Activities of Non-Governmental Organisations Aimed at Conflict Settlement in Post-Soviet States
Abstract
This article analyses the peace-making activities of Soviet/Russian nongovernmental public organisations (NGOs) with reference to the Federation for Peace and Conciliation, the successor of the Soviet Peace Committee. NGOs were formed at the initiative of the state and party organs of the Soviet system but were transformed into independent NGOs after the collapse of the USSR with their own active strategy of assistance in conflict resolution. This study is based upon unique archive materials and the personal experience of one of the authors, who used to work for such organisations. The study focuses on the ethnopolitical conflicts which took place between the collapse of the USSR and the mid‑1990s. There is a widespread opinion in academic literature that so-called non-governmental organisations set up by the government do not have their own identity, especially during social crises, and passively follow the government’s political line. However, the study of their activities demonstrates that during the first years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, these organisations initiated a significant number of practical and political projects with the participation of high-ranked representatives of the governments, parliaments, and political parties of both post-Soviet and foreign states and international organisations, including the UN, OSCE, NATO, CIS, etc. This, in turn, played a role as a substantial supplement to classical interstate diplomacy and practically promoted the settlement of certain ethnopolitical conflicts. The archive materials analysed prove that in the early post-Soviet period, a certain inversion in the direction of political and ideological impulses took place, and a number of non-governmental organisations that used to transmit the interests of the Communist Party and state organs to the international environment were able to create new international projects and consultations in the form of “track one-and-a-half” diplomacy, i. e. the informal interaction of officials in the capacity of unofficial experts. And in such cases, it was NGOs which shaped the agenda and transmitted public interests to the state structures of Russia and the CIS states, mediating between fighting sides and amongst representatives of various states, practically assisting the settlement of ethnopolitical conflicts.
References
Gordeeva, I. A. (2013). Vozniknovenie nezavisimogo mirnogo dvizheniya v SSSR v 1980-e gody [The Emergence of an Independent Peace Movement in the USSR in the 1980s]. In Vestnik RGGU. Seriya Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie. No. 1, pp. 214–224.
Iji, T. (2019). Multiparty Mediation in Violent Conflict: Peacemaking Diplomacy in the Tajikistan Civil War. Oxford, Routledge. 206 p.
Kopecek, V., Hoch, T., Baar, V. (2016). Conflict Transformation and Civil Society: The Case of Nagorno-Karabakh. In Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 68. No. 3, pp. 441–459. DOI 10.1080/09668136.2016.1147528.
Lokshin, G. M. (2009). Kto za chto, a my za mir [Whatever They are for, We are for Peace]. In Obozrevatel’ – Observer. Nauchno-analiticheskii zhurnal. No. 6, pp. 63–75.
Lushnikov, D. A. (2019). Organizovannye pravitel’stvom nepravitel’stvennye organizatsii (GONGO): genezis problematiki, interpretatsiya i funktsii [Government-Organised Non-Governmental Organisations (GONGO): Genesis of the Problem, Interpretation, and Functions]. In Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. No 2, pp. 137–148. DOI 10/17976/jpps/2019.02.10.
Maslikhin, A. V. (2012). Idei mira i patsifizma na postsovetskom prostranstve [Ideas of Peace and Pacifism in the Post-Soviet Space]. In Vіsnik Lugans’kogo Natsіonal’nogo unіversitetu imenі Tarasa Shevchenka. Sotsіologіchnі nauki. No. 23, pp. 100–107.
Mel’vil’, A. Yu., Nikitin, A. I. (1991). Rostki novoi grazhdanskoi kul’tury? [Sprouts of New Civic Culture?]. In Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. No. 2, pp. 50–55.
Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v podderzhanii mira v konfliktnyh regionah na territorii SNG. 20–24.06.1994. Programma meropriyatiya [International Cooperation in Peacekeeping in Regional Conflicts in the CIS Area. 20–24.06.1994. Event Programme]. (1994). In Arkhiv direktsii TsPMI. Ofitsial’nye dokumenty.
Mikhailov, S. G. (2009). Mir v sobstvennom dome i vo vsem mire. K 60-letiyu Sovetskogo komiteta zashchity mira – Federatsii mira i soglasiya [Peace in Your Own Home and in All the World. For the 60th Anniversary of the Soviet Peace Committee – Federation for Peace and Conciliation]. Moscow, Federatsiya mira i soglasiya. 541 p.
