchasing power of the Chinese, worsening the sales conditions of Russian export products. In the end, the opium trade led to a shortage of silver and an increase in the value of silver coins in China. Chinese merchants preferred silver or silver coins to other products when trading with Russia. As a result, the Russian government approved the exchange of silver, effectively ending barter trade throughout Kyakhta.

Author Biography

Ji-bae Park

PhD, Professor, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.

107, Imun-ro, 02450, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

ORCID 0000-0003-3339-3851



Allen, R. C., Bassino, J.-P., Ma Debin, Moll-Murata, C., van Zanden, J. L. (2011). Wages, Prices, and Living Standards in China, 1738–1925: In Comparison with Europe, Japan, and India. In Economic History Rev. Vol. 64. No. S1, pp. 8–38.

British Parliament Papers (1859). Session 2. Vol. 23. Account and Papers. East India. Clark, G., Huberman, M., Lindert, P. H. (1995). A British Food Puzzle, 1770–1850. In Economic History Rev. Vol. 48. No. 2, pp. 215–237.

Eastman, L. E. (1988). Family, Fields, and Ancestors: Constancy and Change in China’s Social and Economic History, 1550–1949. N. Y., Oxford Univ. Press. 267 p.

Edinarkhova, N. E. (2015). Kyakhta i kyakhtinskaya torgvlya. (40-60-ye gg. XIX v.). [Kyakhta and the Kyakhta Trade. 1840s–1860s]. Irkutsk, Ottisk, 153 p.

Fletcher, J. (1978). Sino-Russian Relations, 1800–62. In Cambridge History of China. 15 vols. Cambridge, N. Y., Cambridge Univ. Press. Vol. 10. Late Ch’ing, 1800–1911. Part 1, pp. 318–350.

Gagemeister, Yu. A. (1854). Statisticheskoe obozrenie Sibiri v 3 ch. [Statistical Review of Siberia. 3 Parts]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya Vtorogo Otdeleniya Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantselyarii. Part 2. 697 p.

Greenberg, M. (1951). British Trade and the Opening of China 1800–42. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 238 p.

GVT – Gosudarstvennaya vneshnyaya torgovlya v raznykh ee vidakh za 1802–1807, 1812–1860 gg. [State Foreign Trade in Its Various Forms for 1802–1807, 1812–1860]. (1803–1808, 1813–1861). St Petersburg, Gosudarstvennaya Kommerts-kollegiya.

Hao, Yen-P’ing. (1986). The Commercial Revolution in Nineteenth-Century China: The Rise of Sine Western Capitalism. Berkeley, Univ. of California Press. 394 p.

Hsü, I. C. Y. (2000). The Rise of Modern China. 6th Ed. N. Y., Oxford Univ. Press. 1052 p.

Khamzin, I. R. (2021). Morskaya torgovlya Rossii i Kitaya vo vtoroi polovine XIX v. [Maritime Trade Between Russia and China in the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Yekaterinburg, S. n. 263 p.

Khokhlov, A. N. (1982). Kyakhtinskaya torgovlya i ee mesto v politike Rossii i Kitaya (20-e gody XVIII v. – 50-e gody XIX v.) [The Kyakhta Trade and Its Place in the Politics of Russia and China (1720s–1850s)]. In Dokumenty oprovergayut. Protiv fal’sifikatsii istorii russko-kitaiskikh otnoshenii. Moscow, Mysl’, pp. 99–147.

Korsak, A. (1857). Istoriko-statisticheskoe obozrenie torgovykh snoshenii Rossii s Kitaem [Historical and Statistical Review of Trade Relations between Russia and China]. Kazan, Izdaniy knigotorgovtsa Ivana Dubrovina. 445 p.

Kovalevskii, E. (1853). Puteshestvie v Kitai v 2 ch. [Travel to China. 2 Parts]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya Koroleva i Co. Part 2. 213 p.

Mironov, B. N. (1981). Vnutrennii rynok Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v. [The Domestic Market of Russia in the Second Half of the 18th – First Half of the 19th Centuries]. Leningrad, Nauka. 252 p.

