The Idea of Eastern Countries in Pacific Russia: The Paradoxes of Public Opinion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.4.726

Keywords:

public opinion, Pacific Russia, China, Japan, North Korea, South Korea

Abstract

This article examines the research results of the Public Opinion Research Laboratory of the Institute of History of the RAS obtained during field studies of 2010–2021. The authors analyse the key elements of the views of the Far Eastern Federal District residents on the countries of East Asia – China, Japan, North, and South Korea. Also, the authors focus on such basic elements of these notions as historical memory, people’s economic and humanitarian needs, and external threats to regional and national security. It is established that historical memory works selectively. Regarding China, it supports the uncertain feelings of Pacific Russians in the finality of resolving the border issue between the two countries, while Japanese territorial claims are primarily perceived through the prism of modern politics. However, neither one nor the other prevents the inhabitants’ interest in the history and culture of the neighboring states, focusing their economic interests on interaction, first of all, with these three countries. It is China, Japan, and South Korea that they consistently view as major economic partners of Pacific Russia. The authors estimate that the high level of development of these countries’ economies along with the uniqueness and attractiveness of authentic cultures, as well as positive assessments of the current state and prospects of bilateral relations en masse have become the forces of attraction that encourage the Far Easterners to have a fellow feeling for them. At the same time, the countries of the Korean peninsula receive much less attention in Pacific Russia, and their images are mostly neutral and vague. The authors also note that the stereotypes that were rooted in the minds of Russians more than a century ago (the refined culture of Japan and the poor, uncultured China) place these two countries on different levels in the rating of their sympathies: Japan was a stable and undisputed leader, while China, despite noticeable rising popularity in recent years, along with South Korea remained in the middle. Finally, they conclude that a large proportion of the residents of the region, although not trusting their Asian neighbours too much, are not only interested in an economic interaction with the surrounding Asian world but are also psychologically committed to it.

Author Biographies

Viktor Larin

Dr. Hab. (History), Head of the Centre for Global and Regional Studies, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the Peoples of the Far East of the Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

89, Pushkinskaya Str., 690001, Vladivostok, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-2825-8391

larin.vic@gmail.com

Liliia Larina

PhD (History), Leading Researcher, Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the Peoples of the Far East of the Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

89, Pushkinskaya Str., 690001, Vladivostok, Russia.

ORCID 0000-0002-5040-3671

lilylar25@mail.ru

References

Alexseev, M. A., Hofstetter, R. (2006). Russia, China, and the Immigration Security Dilemma. In Political Science Quarterly. No. 1, pp. 1–32.

Baranovskii, M. V. (2019). Sovremennye praktiki metodologicheskogo izucheniya fenomena doveriya [Modern Practices of Methodological Research of the Phenomenon of Trust]. In Vlast’. No. 2, pp. 183–190. DOI 10.31171/vlast.v27i2.6349.

Bryce, J. (1889). The American Commonwealth. 4 vols. N. Y., Macmillan and Co. Vol. 2. 760 p.

China’s Economic Growth Mostly Welcomed in Emerging Markets, but Neighbors Wary of Its Influence. (N. d.). In Pew Research Center [website]. URL: htpp://www.pewresearch.org (accessed: 20.07.2020).

Chugrov, S. (2007). Ponyatie vneshnepoliticheskogo mentaliteta i metodologiya ego izucheniya [The Concept of Foreign Policy Mentality and the Methodology of its Studying]. In Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. No. 4, pp. 46–65.

Chugrov, S. V. (2016). Obraz Rossii v Yaponii i obraz Yaponii v Rossii. Rabochaya tetrad’ 33/2016 [The Image of Russia in Japan and the Image of Japan in Russia. Workbook 33/2016]. Moscow, Nekommercheskoe partnerstvo “Rossiiskii sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam”. 64 p.

Dal’nevostochnoe tamozhennoe upravlenie. Tamozhennaya statistika [Far Eastern Customs Administration. Customs Statistics]. (N. d.). In Dal’nevostochnoe tamozhennoe upravlenie [official website]. URL: http://dvtu.customs.ru/ (accessed: 05.01.2022).

Dogovor o dobrososedstve, druzhbe i sotrudnichestve mezhdu Rossiiskoi Federatsiei i Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respublikoi [Treaty of Good Neighborliness, Friendship, and Cooperation Between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China]. (N. d.). In President Rossii [official website]. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/supplement/3418 (accessed: 14.01.2022).

Druzhestvennye i nedruzhestvennye strany [Friendly and Unfriendly Countries]. (N. d.). In Fond “Obshchestvennoe mnenie” [official website]. URL: https://fom.ru/Mir/14201 (accessed: 12.08.2020).

Galimova, N., Gordeev, V. (2020). Za vremya pandemii uroven’ doveriya k gosudarstvu upal u 61 % rossiyan [During the Pandemic, the Level of Trust in the State Fell Among 61 Percent of Russians]. In RBK [website]. May 26. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/26/05/2020/5eccff7b9a794728f8f0f327 (accessed: 14.01.2022).

Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press. 445 p.

Kalachinskii, A. V. (2015). “Povorot Rossii na Vostok”: pressa i formirovanie obshchestvennogo mneniya o vzaimootnosheniyakh Rossii i Kitaya [“Russia’s Turn to the East”: The Press and the Formation of Public Opinion on the Relationship between Russia and China]. In Rossiya i ATR. No. 3, pp. 127–140.

Kiselev, I. Yu., Smirnova, A. G. (2004). Obraz gosudarstva kak faktor prinyatiya vneshnepoliticheskikh reshenii [The Image of the State as a Factor in Making Foreign Policy Decisions]. In Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. No. 4, pp. 116–125.

Kleiner, T.-M. (2016). Why We Trust Other Nations: The Role of Cultural Values and Corruption in Generating Transnational Trust. In Comparative Sociology. No. 15 (1), pp. 85–111. DOI 10.1163/15691330-12341375.

Kulanov, A. E. (2004). Obraz Yaponii v segodnyashnei Rossii: stereotipy i realii [The Image of Japan in Today’s Russia: Stereotypes and Realities]. In Rossiya i Yaponiya: sosedi v novom tysyacheletii. Moscow, AIRO – XX, pp. 55–73.

Larin, A. G. (2009). Kitaiskie migranty v Rossii. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [The Chinese Migrants in Russia. History and Modernity]. Moscow, Vostochnaya kniga. 512 p.

Larin, V. L., Larina, L. L. (2020). Menyayushchiesya obrazy Vostochnoi Azii v soznanii zhitelei Tikhookeanskoi Rossii: srezy poslednikh let [Changing Images of East Asia in the Minds of the Inhabitants of Pacific Russia: Features of Recent Years]. In Rossiya i ATR, No. 4, pp. 15–45. DOI 10.24411/1026-8804-2020-10045.

Larina, L. L., Tomashuk, S. M. (2020). Velikaya Otechestvennaya voina v pamyati zhitelei Primorskogo kraya (po rezul’tatam sotsiologicheskogo oprosa 2020 g.) [The Great Patriotic War in the Memory of the Residents of Primorye Region (Based on the Results of the Sociological Survey in 2020)]. In Rossiya i ATR. No. 4, pp. 145–160. DOI 10.24411/1026-8804-2020-10056.

Materialy oprosov naseleniya Dal’nevostochnogo federal’nogo okruga [Materials of Surveys of the Population of Far Eastern Federal District]. (N. d.). In Tekushchii arkhiv Laboratorii izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya Instituta istorii, arkheologii i etnografii narodov Dal’nego Vostoka Dal’nevostochnogo otdeleniya RAN. O Rossii i stranakh mira [About Russia and the Countries of the World]. (N. d.). In Fond “Obshchestvennoe mnenie” [official website]. URL: http://fom.ru/Mir/13624 (accessed: 14.02.2022).

Ponkratova, L. A., Zabiyako, A. P., Kobyzov, R. A. (2009). Russkie i kitaitsy: etnomigratsionnye protsessy na Dal’nem Vostoke [Russians and the Chinese: Ethno-Migration Processes in the Far East]. Blagoveshchensk, Amurskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. 412 p.

Potok inostrannykh turistov vyros v Primor’e [The Flow of Foreign Tourists Has Grown in Primorye]. (2020). In Vostok Rossii. Informationno-analiticheskoe agentstvo [website]. Jan. 17. URL: https://www.eastrussia.ru/news/potok-inostrannykh-turistovvyros-v-primore/ (accessed: 18.01.2020).

Razvitie turistskikh svyazei Khabarovskogo kraya s zarubezhnymi stranami v 2016 godu [Development of Tourist Relations of Khabarovsk Krai with Foreign Countries in 2016]. (N. d.). In Turisticheskii portal Khabarovskogo kraya. URL: http://www.travel.khv.ru/pages/171 (accessed: 10.01.2022).

Strategicheskie interesy i politika Rossii i Avstralii v Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom regione (po materialam kruglogo stola) [Russia’s and Australia’s Strategic Interests and Policies in the Asia-Pacific Region (Based on Workshop Materials)]. (2012). In U karty Tikhogo okeana. No. 24. 36 p.

Svedeniya o kolichestve zhitelei Primorskogo kraya, vyekhavshikh za granitsu za 2016 god, v sravnenii s 2015 godom [Information on the Number of Residents of Primorsky Krai Who Went abroad in 2016 as Compared to 2015]. (N. d.). In Pravitel’stvo Primorskogo kraya [official website]. URL: http://www.primorsky.ru/authorities/executive-agencies/departments/tourism-pk/plany-i-otchety-departamenta.php (accessed: 02.09.2019).

Published

2022-11-04

How to Cite

Larin, V., & Larina, L. (2022). The Idea of Eastern Countries in Pacific Russia: The Paradoxes of Public Opinion. Quaestio Rossica, 10(4), 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.4.726

Issue

Section

Problema voluminis