Nikitin, A. I. (Ed.). (1992). Kollektivnaya bezopasnost’ dlya Rossii I SNG [Collective Security for Russia and the CIS]. Moscow, Tsentr politicheskikh i mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii. 162 p.
Orlova, G. (2007). “Traktor v pole ‘dyr-dyr-dyr’, vse my boremsya za mir”: sovetskoe mirolyubie v brezhnevskuyu epokhu [“A tractor in a field makes а noise, we all fight for peace”: Soviet Pacifism in the Brezhnev Era]. In Neprikosnovennyi zapas. No. 4, pp. 70–88.
Politicheskaya stabil’nost’ v SSSR i mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost’. 16.05.1991. Protokol meropriyatiya [Political Stability in the USSR and International Security. 16.05.1991. Proceedings]. (1991). In Arkhiv SKZM/FMS. Ofitsial’nye dokumenty.
Popescu, N. (2011). The EU and Civil Society in the Georgian–Abkhaz Conflict. In Tocci, N. (Ed.). The European Union, Civil Society and Conflict. Oxford, Routledge, pp. 46–67.
Problemy obespecheniya stabil’nosti i primireniya na Severnom Kavkaze i v Zakavkaz’e, aprel’ 1994. Otchet [Issues of Securing Stability and Conciliation in the Northern Caucasus and Transcaucasia, April 1994. Report]. (1994). In Arkhiv SKZM/FMS. Ofitsial’nye dokumenty.
Raeva, T. V. (2016). Osobennosti institutsional’noi organizatsii Sovetskogo mirolyubiya v epokhu kholodnoi voiny [Specificities of the Institutional Organisation of Soviet Peace-Making Activities in the Era of the Cold War]. In Upravlenie v Sovremennykh Sistemakh. Vol. 4, No. 11.
Raeva, T. V. (2017). Sovetskoe dvizhenie za mir v poslevoennoi kul’turnoi diplomatii: instituty, diskursy, praktiki [Soviet Peace Movement in Post-War Cultural Diplomacy: Institutes, Discourses, Practices]. In Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye nauki. Vol. 17. No. 2, pp. 19–25. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.154288.
Saunders, H. H. (1999). The Inter-Tajik Dialogue. In A Public Peace Process. N. Y., Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 147–170.
Saunders, H. H. (2019). Ustoichivyi dialog v konfliktakh: transformatsii i izmeneniya [Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts: Transformation and Change] / transl. by I. Polyanicheva. Moscow, Aspekt-Press. 380 p.
Stepanova, E. A. (2019). Dinamika dialoga v konfliktakh: vtoroi trek [Dynamics of a Dialogue in Conflicts: Second Track]. In Puti k miru i bezopasnosti. No. 1, pp. 135–146. DOI 10.20542/2307-1494-2019-1-135-146.
Stewart, S. (2004). The Role of International and Local NGOs in the Transformation of the Georgian-Abkhazian Conflict. In The Global Rev. of Ethnopolitics. Vol. 3. No. 3–4, pp. 3–22. DOI 10.1080/14718800408405170.
The Dartmouth Conference: The First Fifty Years (1960–2010). (2010). N. Y. : Kettering Foundation. 82 р.
Venturi, B. (2011). Civil Society Organizations and Conflict Resolution: Moldova – Transnistria. In Intern. J. on World Peace. Vol. 28. No. 2, pp. 7–34.
Viktorov, A. G. (2016). Vliyanie Sovetskogo komiteta zashchity mira (SKZM) na razvitie obshchestvenno-politicheskoi situatsii v 1965–1985 gg. [The Influence of the Soviet Peace Committee (SCZM) on the Development of the Socio-Political Situation in 1965–1985]. In Byulleten’ nauki i praktiki. No. 9, pp. 168–170. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.154288.
Vstrecha-dialog po gruzino-abkhazskomu konfliktu, sentyabr’ 1992. Programma meropriyatiya [Dialogue Meeting on the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict, September 1992. Event Programme]. (1992). In Arkhiv direktsii TsPMI. Ofitsial’nye dokumenty.
