Moscow in 1666: New Jerusalem, Third Rome, Third Apostasy


  • Maureen Perrie University of Birmingham



In this essay the author examines the disappearance from official Russian discourse of the idea of Muscovy as the New Israel. She suggests that it may partly be explained in relation to his opponents’ accusations of blasphemy against Patriarch Nikon for naming his monastery on the River Istra as New Jerusalem. These accusations were made in the context of apocalyptic rumours about Nikon as the Antichrist, and about the imminent appearance of the Antichrist in Jerusalem in 1666. The decisions of the Church council of 1666–1667 – including its repudiation of the idea of the Third Rome – seemed to many Old Believers to confirm prophecies about 1666 as the date of a third and final apostasy from the true faith, after the Great Schism of 1054 and the Union of Brest of 1596. The ideas of the Third Rome and New Israel persisted among some Old Believers; but unlike the idea of the Third Rome, which was re-interpreted in the 19th and 20th centuries as evidence of Russian messianism and imperialism, the idea of the New Israel has been comparatively neglected.

Author Biography

Maureen Perrie, University of Birmingham



Berdyaev, N. (1961). The Russian Revolution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Chumicheva, O. V. (2009). Soloveczkoe vosstanie 1667–1676 gg. [Solovetsky rebellion in 1667–1676 yrs.]. (2nd ed.). Moscow: OGI.

Druzhinin, V. G. (1889). Raskol na Donu v konce XVII veka [Split on the Don in the late 17th century]. St. Petersburg.

Flier, M. S. (1997). Court ceremony in an age of reform. Patriarch Nikon and the Palm Sunday ritual. In S. H. Baron & N. Sh. Kollmann (Eds.), Religion and culture in early modern Russia and Ukraine (pp. 73–95). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

Flier, M. S. (2006). Political ideas and rituals. In M. Perrie (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Russia. Vol.1: From early Rus′ to 1689 (pp. 387–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Franklin, S. (2010). Printing Moscow: Significances of the frontispiece to the 1663 Bible. The Slavonic and East European Review, 88, 1–2 (Jan.–April), 73–95.

Gruber, I. (2012). Orthodox Russia in crisis: Church and nation in the Time of Troubles. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

Hosking, G. (1997). Russia: People and Empire, 1552–1917. London.

Hosking, G. (1997). The Russian national myth repudiated. In G. Hosking &

G. Schöpflin (Eds.), Myths and nationhood (pp. 198–210). London: Hurst & Company.

Hosking, G. (2001). Russia and the Russians: A history. London.

Hosking, G. (2006). Rulers and victims. The Russians in the Soviet Union. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.

Lukin, P. V. (2000). Narodny′e predstavleniya o czarskoj vlasti v Rossii XVII veka [People’s ideas on the throne in Russia in 17th century]. Moscow: Nauka.

Oparina, T. A. (2003). Chislo 1666 v russkoj knizhnosti serediny′ – tret′ej chetverti XVII v. [Number 1666 in Russian book-learning in the middle‑third quarter of 17th c.]. In M. S. Kiseleva (Ed.), Chelovek mezhdu Czarstvom i Imperiej: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoj konferencii (pp. 287–318). Moscow: Institut cheloveka RAN.

Ostrowski, D. (1998). Muscovy and the Mongols: cross-cultural influences on the steppe frontier, 1304–1589. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, W. (Transl.). (1871). The Replies of the humble Nicon, by the mercy of God Patriarch, against the Questions of the boyar Simeon Streshneff and the Answers of the Metropolitan of Gaza Paisius Ligarides. London: Trübner.

Palmer, W. (Transl.). (1873). History of the Condemnation of the Patriarch Nicon by a Plenary Council of the Orthodox Catholic Eastern Church, held at Moscow A. D. 1666–1667, written by Paisius Ligarides of Scio Ligarides. London: Trübner.

Pamyatniki literatury′ Drevnej Rusi: XVII vek. Kniga pervaya [Litarary works of the Old Russia: 17th century. Book one]. (1988). Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya literatura.

Poe, M. (2001). Moscow, the Third Rome: the origins and transformations of a “pivotal moment”. Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 49, 3, 412–429.

Rowland, D. B. (1996). Moscow – the Third Rome or the New Israel? In The Russian Review. (Vol. 55, pp. 591–614).

Russkaya istoricheskaya biblioteka. T. 39: Pamyatniki istorii staroobryadchestva XVII v. [Russian historical library. Vol. 39: Monuments of the Old Belief history of 17th c.]. (1927). Leningrad: Izdatelstvo AN SSSR.

Tumins, V. A. & Vernadsky, G. (Eds.). (1982). Patriarch Nikon on Church and State: Nikon’s “Refutation”. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton.

Uspenskij, B. A. (1998). Czar′ i patriarch: harizma vlasti v Rossii (Vizantijskaya model′ i ee russkoe pereosmy′slenie) [Tsar and patriarch: charisma of power in Russia (Byzantine model and its Russian rethinking)]. Moscow: Yazy′ki russkoj kul′tury′.

Yurganov, A. L. (1997). Oprichnina i strashny′j sud [Oprichnina and the Day of Judgement]. Otechestvennaya istoriya, 3, 52–75.

Zenkovsky, S. A. (1957). The ideological world of the Denisov brothers. In Harvard Slavic Studies. (Vol. 3, pp. 49–66).

Zenkovsky, S. A. (1970). Russkoe staroobryadchestvo. Duhovny′e dvizheniya semnadczatogo veka [Old-Belief in Russia. Spiritual movements of the seventeenth century]. Мunich.

Zhivov, V. M. & Uspenskij, B. A. (1994). Czar′ i Bog: Semioticheskie aspekty′ sakralizacii monarha v Rossii [Tsar and God: semiotic aspects of the sacralisation of the monarch in Russia]. In B. A. Uspenskij Izbran



How to Cite

Perrie, M. (2023). Moscow in 1666: New Jerusalem, Third Rome, Third Apostasy. Quaestio Rossica, (3), 75–85.



Vox redactoris