Edinoverie and the Concept of Confessionalisation: Discursive Remarks


  • James White




This article considers whether ‘confessionalization’ can be used to understand and conceptualise the period of edinoverie reforms between 1905 and 1918. Edinoverie was a missionary movement founded in 1800 by Metropolitan Platon (Levshin) that allowed converts from Old Belief to maintain their old rituals in exchange for their loyalty to the Church. The concept of confessionalization was developed by Wolfgang Reinhard and Heinz Schilling in the 1980s to explain religious and social developments in the history of the German Reformation and how these structural processes laid the foundations for the evolution of the absolutist state. The concept puts forward the hypothesis that the religious competition in the aftermath of Luther and Calvin led to the development of strongly delineated confessions and confessional identities, which were propounded and enforced by ever-more comprehensive church administrative organs. The increased level of authority that these administrative bodies gave to church elites allowed for heightened surveillance of behavior and the disciplining of deviancy. The German princes were inherently interested in this process: this frequently led to integration between churches and states, which in turn developed the administrative reach of governments. While the concept is not unproblematic, it has become a cornerstone of historiographical research about the Reformation in both Germany and other European countries: some historians have also applied it to Russia. This article considers the parallels with between confessionalization in Reformation Germany and the programme of edinoverie reforms launched by Father Simeon Shleev after 1905. It argues that, while edinoverie’s peculiarities make it necessary to be cautious when applying confessionalization to this case, conceptualizing edinoverie’s history in the early twentieth century as confessionalization offers numerous benefits to historians.