Morse, H. B. (1910–1918). The International Relations of the Chinese Empire. 3 vols. L., Longmans, Green, and Co. Vol. 1. The Period of Conflict, 1834–1860. XXXVII, 727 p.

Morse, H. B. (1926). The Chronicles of the East India Company Trading to China 1635–1834. 4 vols. Oxford, Clarendon Press. Vol. 2. 320 p. Vol. 4. 427 p.

Nebolsin, G. P. (1850). Statisticheskoe obozrenie vneshnei torgovli Rossii v 2 ch. [Statistical Review of Russia’s Foreign Trade. 2 Parts]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya Departamenta vneshnei torgovli. 409 p.

Park, J. B. (2014). The Significance of British Tea Trade with China within the Modern World-System in the Eighteenth and First Half of Nineteenth Centuries. In Yoksa Harbo. Vol. 224, pp. 337–369.

Pelcovits, N. A. (1948). Old China Hands and the Foreign Office. N. Y., King’s Crown Press. 349 p.

Pokrovskii, V. I. (1909). Statisticheskie svedeniya o torgovle Rossii s Kitaem [Statistical Information on Russia’s Trade with China]. St Petersburg, Tipolitografiya M. P. Frolovoi. [2], 25, 42 p.

PSZ [Complete Collection of the Laws of the Russian Empire]. Collection 1. Vol. 26.

PSZ [Complete Collection of the Laws of the Russian Empire]. Collection 2. Vol. 13, 16, 19, 20, 29-1, 37.

RGIA [Russian State Historical Archive]. Stock 994. List 1. Dos. 313.

Sargent, A. J. (1907). Anglo-Chinese Commerce and Diplomacy (Mainly in the Nineteenth Century). Oxford, Clarendon Press. 332 p.

Semenov, A. V. (1859). Izucheniye istoricheskikh svedenii o rossiiskoi vneshnei torgovle i promyshlennosti s poloviny XVII-go stoletiya po 1858 g. v 3 ch. [The Study of Historical Information about Russian Foreign Trade and Industry from the Middle of the 17th Century to 1858]. St Petersburg, Tipografiya I. I. Glazunova. Part 3. 536 p.

Spence, J. D. (2001). The Search for Modern China. N. Y., L., W. W. Norton & Co. 876 p.

Tagarov, Zh. Z. (2015). Mongolʹskii tranzit i russko-kitaiskaya kyakhtinskaya torgovlya v kontse XVII – nachale XX veka [Mongolian Transit and Russian-Chinese Kyakhta Trade in the Late 17th – Early 20th Centuries]. In Rossiya i Mongoliya: novyi vzglyad na istoriyu: (diplomatiya, ekonomika, kulʹtura). Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Irkutsk, Ulan-Bator, Izdatel’stvo Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. Book 5, pp. 183–199.

Temnikov, E. G. (2021). Mezhgosudarstvennye otnosheniya Rossii i Kitaya vo vtoroi polovine XIX v. [International Relations between Russia and China in the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Kazan, S. n. 275 p.

Von Glahn, R. (2016). The Economic History of China. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 461 p.

Wakeman, F. (2008). The Canton Trade and the Opium War. In The Cambridge History of China. 15 vols. Cambridge, N. Y., Cambridge Univ. Press. Vol. 10. Late Ch’ing, 1800–1911. Part 1, pp. 163–212.

Zhuang Guotu. (1993). Tea, Silver, Opium and War: The International Tea Trade and Western Commercial Expansion into China in 1740–1840. Xiamen, Xiamen Univ. Press. 224 p.

Zhurnal manufaktur i torgovli [Zhurnal Manufaktur i Torgovli]. (1849). No. 2, pp. 131–244.



How to Cite

Park, J.- bae. (2022). A Comparison between Russia-Qing Trade and Anglo-Chinese Trade in 1802–1860. Quaestio Rossica, 10(4), 1288–1303. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.4.729



Problema voluminis