Benedict, P. (2001). Confessionalization in France? Critical Reflections and New Evidence. In The Faith and Fortunes of France’s Huguenots : 1600—1685 (pp. 309–326). Aldershot, Ashgate Publ.
Blaschke, O. (2002). Der “Dämon des Konfessionalismus” Einführende Überlegungen. In Blaschke, O. (Ed.). Konfessionen im Konflikt. Deutschland zwischen 1800 und 1970: Ein zweites konfessionelles Zeitalter (pp. 13–69). Gottingen, Vanderhoech & Ruprecht.
Brady, Jr. T. A. (2004). “Confessionalization”: The Career of a Concept. In Headley, J. M., Hillerbrand, H. J. & Papalas, A. K. (Eds.). Confessionalization in Europe, 1555–1700 : Essays in Honour and Memory of Bodo Nischan (pp. 1–20). Aldershot, Ashgate.
Brüning, A. (2008). Confessionalization in the Slavia Orthodoxa (Belorussia, Ukraine, Russia)? – Potential and Limits of a Western Historiographical Concept. In Bremer, T. (Ed.). Religion and the Conceptual Boundary in Central and Eastern Europe. Encounters of Faiths (pp. 66–120). Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Dribintsev, G. (1908). Tserkovnaya shkola v edinovercheskom prikhode [Church School in an Old Believer Parish]. In Pravda pravoslaviya, 22–23, pp. 1–4.
Driedger, M. D. (2002). Obedient Heretics : Mennonite Identities in Lutheran Hamburg and Altona during the Confessional Age. 224 p. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Edinoverets : Eparkhial′noe nachal′stvo v roli iskateli edinoveriya [The Diocesan Administration in the Role of Searchers for Edinoverie]. (1907). In Pravda pravoslaviya, 2, pp. 12–14.
Egorov, I. (1906). K voprosu o vserossyskom bratstve staropravoslavnykh [With Regards to the Question about an All-Russian Fraternity of the Old Orthodox]. In Glagol vremen, 13, pp. 11–13.
Francois, E. (2002). Die unsichtbare Grenze : Protestanten und Katholiken in Augsburg 1648–1806. 304 p. Gottingen.
Freeze, G. L. (2006). Russian Orthodoxy: Church, People, and Politics in Imperial Russia. In Lieven, D. (Ed.). Cambridge History of Russia. Vol. 2, pp. 284–305. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press.
Halvorson, M. J. (2001). Theology, Ritual, and Confessionalization : The Making and Meaning of Lutheran Baptism in Reformation Germany, 1520–1816 : PhD. Dissertation. Washington, Univ. of Washington.
Harrington, J. F. & Smith, H. W. (1997). Confessionalization, Community, and State Building in Germany, 1555–1870. In The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 69, № 1, pp. 77–101.
Headley, J. M. (2004). Introduction. In Headley, J. M., Hillerbrand, H. J. & Papalas, A. K. (Eds.). Confessionalization in Europe, 1555–1700 : Essays in Honour and Memory of Bodo Nischan (pp. 17–25). Aldershot, Ashgate.
Hsia, R. Po-Chia (1989). Social Discipline in the Reformation: Central Europe 1550–1750. London, New York, Routledge. Kaplan, B. J. (1997). Confessionalism and Its Limits: Religion in Utrecht, 1600–1650. In Spicer, J. A. & Orr, L. F. (Eds.). Masters of Light: Dutch Painters in Utrecht during the Golden Age (pp. 60–71). Baltimore, San Francisco, L., N. Haven.
Keul, I. (2009). Early Modern Religious Communities in East-Central Europe. Ethnic Diversity, Denominational Plurality, and Corporative Politics in the Principality of Transylvania (1526–1691). xvii, 313 p. Leiden, Brill.
Lavrov, A. S. (2000). Koldovstvo i religii v Rossii, 1700–1740 gg. [Sorcery and Religion in Russia, 1700–1740]. 576 p. Moscow, Drevlekhranilishche. Lotz-Huemann, U. (2000). Die doppelte Konfessionlisierung in Irland : Konflikt und
Koexistenz im 16 und in der ersten Hälfte des 17. Jahrhunderts. Tubingen, Mohr Siebeck. Lotz-Heumann, U. (2001). The Concept of “Confessionalization”: A Historiographical Paradigm in Dispute. In Memoria y Civilizacion, 4, pp. 93–114.
Marshall, P. (2012). Confessionalization and Community in the Burial of English Catholics, c. 1570—1700. In Lewycky, N. & Morton, A. (Eds.). Getting Along? Religious Identities and Confessional Relations in Early Modern England (pp. 57–77). Farnham, Ashgate.
Nischan, B. (1996). Ritual and Protestant Identity in Late Reformation Germany. In Gordon, B. (Ed.). Protestant History and Identity in Sixteenth-Century Europe. Vol. 2, pp. 142–159. Aldershot, Scholar Press.
Palkin, A. S. (2014). Edinoverie v kontse 1820-kh – 1850-e gody: mekhanizmy gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya [Edinoverie from the end of the 1820s to the 1850s: Mechanisms of State Persecution]. In Quaestio Rossica, 3, pp. 88–106.
Pervyy vserossyskiy s′′ezd pravoslavnykh staroobryadtsev (edinovertsev) [The First All-Russian Congress of Orthodox Old Believers (Edinovertsy)]. (1912). Saint Petersburg. Pis′ma v redaktsiyu [Letters to the Editor]. (1906). In Pravda pravoslaviya, 10, pp. 15–16.
Plokhy, S. (2001). The Cossacks and Religion in Early Modern Ukraine. 401 p. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Reinhard, W. (1989). Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and the Early Modern State: A Reassessment. In The Catholic Historical Review, Vol. 75, № 3, pp. 383–404.
Schilling, H. (1992). Religion, Political Culture and the Emergence of Early Modern Society : Essays in German and Dutch History. Leiden, Brill.
Shleev, S. (1901). Edinoverie i ego stoletnee organizovannoe sushchestvovanie v Russkoy tserkvi [Edinoverie and its Century in the Russian Church]. 71 p. Saint Petersburg, Tipo-lit. V. V. Komarova.
Shleev, S. Edinoverie v svoem vnutrennem razvitii (v raz′′yasnenie ego malorasprostranennosti sredi staroobryadtsev) [Edinoverie in its Internal Development (in Explanation of its Limited Spread among the Old Believers)]. (1910). 364 + 2 p. Saint Petersburg, Sinodal′naya tip.
Skinner, B. (2009). The Eastern Church Between Poland and Russia: Identity and Conflict in the Era of Partition. DeKalb, Northern Illinois Univ. Press.
Spurlock, R. S. (2012). Confessionalization and Clan Cohesion: Ireland’s Contribution to Scottish Catholic Renewal in the Seventeenth Century. In Recusant History, Vol. 31, № 2, pp. 171–94.
Vnimaniyu edinovertsev [To the Attention of the Edinovertsy]. (1907). In Pravda pravoslaviya, 2, pp. 1–2.
Vtoroy vserossysky s′′ezd pravoslavnykh staroobryadtsev (edinovertsev) v N. Novgorode, 23–28 iyulya 1917 goda [The Second All-Russian Congress of Orthodox Old Believers (Edinovertsy) in Nizhnii Novgorod, 23–28 July 1917]. (1917). Petrograd, Tipografiya O-va raspr. rel.-nrav. prosveshch.
Vyatskiy edinovercheskiy s′′ezd (10–17 iyunya 1908 g.) i ego postanovleniya [The Viatka Edinoverie Congress (10–17 June 1908) and its Provisions]. (1908). In Vyatskie eparkhial′nye vedomosti, 41, pp. 1070–1084; 42, pp. 1089–1097; 43, pp. 1117–1125; 44, pp. 1155–1162; 45, pp. 1182–1191.
White, J. M. (2014). A Bridge to the Schism : Edinoverie, Russian Orthodoxy and the Ritual Formation of Confessions, 1800–1918 : PhD. dissertation. Europ. Univ. Institute.
White J. M. (2015). Edinoverie i ofitsial′noe pravoslavie: neudavshiysya opyt ob′′edineniya v praktike publichnykh tseremoniy (1900–1913) [Edinoverie and Official Orthodoxy: The Failure of Unity in Ceremonial Practice]. In Quaestio Rossica, 2, pp. 201–223.



How to Cite

White, J. (2016). Edinoverie and the Concept of Confessionalisation: Discursive Remarks. Quaestio Rossica, 4(4), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2016.4.199



Vox redactoris